Sat Dec 01, 2012 7:49 pm
Sat Dec 01, 2012 7:59 pm
Sat Dec 01, 2012 8:02 pm
OhhhGa wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-20559585
We should do something similar (in my opinion).
Sat Dec 01, 2012 8:05 pm
Sat Dec 01, 2012 8:17 pm
Willy the Wombat wrote:OhhhGa wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-20559585
We should do something similar (in my opinion).
What a crook of shite, more left wing control freak nonsense. It's peoples choice whether they smoke or not, no one forces them to smoke. I find it incredible that a so called government can be so stupid to think changing the presentation of the packets will stop people smoking. Whoever thought of this should be sacked on the spot, they're obviouslt mentally retarded and shouldn't be allowed off the ward without adult supervision....
Sat Dec 01, 2012 8:18 pm
Willy the Wombat wrote:OhhhGa wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-20559585
We should do something similar (in my opinion).
What a crook of shite, more left wing control freak nonsense. It's peoples choice whether they smoke or not, no one forces them to smoke. I find it incredible that a so called government can be so stupid to think changing the presentation of the packets will stop people smoking. Whoever thought of this should be sacked on the spot, they're obviouslt mentally retarded and shouldn't be allowed off the ward without adult supervision....
Sat Dec 01, 2012 8:20 pm
hywel wrote:Willy the Wombat wrote:OhhhGa wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-20559585
We should do something similar (in my opinion).
What a crook of shite, more left wing control freak nonsense. It's peoples choice whether they smoke or not, no one forces them to smoke. I find it incredible that a so called government can be so stupid to think changing the presentation of the packets will stop people smoking. Whoever thought of this should be sacked on the spot, they're obviouslt mentally retarded and shouldn't be allowed off the ward without adult supervision....
It's still their choice to smoke or not, if they really want to then they can just ask for them. The pictures only show the reality of smoking and there is no reason it shouldn't be on there. And nobody really cares about smokers because it is their choice, but they are trying to prevent people suffering from secondary smoke, like children.
Sat Dec 01, 2012 8:36 pm
Bridgend_bluebird wrote:hywel wrote:Willy the Wombat wrote:OhhhGa wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-20559585
We should do something similar (in my opinion).
What a crook of shite, more left wing control freak nonsense. It's peoples choice whether they smoke or not, no one forces them to smoke. I find it incredible that a so called government can be so stupid to think changing the presentation of the packets will stop people smoking. Whoever thought of this should be sacked on the spot, they're obviouslt mentally retarded and shouldn't be allowed off the ward without adult supervision....
It's still their choice to smoke or not, if they really want to then they can just ask for them. The pictures only show the reality of smoking and there is no reason it shouldn't be on there. And nobody really cares about smokers because it is their choice, but they are trying to prevent people suffering from secondary smoke, like children.
No point replying, he's a blithering buffoon with an agenda against Labour. He's a typical, ignorant Tory and doesn't realise that this could save peoples live because he's been blinded by his own ignorance and is still mind set in the Thatcher era.
Sat Dec 01, 2012 8:44 pm
Sat Dec 01, 2012 8:45 pm
Willy the Wombat wrote:Bridgend_bluebird wrote:hywel wrote:Willy the Wombat wrote:OhhhGa wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-20559585
We should do something similar (in my opinion).
What a crook of shite, more left wing control freak nonsense. It's peoples choice whether they smoke or not, no one forces them to smoke. I find it incredible that a so called government can be so stupid to think changing the presentation of the packets will stop people smoking. Whoever thought of this should be sacked on the spot, they're obviouslt mentally retarded and shouldn't be allowed off the ward without adult supervision....
It's still their choice to smoke or not, if they really want to then they can just ask for them. The pictures only show the reality of smoking and there is no reason it shouldn't be on there. And nobody really cares about smokers because it is their choice, but they are trying to prevent people suffering from secondary smoke, like children.
No point replying, he's a blithering buffoon with an agenda against Labour. He's a typical, ignorant Tory and doesn't realise that this could save peoples live because he's been blinded by his own ignorance and is still mind set in the Thatcher era.
![]()
Touched a nerve BB...
Sat Dec 01, 2012 8:50 pm
Willy the Wombat wrote:OhhhGa wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-20559585
We should do something similar (in my opinion).
What a crook of shite, more left wing control freak nonsense. It's peoples choice whether they smoke or not, no one forces them to smoke. I find it incredible that a so called government can be so stupid to think changing the presentation of the packets will stop people smoking. Whoever thought of this should be sacked on the spot, they're obviouslt mentally retarded and shouldn't be allowed off the ward without adult supervision....
Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:27 pm
Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:38 pm
Sun Dec 02, 2012 10:01 am
Sun Dec 02, 2012 10:12 am
Sun Dec 02, 2012 10:45 am
Sun Dec 02, 2012 12:36 pm
Angry Man wrote:I do like the idea because I hate smoking.
However lets get the facts straight on this before the debates come to an end.
The is no real evidence that passive smoking actually makes a difference. All throughout my time in the Council I was constantly putting these myths to bed because Smokers aren't allowed to adopt anymore in many Labour local authorities so they would actually prefer to leave children without a home because a member of a potential loving family is a smoker.
Also on average smokers actually pay 4 times as much tax than a non smoker so the health bill is heavily helped by them.
Once again I'd like to state that I hate smoking but popular myths started by people with another agenda need to be put to bed on this issue.
Sun Dec 02, 2012 12:54 pm
Bluebird since 1948 wrote:Angry Man wrote:I do like the idea because I hate smoking.
However lets get the facts straight on this before the debates come to an end.
The is no real evidence that passive smoking actually makes a difference. All throughout my time in the Council I was constantly putting these myths to bed because Smokers aren't allowed to adopt anymore in many Labour local authorities so they would actually prefer to leave children without a home because a member of a potential loving family is a smoker.
Also on average smokers actually pay 4 times as much tax than a non smoker so the health bill is heavily helped by them.
Once again I'd like to state that I hate smoking but popular myths started by people with another agenda need to be put to bed on this issue.
Here there, there are so many hoops you have to jump through to adopt a child it puts most off. I am an ex-labour voter, it's the nanny state and PC brigade that we had for 13 years that have driven me away and I am afraid that unless they go back to their roots I will not vote for them again.
![]()
Sun Dec 02, 2012 5:45 pm
Bridgend_bluebird wrote:Willy the Wombat wrote:Bridgend_bluebird wrote:hywel wrote:Willy the Wombat wrote:OhhhGa wrote:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-20559585
We should do something similar (in my opinion).
What a crook of shite, more left wing control freak nonsense. It's peoples choice whether they smoke or not, no one forces them to smoke. I find it incredible that a so called government can be so stupid to think changing the presentation of the packets will stop people smoking. Whoever thought of this should be sacked on the spot, they're obviouslt mentally retarded and shouldn't be allowed off the ward without adult supervision....
It's still their choice to smoke or not, if they really want to then they can just ask for them. The pictures only show the reality of smoking and there is no reason it shouldn't be on there. And nobody really cares about smokers because it is their choice, but they are trying to prevent people suffering from secondary smoke, like children.
No point replying, he's a blithering buffoon with an agenda against Labour. He's a typical, ignorant Tory and doesn't realise that this could save peoples live because he's been blinded by his own ignorance and is still mind set in the Thatcher era.
![]()
Touched a nerve BB...
No, just your constant obsession with the Left wing is massively tedious and gets rather irritating.
Sun Dec 02, 2012 5:48 pm
Sun Dec 02, 2012 6:13 pm
Sun Dec 02, 2012 6:15 pm
Sun Dec 02, 2012 6:19 pm
sloper_road_legend wrote:Australians care about their country, the governments allow there people to make a good living they pay them good money and they live comfortably...
you earn around 800 dollers a week working in a call centre in autralia.
in the UK u get payed 7.00 an hour, you live in poverty making just enough to pay your bills, and choose whether you want to drive a car or have 1 holiday once a yr and a few nights out.
Sun Dec 02, 2012 6:23 pm
Bluebird since 1948 wrote:sloper_road_legend wrote:Australians care about their country, the governments allow there people to make a good living they pay them good money and they live comfortably...
you earn around 800 dollers a week working in a call centre in autralia.
in the UK u get payed 7.00 an hour, you live in poverty making just enough to pay your bills, and choose whether you want to drive a car or have 1 holiday once a yr and a few nights out.
It should be said that the reason they get paid 800 dollars a week working in a call centre is because the cost of living over there is obscene and much higher than it is here.
Sun Dec 02, 2012 6:31 pm
Sun Dec 02, 2012 6:39 pm
Sun Dec 02, 2012 6:44 pm
OhhhGa wrote:I wouldn't say I was 'left-wing' by the way. The term itself is ambiguous, vague and often not applicable to modern society/politics.
Sun Dec 02, 2012 6:46 pm
OhhhGa wrote:I wouldn't say I was 'left-wing' by the way. The term itself is ambiguous, vague and often not applicable to modern society/politics.
Sun Dec 02, 2012 6:46 pm
Bluebird since 1948 wrote:OhhhGa wrote:I wouldn't say I was 'left-wing' by the way. The term itself is ambiguous, vague and often not applicable to modern society/politics.
No your posts are so far to the lunatic left wing that they are falling off the screen.
Sun Dec 02, 2012 6:49 pm
Angry Man wrote:OhhhGa wrote:I wouldn't say I was 'left-wing' by the way. The term itself is ambiguous, vague and often not applicable to modern society/politics.
Come on OhhhGa you know only too well that your posts are left wing hense of my surprise that you wanted to study in the America!!!!