Carl Curtis Says It looks like Sour Grapes/Unforgivable perf

Carl Curtis Says It looks like Sour Grapes
link
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/foot ... re-6968395

Unforgivable performance against Palace, but Ole should be given more time.
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/foot ... re-6968395


Carl Curtis Says " Ole Gunnar Solskjaer needs to be given more time. "

I cant believe that supposed intelligent people can miss the point of this whole debacle so much.

It is not about sour grapes, it is not about the result against palace....it is about the integrity of the game. If we had won 5-0 i would expect the club to act in the exact same way.

I expected better from you Carl.

Carl do you understand what the word integrity means buddy sour grapes or not there is a line you don't cross

Carl, in my opinion you are way off the mark and have totally missed the point here. Nothing to do with results or sour grapes. It is about integrity.

Carl in the 7 games since the defeat to Hull City only 3 players have featured in the starting 11 for ALL those games, Marshall, Caulker and Campbell. Only 2 players featured in 6 of the starting 11, Medel and Fabio and only 1, Mutch featured in 5 of the starting 11. In fact over those 7 games OGS has used 20 different players in the starting 11.

I have to disagree that most Cardiff fans could have guessed 9 of the starting line up based on way that OGS has chopped and changed the starting 11 over those games.

If you look at the starting 11 of both the Hull City and Palace games, both hugely disappointing performances from the team, other than the obvious Marshall, Caulker and Campbell there were 3 other players who started both games Taylor, Jones and Zaha.

Taylor, Jones and Zaha had bad games against Hull and in the case of Zaha and Jones only Jones had started in any of the other games. So the question is would any City fan really expect those two to start the game.

In my opinion you could have confidence in only 6 players starting last week, Marshall, Caulker, Campbell, Fabio, Mutch and Medal, with Fabio injured only 5 were available. The rest given OGS chopping and changing was anyones guess but Jones and Zaha were well down the list.

So why did they start.

clueless article.

What a load of f*cking nonsense

What a load of nonsense.

it would have been better all round if the club had said nothing but i believe the issue has been raised because it involves moody which brings into question his integrity which in turn reflects on malky and will only add fuel to the fire in tans legal battle against malky over the summer signing of cornelius and brayford etc.
regardless of moodys behaviour ole should have enough confidence in his players ability to beat a team like palace even if they knew the starting line up the night before and if ole did change the team because of it then as far as i am concerned that tells you everything you need to know about his management capabilities.

anybody else notice the sponsor down the bottom of the article. hmmmmm!

anybody else notice the sponsor down the bottom of the article. hmmmmm!

So what?

Makes me think you're being told what to write.An agenda driven article if I ever saw one.

anybody else notice the sponsor down the bottom of the article. hmmmmm!

He has been doing it for months, nothing wrong with promoting company

Sour grapes. What a ridiculous notion. Honesty, reliability, integrity and trust are just a few words to describe the situation.

It must be sour grapes if Carl said it is he is god isn't he !!

Carl must be on holiday and his assistant has wrote the article lol

Who is the sponsor? If its anyone having a dig at the club, i would agree that its odd!

it would have been better all round if the club had said nothing but i believe the issue has been raised because it involves moody which brings into question his integrity which in turn reflects on malky and will only add fuel to the fire in tans legal battle against malky over the summer signing of cornelius and brayford etc.
regardless of moodys behaviour ole should have enough confidence in his players ability to beat a team like palace even if they knew the starting line up the night before and if ole did change the team because of it then as far as i am concerned that tells you everything you need to know about his management capabilities.

Agreed. No disrespect to palace who will be playing above us next year but they are not one of the better teams we've played. Ole has stated about changing his team to suit better opposition which is understandable but I believe our best eleven fit and well should beat palaces at home 9 out of 10 times. If this mole stuff as any relevance he should have had the courage of his convictions and stuck with his team. It's been stated on this site so many times about his tinkering but that was the strangest team he's selected so far. No point blaming palace blame lies with ole and players.

correct me if im wrong but doesnt carl say the HEADLINES in the national press make it look like sour grapes...

It's not suprising that article though isit really.

Mr update would want as many leaky pipes as possible in our club

it would have been better all round if the club had said nothing but i believe the issue has been raised because it involves moody which brings into question his integrity which in turn reflects on malky and will only add fuel to the fire in tans legal battle against malky over the summer signing of cornelius and brayford etc.
regardless of moodys behaviour ole should have enough confidence in his players ability to beat a team like palace even if they knew the starting line up the night before and if ole did change the team because of it then as far as i am concerned that tells you everything you need to know about his management capabilities.

Agreed. No disrespect to palace who will be playing above us next year but they are not one of the better teams we've played. Ole has stated about changing his team to suit better opposition which is understandable but I believe our best eleven fit and well should beat palaces at home 9 out of 10 times. If this mole stuff as any relevance he should have had the courage of his convictions and stuck with his team. It's been stated on this site so many times about his tinkering but that was the strangest team he's selected so far. No point blaming palace blame lies with ole and players.

Let's give Palace a bit of credit.....they beat us home and away 6 Points.

Carl, sorry fella but what planet are you on?

Carl, sorry fella but what planet are you on?

I think he's on the planet of defend Moody in order to defend Malky in order to attack Tan. Its a little known planet that orbits Urannis

Carl, sorry fella but what planet are you on?

Terrible article,don't give up the day job.

correct me if im wrong but doesnt carl say the HEADLINES in the national press make it look like sour grapes...

Read the headline of this topic.

Carl Curtis Says It looks like Sour Grapes
link
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/foot ... re-6968395

Unforgivable performance against Palace, but Ole should be given more time.
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/foot ... re-6968395


Carl Curtis Says " Ole Gunnar Solskjaer needs to be given more time. "

Carl was he your mole to?

Carl Curtis Says It looks like Sour Grapes
link
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/foot ... re-6968395

Unforgivable performance against Palace, but Ole should be given more time.
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/sport/foot ... re-6968395


Carl Curtis Says " Ole Gunnar Solskjaer needs to be given more time. "

Sour Grapes?
It doesn't matter how much its twisted the bottom line is if people are leaking out private information from within the club they should be exposed and punished..

correct me if im wrong but doesnt carl say the HEADLINES in the national press make it look like sour grapes...

Read the headline of this topic.

i read what is in the article

correct me if im wrong but doesnt carl say the HEADLINES in the national press make it look like sour grapes...

Read the headline of this topic.

i read what is in the article

Good on you.

correct me if im wrong but doesnt carl say the HEADLINES in the national press make it look like sour grapes...

Read the headline of this topic.

i read what is in the article

Good on you.

I was reading between the lines