Fri Oct 12, 2012 12:23 am
after steve kean was sacked from blackburn, alot of people said they where suprised, disapointed and think he should of been giving more time. now im not being funny, but for years with a relegation team, they've always hit midtable, steve kean comes in, and gets relegated his team. he lost the fans. i personally think he should of been sacked sooner. just think if we lost malky tomorrow, someone with no real previous experience steps in, gets us relegated would you all say he needs more time ?
on the other hand, i recently watched the BBC3's documentary on racism on football. john barnes tried to say that because he was black he wasnt given enough time at Tranmere and was sacked. even though he was in charge of 12 games, he lost 8, won 3. the results where disasterous. his players called him and jason makateer dumb and dumber, and lost the dressing room.
Fri Oct 12, 2012 12:49 am
A silly situation, they should have sacked him long ago.
They backed him in the summer knowing they were going to sack him unless results were amazing. Fcked up club.