Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Angry Man

Wed Nov 21, 2012 1:01 pm

I see he's back on the forum, mind you..........It is Panto season and he is pure theatre :lol: :ayatollah:

But....I wonder has he apologised to Taffy Apple after his over the top rant last time.

Re: Angry Man

Wed Nov 21, 2012 1:06 pm

What he said to TA was out of order but hes had things said to him way below the belt too.

TA has been on a seasoned campaigner on many a forum / banter board, and some (ITK and AWOL) were far worse for abuse than this one, and I am sure did not not take it personally.

Re: Angry Man

Wed Nov 21, 2012 2:00 pm

Mario Polotelli wrote:What he said to TA was out of order but hes had things said to him way below the belt too.

TA has been on a seasoned campaigner on many a forum / banter board, and some (ITK and AWOL) were far worse for abuse than this one, and I am sure did not not take it personally.


Good site that was in the day ITK the city gent I noticed a regular on there !! Incredible looking back nearly every club in the UK had their own sites wasnt long before old bill started clocking it all.

Re: Angry Man

Wed Nov 21, 2012 2:39 pm

The only reason I haven't logged off completely is that I use this to get people to work. Unfortunately apart from one user who Ive been regular contact with it does seem that many unemployed people in the area enjoy a life of benefits.

Re: Angry Man

Wed Nov 21, 2012 3:23 pm

Angry Man wrote:The only reason I haven't logged off completely is that I use this to get people to work. Unfortunately apart from one user who Ive been regular contact with it does seem that many unemployed people in the area enjoy a life of benefits.


It's only so you can cream off of the top anyway. :?

Re: Angry Man

Wed Nov 21, 2012 3:31 pm

Mario Polotelli wrote:What he said to TA was out of order but hes had things said to him way below the belt too.

TA has been on a seasoned campaigner on many a forum / banter board, and some (ITK and AWOL) were far worse for abuse than this one, and I am sure did not not take it personally.


I didn't.

I do think the Cancer jibe was meant to 'kill two birds with one stone' though

Despicable

Re: Angry Man

Wed Nov 21, 2012 3:38 pm

SBF1 wrote:
Angry Man wrote:The only reason I haven't logged off completely is that I use this to get people to work. Unfortunately apart from one user who Ive been regular contact with it does seem that many unemployed people in the area enjoy a life of benefits.


It's only so you can cream off of the top anyway. :?


Welcome to the world of Capitalisum.If you dont like it then go self employed.

Re: Angry Man

Wed Nov 21, 2012 3:39 pm

Oh No He Has'nt...........

Re: Angry Man

Wed Nov 21, 2012 3:45 pm

Angry Man wrote:
SBF1 wrote:
Angry Man wrote:The only reason I haven't logged off completely is that I use this to get people to work. Unfortunately apart from one user who Ive been regular contact with it does seem that many unemployed people in the area enjoy a life of benefits.


It's only so you can cream off of the top anyway. :?


Welcome to the world of Capitalisum.If you dont like it then go self employed.


I already am. ;)

The thing is, you seem to imply you are doing people a favour.
Your in it for the money.

Re: Angry Man

Wed Nov 21, 2012 3:47 pm

SBF1 wrote:
Angry Man wrote:
SBF1 wrote:
Angry Man wrote:The only reason I haven't logged off completely is that I use this to get people to work. Unfortunately apart from one user who Ive been regular contact with it does seem that many unemployed people in the area enjoy a life of benefits.


It's only so you can cream off of the top anyway. :?


Welcome to the world of Capitalisum.If you dont like it then go self employed.


I already am. ;)

The thing is, you seem to imply you are doing people a favour.
Your in it for the money.


People do have a choice whether to work for me or not. Sorry but how many families are benefiting because you are giving a relative of theirs work..?

Re: Angry Man

Wed Nov 21, 2012 3:51 pm

Angry Man wrote:
SBF1 wrote:
Angry Man wrote:
SBF1 wrote:
Angry Man wrote:The only reason I haven't logged off completely is that I use this to get people to work. Unfortunately apart from one user who Ive been regular contact with it does seem that many unemployed people in the area enjoy a life of benefits.


It's only so you can cream off of the top anyway. :?


Welcome to the world of Capitalisum.If you dont like it then go self employed.


I already am. ;)

The thing is, you seem to imply you are doing people a favour.
Your in it for the money.


People do have a choice whether to work for me or not. Sorry but how many families are benefiting because you are giving a relative of theirs work..?


Two that I know of, but I don't take money off of them. I just got them jobs.

Re: Angry Man

Wed Nov 21, 2012 3:54 pm

SBF1 wrote:
Angry Man wrote:
SBF1 wrote:
Angry Man wrote:
SBF1 wrote:
Angry Man wrote:The only reason I haven't logged off completely is that I use this to get people to work. Unfortunately apart from one user who Ive been regular contact with it does seem that many unemployed people in the area enjoy a life of benefits.


It's only so you can cream off of the top anyway. :?


Welcome to the world of Capitalisum.If you dont like it then go self employed.


I already am. ;)

The thing is, you seem to imply you are doing people a favour.
Your in it for the money.


People do have a choice whether to work for me or not. Sorry but how many families are benefiting because you are giving a relative of theirs work..?


Two that I know of, but I don't take money off of them. I just got them jobs.


2!!!! compare that to over 40!!!! :lol:
What you need to remember is the people those two are working for will be making profit on the work which they will be doing.

Re: Angry Man

Wed Nov 21, 2012 4:00 pm

Welcome to the world of Capitalisum.If you dont like it then go self employed.[/quote]

I already am. ;)

The thing is, you seem to imply you are doing people a favour.
Your in it for the money.[/quote]

People do have a choice whether to work for me or not. Sorry but how many families are benefiting because you are giving a relative of theirs work..?[/quote]

Two that I know of, but I don't take money off of them. I just got them jobs.[/quote]

2!!!! compare that to over 40!!!! :lol:
What you need to remember is the people those two are working for will be making profit on the work which they will be doing.[/quote]

Of course they will.
I would never work for an agency though.
Find my own work and have all I earn.
Everyone should do the same in my opinion. ;)

Re: Angry Man

Wed Nov 21, 2012 4:11 pm

SBF1 wrote:Welcome to the world of Capitalisum.If you dont like it then go self employed.


I already am. ;)

The thing is, you seem to imply you are doing people a favour.
Your in it for the money.[/quote]

People do have a choice whether to work for me or not. Sorry but how many families are benefiting because you are giving a relative of theirs work..?[/quote]

Two that I know of, but I don't take money off of them. I just got them jobs.[/quote]

2!!!! compare that to over 40!!!! :lol:
What you need to remember is the people those two are working for will be making profit on the work which they will be doing.[/quote]

Of course they will.
I would never work for an agency though.
Find my own work and have all I earn.
Everyone should do the same in my opinion. ;)[/quote]

Well surely thats your choice and good for you for making that choice.
However there are other people in this world who don't really have the time or money to ring company after company in the yellow pages looking for work and there are many who simply dont have the contacts so their preferred choice is to work with an agency.
There are many who use agency work as a stop gap for a few days or just for overtime so in that case surely the individual and the agency are using each other for both their benefits.
Once again it seems that uneducated comments about my work are once again flawed by the truth.

Re: Angry Man

Wed Nov 21, 2012 4:17 pm

Of course they will.
I would never work for an agency though.
Find my own work and have all I earn.
Everyone should do the same in my opinion. ;)[/quote]

Well surely thats your choice and good for you for making that choice.
However there are other people in this world who don't really have the time or money to ring company after company in the yellow pages looking for work and there are many who simply dont have the contacts so their preferred choice is to work with an agency.
There are many who use agency work as a stop gap for a few days or just for overtime so in that case surely the individual and the agency are using each other for both their benefits.
Once again it seems that uneducated comments about my work are once again flawed by the truth.[/quote]

Not at all, my comments are based on past experience, and are a matter of my opinion, not uneducated as to what an agency is or does.

Re: Angry Man

Wed Nov 21, 2012 4:22 pm

SBF1 wrote:Of course they will.
I would never work for an agency though.
Find my own work and have all I earn.
Everyone should do the same in my opinion. ;)


Well surely thats your choice and good for you for making that choice.
However there are other people in this world who don't really have the time or money to ring company after company in the yellow pages looking for work and there are many who simply dont have the contacts so their preferred choice is to work with an agency.
There are many who use agency work as a stop gap for a few days or just for overtime so in that case surely the individual and the agency are using each other for both their benefits.
Once again it seems that uneducated comments about my work are once again flawed by the truth.[/quote]

Not at all, my comments are based on past experience, and are a matter of my opinion, not uneducated as to what an agency is or does.[/quote]

Sorry but unless you know the ins and out of the recruitment industry then in my opinion your comments are uneducated.

Re: Angry Man

Wed Nov 21, 2012 4:43 pm

Angry Man wrote:
SBF1 wrote:Of course they will.
I would never work for an agency though.
Find my own work and have all I earn.
Everyone should do the same in my opinion. ;)


Well surely thats your choice and good for you for making that choice.
However there are other people in this world who don't really have the time or money to ring company after company in the yellow pages looking for work and there are many who simply dont have the contacts so their preferred choice is to work with an agency.
There are many who use agency work as a stop gap for a few days or just for overtime so in that case surely the individual and the agency are using each other for both their benefits.
Once again it seems that uneducated comments about my work are once again flawed by the truth.


Not at all, my comments are based on past experience, and are a matter of my opinion, not uneducated as to what an agency is or does.[/quote]

Sorry but unless you know the ins and out of the recruitment industry then in my opinion your comments are uneducated.[/quote]
Welcome to the world of Capitalisum.If you dont like it then go self employed.

As is your spelling of capitalism.