Mon Mar 31, 2014 10:43 pm
<12th man
Mon Mar 31, 2014 10:48 pm
Mon Mar 31, 2014 10:55 pm
Tonteg Bluebird wrote:I hope we stay up but we could have easily had this stability you're talking about this season, but Tan chose to destabilise things. If we go down it is all Vincent Tan's fault, no doubt about that whatsoever imo.
Mon Mar 31, 2014 10:55 pm
Tonteg Bluebird wrote:I hope we stay up but we could have easily had this stability you're talking about this season, but Tan chose to destabilise things. If we go down it is all Vincent Tan's fault, no doubt about that whatsoever imo.
Mon Mar 31, 2014 11:04 pm
Bluebird86 wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:I hope we stay up but we could have easily had this stability you're talking about this season, but Tan chose to destabilise things. If we go down it is all Vincent Tan's fault, no doubt about that whatsoever imo.
It's not the last minute goals we conceded but tans fault
Mon Mar 31, 2014 11:06 pm
Tonteg Bluebird wrote:I hope we stay up but we could have easily had this stability you're talking about this season, but Tan chose to destabilise things. If we go down it is all Vincent Tan's fault, no doubt about that whatsoever imo.
Mon Mar 31, 2014 11:14 pm
Tonteg Bluebird wrote:Bluebird86 wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:I hope we stay up but we could have easily had this stability you're talking about this season, but Tan chose to destabilise things. If we go down it is all Vincent Tan's fault, no doubt about that whatsoever imo.
It's not the last minute goals we conceded but tans fault
The last minute goals were a result of several off the pitch disruptions leading to disjointed performances caused by team interference and a drastic transformation of management and playing style. All Tan's fault.
Mon Mar 31, 2014 11:16 pm
Tonteg Bluebird wrote:Bluebird86 wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:I hope we stay up but we could have easily had this stability you're talking about this season, but Tan chose to destabilise things. If we go down it is all Vincent Tan's fault, no doubt about that whatsoever imo.
It's not the last minute goals we conceded but tans fault
The last minute goals were a result of several off the pitch disruptions leading to disjointed performances caused by team interference and a drastic transformation of management and playing style. All Tan's fault.
Mon Mar 31, 2014 11:17 pm
Bluebird86 wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:Bluebird86 wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:I hope we stay up but we could have easily had this stability you're talking about this season, but Tan chose to destabilise things. If we go down it is all Vincent Tan's fault, no doubt about that whatsoever imo.
It's not the last minute goals we conceded but tans fault
The last minute goals were a result of several off the pitch disruptions leading to disjointed performances caused by team interference and a drastic transformation of management and playing style. All Tan's fault.
So it only affected them in the 93rd minute.
Is it also tans fault that we haven't had a pen all season.
Don't talk so f*cking wet.
Mon Mar 31, 2014 11:21 pm
soulofthesea wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:Bluebird86 wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:I hope we stay up but we could have easily had this stability you're talking about this season, but Tan chose to destabilise things. If we go down it is all Vincent Tan's fault, no doubt about that whatsoever imo.
It's not the last minute goals we conceded but tans fault
The last minute goals were a result of several off the pitch disruptions leading to disjointed performances caused by team interference and a drastic transformation of management and playing style. All Tan's fault.
ah rite got it. so Tan equalised last Saturday?
Matts will be pissed, 1st prem goal an all
Tue Apr 01, 2014 12:33 am
Woodville Willie wrote:Before anyone says it: Yes, I know that Wigan went down last year!
What I mean is that Wigan, especially under Martinez built a reputation for tenacity under huge odds. They seemed to be doomed at times but always (except last year) managed to survive. This is the sort of determination The Bluebirds need from now until the final whistle of the final game.
Talk of 8 to 9 points is probably mega safe because the threshold for survival is likely to be very low this year. The one thing that can't happen is teams around us to beat top clubs and of course us!
We have quality players and a very motivated manager so it's up to the 12th man to make a difference like the home crowd in that first magical game against Man City. Capture that and we have a great chance.
Now assuming we stay, next season needs to be one of stability and development. We are likely to lose a couple of stars to bigger clubs so scouting will be key.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
<12th man
Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:56 am
Tonteg Bluebird wrote:soulofthesea wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:Bluebird86 wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:I hope we stay up but we could have easily had this stability you're talking about this season, but Tan chose to destabilise things. If we go down it is all Vincent Tan's fault, no doubt about that whatsoever imo.
It's not the last minute goals we conceded but tans fault
The last minute goals were a result of several off the pitch disruptions leading to disjointed performances caused by team interference and a drastic transformation of management and playing style. All Tan's fault.
ah rite got it. so Tan equalised last Saturday?
Matts will be pissed, 1st prem goal an all
You haven't understood my post have you. I'm saying the reason we've conceded so many goals and lost so many games this season is because of Tan's interference disjointing things. If we had stability this season, we would be higher up the table without a doubt imo.
Tue Apr 01, 2014 7:29 am
Tue Apr 01, 2014 7:32 am
Tue Apr 01, 2014 7:57 am
Tue Apr 01, 2014 7:59 am
Tonteg Bluebird wrote:Bluebird86 wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:I hope we stay up but we could have easily had this stability you're talking about this season, but Tan chose to destabilise things. If we go down it is all Vincent Tan's fault, no doubt about that whatsoever imo.
It's not the last minute goals we conceded but tans fault
The last minute goals were a result of several off the pitch disruptions leading to disjointed performances caused by team interference and a drastic transformation of management and playing style. All Tan's fault.
Tue Apr 01, 2014 8:04 am
2blue2handle wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:Bluebird86 wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:I hope we stay up but we could have easily had this stability you're talking about this season, but Tan chose to destabilise things. If we go down it is all Vincent Tan's fault, no doubt about that whatsoever imo.
It's not the last minute goals we conceded but tans fault
The last minute goals were a result of several off the pitch disruptions leading to disjointed performances caused by team interference and a drastic transformation of management and playing style. All Tan's fault.
Are you serious the things you come out with or do you say things for comedy value?
Tue Apr 01, 2014 8:48 am
Tonteg Bluebird wrote:
The last minute goals were a result of several off the pitch disruptions leading to disjointed performances caused by team interference and a drastic transformation of management and playing style. All Tan's fault.
Tue Apr 01, 2014 9:00 am
Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:41 pm
2blue2handle wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:Bluebird86 wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:I hope we stay up but we could have easily had this stability you're talking about this season, but Tan chose to destabilise things. If we go down it is all Vincent Tan's fault, no doubt about that whatsoever imo.
It's not the last minute goals we conceded but tans fault
The last minute goals were a result of several off the pitch disruptions leading to disjointed performances caused by team interference and a drastic transformation of management and playing style. All Tan's fault.
Are you serious the things you come out with or do you say things for comedy value?
Tue Apr 01, 2014 1:45 pm
Barry Chuckle wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:
The last minute goals were a result of several off the pitch disruptions leading to disjointed performances caused by team interference and a drastic transformation of management and playing style. All Tan's fault.
Going by that then, should we stay up, that will all be down to Vincent Tan too?
Tue Apr 01, 2014 2:50 pm
Tonteg Bluebird wrote:Bluebird86 wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:I hope we stay up but we could have easily had this stability you're talking about this season, but Tan chose to destabilise things. If we go down it is all Vincent Tan's fault, no doubt about that whatsoever imo.
It's not the last minute goals we conceded but tans fault
The last minute goals were a result of several off the pitch disruptions leading to disjointed performances caused by team interference and a drastic transformation of management and playing style. All Tan's fault.
Wed Apr 02, 2014 11:51 am
Wed Apr 02, 2014 1:07 pm
2blue2handle wrote:I think Malky, Tan and Ole will all have to take responsibility.
Malky just wasnt up to it and wasted a load of money
Tan took to long to sack Malky
Ole hasnt been able to turn it around quick enough.
Wed Apr 02, 2014 2:18 pm
Tonteg Bluebird wrote:2blue2handle wrote:I think Malky, Tan and Ole will all have to take responsibility.
Malky just wasnt up to it and wasted a load of money
Tan took to long to sack Malky
Ole hasnt been able to turn it around quick enough.
We were never in the relegation zone under Malky apart from the first day of the season. We started the season well and we were doing fine until Tan started interfering. Still, we beat West Brom 1-0 and Malky keeps us above the relegation zone without any major concerns. Then what happens? The email, Kerslake stepping in to the interview at the last second, questions about Malky's future, more disruption causing the 3-0 Southampton defeat and once the damage was done by Tan, Malky was then sacked.
We then throw away 2 crucial points home to Sunderland, then when Ole is appointed, we lose home to West Ham and fall into the relegation zone. You say Ole hasn't been able to turn it around quick enough? We have fallen into the relegation zone and haven't been able to get out since Ole took charge! This isn't Ole's fault however. Malky did his bit keeping us above the relegation zone. But the problem is all Tan. Ole's style is the exact opposite to Malky. Malky likes his teams to be an organised, disciplined unit who can stick to a game plan to achieve results. Ole prefers to play more open, expansive football which allows us to create and score more, but leaves us vulnerable at the back.
It was absolute madness by Tan to bring in a manager who plays this style of football against superior teams with superior players. It's absolute crazy, especially half way through the season where there's little opportunity to turn the playing squad around! This is why we are where we are. Ole can't change his style, he sticks to his methods and beliefs that brought him success with Molde in the past and rightly so. But it's Tan's fault for putting Ole into this position. I firmly believe we would have stayed up under Malky. But I will not blame Ole if we get relegated, there will only be one man to blame in my opinion and that's Tan.
Wed Apr 02, 2014 4:35 pm
Wed Apr 02, 2014 6:05 pm
Pontyclun Blue wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:2blue2handle wrote:I think Malky, Tan and Ole will all have to take responsibility.
Malky just wasnt up to it and wasted a load of money
Tan took to long to sack Malky
Ole hasnt been able to turn it around quick enough.
We were never in the relegation zone under Malky apart from the first day of the season. We started the season well and we were doing fine until Tan started interfering. Still, we beat West Brom 1-0 and Malky keeps us above the relegation zone without any major concerns. Then what happens? The email, Kerslake stepping in to the interview at the last second, questions about Malky's future, more disruption causing the 3-0 Southampton defeat and once the damage was done by Tan, Malky was then sacked.
We then throw away 2 crucial points home to Sunderland, then when Ole is appointed, we lose home to West Ham and fall into the relegation zone. You say Ole hasn't been able to turn it around quick enough? We have fallen into the relegation zone and haven't been able to get out since Ole took charge! This isn't Ole's fault however. Malky did his bit keeping us above the relegation zone. But the problem is all Tan. Ole's style is the exact opposite to Malky. Malky likes his teams to be an organised, disciplined unit who can stick to a game plan to achieve results. Ole prefers to play more open, expansive football which allows us to create and score more, but leaves us vulnerable at the back.
It was absolute madness by Tan to bring in a manager who plays this style of football against superior teams with superior players. It's absolute crazy, especially half way through the season where there's little opportunity to turn the playing squad around! This is why we are where we are. Ole can't change his style, he sticks to his methods and beliefs that brought him success with Molde in the past and rightly so. But it's Tan's fault for putting Ole into this position. I firmly believe we would have stayed up under Malky. But I will not blame Ole if we get relegated, there will only be one man to blame in my opinion and that's Tan.
On August 24th we were in 19th place, get your facts right![]()
http://www.premierleague.com/en-gb/matc ... _STANDINGS
Wed Apr 02, 2014 9:21 pm
Tonteg Bluebird wrote:Pontyclun Blue wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:2blue2handle wrote:I think Malky, Tan and Ole will all have to take responsibility.
Malky just wasnt up to it and wasted a load of money
Tan took to long to sack Malky
Ole hasnt been able to turn it around quick enough.
We were never in the relegation zone under Malky apart from the first day of the season. We started the season well and we were doing fine until Tan started interfering. Still, we beat West Brom 1-0 and Malky keeps us above the relegation zone without any major concerns. Then what happens? The email, Kerslake stepping in to the interview at the last second, questions about Malky's future, more disruption causing the 3-0 Southampton defeat and once the damage was done by Tan, Malky was then sacked.
We then throw away 2 crucial points home to Sunderland, then when Ole is appointed, we lose home to West Ham and fall into the relegation zone. You say Ole hasn't been able to turn it around quick enough? We have fallen into the relegation zone and haven't been able to get out since Ole took charge! This isn't Ole's fault however. Malky did his bit keeping us above the relegation zone. But the problem is all Tan. Ole's style is the exact opposite to Malky. Malky likes his teams to be an organised, disciplined unit who can stick to a game plan to achieve results. Ole prefers to play more open, expansive football which allows us to create and score more, but leaves us vulnerable at the back.
It was absolute madness by Tan to bring in a manager who plays this style of football against superior teams with superior players. It's absolute crazy, especially half way through the season where there's little opportunity to turn the playing squad around! This is why we are where we are. Ole can't change his style, he sticks to his methods and beliefs that brought him success with Molde in the past and rightly so. But it's Tan's fault for putting Ole into this position. I firmly believe we would have stayed up under Malky. But I will not blame Ole if we get relegated, there will only be one man to blame in my opinion and that's Tan.
On August 24th we were in 19th place, get your facts right![]()
http://www.premierleague.com/en-gb/matc ... _STANDINGS
Lets move it on a day after we win our game in hand against Man City shall we.![]()
http://www.premierleague.com/en-gb/matc ... _STANDINGS
Wed Apr 02, 2014 9:35 pm
Tonteg Bluebird wrote:2blue2handle wrote:I think Malky, Tan and Ole will all have to take responsibility.
Malky just wasnt up to it and wasted a load of money
Tan took to long to sack Malky
Ole hasnt been able to turn it around quick enough.
We were never in the relegation zone under Malky apart from the first day of the season. We started the season well and we were doing fine until Tan started interfering. Still, we beat West Brom 1-0 and Malky keeps us above the relegation zone without any major concerns. Then what happens? The email, Kerslake stepping in to the interview at the last second, questions about Malky's future, more disruption causing the 3-0 Southampton defeat and once the damage was done by Tan, Malky was then sacked.
We then throw away 2 crucial points home to Sunderland, then when Ole is appointed, we lose home to West Ham and fall into the relegation zone. You say Ole hasn't been able to turn it around quick enough? We have fallen into the relegation zone and haven't been able to get out since Ole took charge! This isn't Ole's fault however. Malky did his bit keeping us above the relegation zone. But the problem is all Tan. Ole's style is the exact opposite to Malky. Malky likes his teams to be an organised, disciplined unit who can stick to a game plan to achieve results. Ole prefers to play more open, expansive football which allows us to create and score more, but leaves us vulnerable at the back.
It was absolute madness by Tan to bring in a manager who plays this style of football against superior teams with superior players. It's absolute crazy, especially half way through the season where there's little opportunity to turn the playing squad around! This is why we are where we are. Ole can't change his style, he sticks to his methods and beliefs that brought him success with Molde in the past and rightly so. But it's Tan's fault for putting Ole into this position. I firmly believe we would have stayed up under Malky. But I will not blame Ole if we get relegated, there will only be one man to blame in my opinion and that's Tan.
Thu Apr 03, 2014 7:02 am
llandaffbluebird1 wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:soulofthesea wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:Bluebird86 wrote:Tonteg Bluebird wrote:I hope we stay up but we could have easily had this stability you're talking about this season, but Tan chose to destabilise things. If we go down it is all Vincent Tan's fault, no doubt about that whatsoever imo.
It's not the last minute goals we conceded but tans fault
The last minute goals were a result of several off the pitch disruptions leading to disjointed performances caused by team interference and a drastic transformation of management and playing style. All Tan's fault.
ah rite got it. so Tan equalised last Saturday?
Matts will be pissed, 1st prem goal an all
You haven't understood my post have you. I'm saying the reason we've conceded so many goals and lost so many games this season is because of Tan's interference disjointing things. If we had stability this season, we would be higher up the table without a doubt imo.
No it's not. Liverpool and Southampton you have a case with but not most of our matches (I doubt we'd have won them anyway without the interference maybe a point out of Southampton and that is it) The reason we have been so bad this season is poor transfers and naive tactics.