Zabier wrote:Hasn't he loaned it to us though so he is technically making a profit through interest? Or is that rubbish?
Igovernor wrote:It's his own money, not loaned and not from any of his companies
Igovernor wrote:It's his own money, not loaned and not from any of his companies
Zabier wrote:Hasn't he loaned it to us though so he is technically making a profit through interest? Or is that rubbish?
blueheaven wrote:I heard that all the money VT has put in has put him into the RED
TopCat CCFC wrote:Zabier wrote:Hasn't he loaned it to us though so he is technically making a profit through interest? Or is that rubbish?
I was told that he is charging interest in the money he has put into the club.
since62 wrote:Igovernor wrote:It's his own money, not loaned and not from any of his companies
That`s not true though is it?
At least part of the loans put in to CCFC Holdings has been through two offshore companies , Edgedale International and Erskine Finance. It says so in the company accounts and at Companies House.
I don`t know who owns the shares in the Singapore registered Edgedale whose registered office is an accomodation address in the business district of Singapore. Erskine is a bit more of a mystery as a UK company with an identical name was dissolved about 10 years ago and the charge document given by CCFC to that company wasn`t properly registered so where Erskine has its registered address has not been disclosed.
The above two companies are as mysterious as Langstone , so it is not correct to say all the money invested to date is VT`s personal funds.
The Griff wrote:since62 wrote:Igovernor wrote:It's his own money, not loaned and not from any of his companies
That`s not true though is it?
At least part of the loans put in to CCFC Holdings has been through two offshore companies , Edgedale International and Erskine Finance. It says so in the company accounts and at Companies House.
I don`t know who owns the shares in the Singapore registered Edgedale whose registered office is an accomodation address in the business district of Singapore. Erskine is a bit more of a mystery as a UK company with an identical name was dissolved about 10 years ago and the charge document given by CCFC to that company wasn`t properly registered so where Erskine has its registered address has not been disclosed.
The above two companies are as mysterious as Langstone , so it is not correct to say all the money invested to date is VT`s personal funds.
Since 62
were does peter lim live , the reds fan who tried buying liverpool ,, whats the current ceo chairman surname mate
brickyblue wrote:TopCat CCFC wrote:Zabier wrote:Hasn't he loaned it to us though so he is technically making a profit through interest? Or is that rubbish?
I was told that he is charging interest in the money he has put into the club.
That seems a bit vague when you say put money in the way I see it to incur interest in something that is Lent is fine but if you give money or invest then no interest is charged.
So my thinking is he has loaned us the money at 7% interest which is why the club is in 80 mil debt I think it is.
if I understand it right then its part of the reason why I dont agree with VT .iF He had turned debt into equity and stabilize the club financially which he still may do but hasnt yet then I still wouldnt accept his rebrand but I would understand why others chose to embrace it all and him.If I am right IF then why do people embrace him so willingly.
prob butttimdog80 wrote:The Griff wrote:since62 wrote:Igovernor wrote:It's his own money, not loaned and not from any of his companies
That`s not true though is it?
At least part of the loans put in to CCFC Holdings has been through two offshore companies , Edgedale International and Erskine Finance. It says so in the company accounts and at Companies House.
I don`t know who owns the shares in the Singapore registered Edgedale whose registered office is an accomodation address in the business district of Singapore. Erskine is a bit more of a mystery as a UK company with an identical name was dissolved about 10 years ago and the charge document given by CCFC to that company wasn`t properly registered so where Erskine has its registered address has not been disclosed.
The above two companies are as mysterious as Langstone , so it is not correct to say all the money invested to date is VT`s personal funds.
Since 62
were does peter lim live , the reds fan who tried buying liverpool ,, whats the current ceo chairman surname mate
Aint it Simon Lim- His son??
TopCat CCFC wrote:brickyblue wrote:TopCat CCFC wrote:Zabier wrote:Hasn't he loaned it to us though so he is technically making a profit through interest? Or is that rubbish?
I was told that he is charging interest in the money he has put into the club.
That seems a bit vague when you say put money in the way I see it to incur interest in something that is Lent is fine but if you give money or invest then no interest is charged.
So my thinking is he has loaned us the money at 7% interest which is why the club is in 80 mil debt I think it is.
if I understand it right then its part of the reason why I dont agree with VT .iF He had turned debt into equity and stabilize the club financially which he still may do but hasnt yet then I still wouldnt accept his rebrand but I would understand why others chose to embrace it all and him.If I am right IF then why do people embrace him so willingly.
I Used the word put in as im not sure where the money has come from,but the main point here is as you say the interset rate he is charging.
As i have said to many people - VT - Is the borrower and the funder in this deal .
The Griff wrote:prob butttimdog80 wrote:The Griff wrote:since62 wrote:Igovernor wrote:It's his own money, not loaned and not from any of his companies
That`s not true though is it?
At least part of the loans put in to CCFC Holdings has been through two offshore companies , Edgedale International and Erskine Finance. It says so in the company accounts and at Companies House.
I don`t know who owns the shares in the Singapore registered Edgedale whose registered office is an accomodation address in the business district of Singapore. Erskine is a bit more of a mystery as a UK company with an identical name was dissolved about 10 years ago and the charge document given by CCFC to that company wasn`t properly registered so where Erskine has its registered address has not been disclosed.
The above two companies are as mysterious as Langstone , so it is not correct to say all the money invested to date is VT`s personal funds.
Since 62
were does peter lim live , the reds fan who tried buying liverpool ,, whats the current ceo chairman surname mate
Aint it Simon Lim- His son??
2blue2handle wrote:Did anyone care where it came from when he saved us from liquidation?
Do we ever knew? Where did SAMs money come from?
timdog80 wrote:The Griff wrote:prob butttimdog80 wrote:The Griff wrote:since62 wrote:Igovernor wrote:It's his own money, not loaned and not from any of his companies
That`s not true though is it?
At least part of the loans put in to CCFC Holdings has been through two offshore companies , Edgedale International and Erskine Finance. It says so in the company accounts and at Companies House.
I don`t know who owns the shares in the Singapore registered Edgedale whose registered office is an accomodation address in the business district of Singapore. Erskine is a bit more of a mystery as a UK company with an identical name was dissolved about 10 years ago and the charge document given by CCFC to that company wasn`t properly registered so where Erskine has its registered address has not been disclosed.
The above two companies are as mysterious as Langstone , so it is not correct to say all the money invested to date is VT`s personal funds.
Since 62
were does peter lim live , the reds fan who tried buying liverpool ,, whats the current ceo chairman surname mate
Aint it Simon Lim- His son??
Just checked it appears peter lims son is 19 or 20 so ITS NOT HIM![]()
![]()
Peter Lim:
http://www.sportingintelligence.com/201 ... bn-111006/
...BUT im sure ive read there a connection between the two though??
wez1927 wrote:2blue2handle wrote:Did anyone care where it came from when he saved us from liquidation?
Do we ever knew? Where did SAMs money come from?
every football owner puts there money through a company its standard practice ,ie arsenal owner is red,white ltd
EL JEFE wrote::(![]()
![]()
There is no contract verbal or written, that states any monies paid into CCFC is charged at 7% interest, I have said before thats from a friend who I trust and respect, that I would not divulge where that information came from, and I still won't, so don't ask or give me any sarcasm, I don't give a rats arse if you don't believe me, just don't insult my source.
wez1927 wrote:Keith is the bulk of the monies loaned from vt ,tg or family ? Or is it from the finance.companies ? ,do youthink the finance companies could be.the new directors companies who recently come on board one being the owner of the biggest pay per view channel on China ? Do you think we.will have a take over in the summer by a chinese consortium
GrangeEndStar wrote:'Joachim, you will never bileef vot ze jack-unt-ratboy scum haff in zer Uber-Slum? Ze filthy gypo schweinhunds only haff ze house zat looks like ze Fuehrer. Gott In Himmel. Gass zem all at vunce!!"
All Black Everything. wrote:Peter Lim also tried to buy Liverpool who also play in red. After that never happened he tried to buy a substantial stake in Manchester United which never materialised.
Peter Lim is also known for marketing Manchester United massively in Asia so if Tan is getting advice from him then it does explain why we are now red. He has a degree in accountancy so he knows the numbers game better than most of us when it comes to business as well as the laws.
Users browsing this forum: Amazonbot [Bot], Blex [Bot], Blue since 1981, bluebirdoct1962, BlueView, BRIAN THE BOOKIE, claudebot, davids, DotBot [Bot], Google [Bot], ias [Bot], Meta [bot], MillenniumNova, pembroke allan and 294 guests