Tan Furious

TG And Whitley not reached Langstone Agreement to make way for next investor.


http://www.pnefc.net/club/whos-who/

TG And Whitley not reached Langstone Agreement to make way for next investor.

Couldnt you put all this in one thread?

Put it all in one thread, jesus f*cking christ

Put it all in one thread, jesus f*cking christ

What you mean by one thread sorry.

Put it all in one thread, jesus f*cking christ

What you mean by one thread sorry.

Title the thread "BOARD ONGOINGS"


TAN FURIOUS


BLUEBIRD TO BE REMOVED

Confused not understand.

Confused not understand.

Come on now one thread your english is fine then the next thread youre speaking ENGERISH

TG And Whitley not reached Langstone Agreement to make way for next investor.

SO.......Im guessing VT would have set the max he's willing to allow TG and Whiltley to negotiate up to in order to get it settled??

So the question has to be asked.........What more could they have done to force Sam into a setttlement?

TG And Whitley not reached Langstone Agreement to make way for next investor.

SO.......Im guessing VT would have set the max he's willing to allow TG and Whiltley to negotiate up to in order to get it settled??

So the question has to be asked.........What more could they have done to force Sam into a setttlement?

Maybe you should reverse the question !

TG And Whitley not reached Langstone Agreement to make way for next investor.

SO.......Im guessing VT would have set the max he's willing to allow TG and Whiltley to negotiate up to in order to get it settled??

So the question has to be asked.........What more could they have done to force Sam into a setttlement?

Maybe you should reverse the question !

Not sure what you mean mate?

Are you saying tg and Whitley told VT the "reckon" they could get it settle for "X" amount and failed?? (as in they set the capped amount on a deal not VT?)

TG And Whitley not reached Langstone Agreement to make way for next investor.

SO.......Im guessing VT would have set the max he's willing to allow TG and Whiltley to negotiate up to in order to get it settled??

So the question has to be asked.........What more could they have done to force Sam into a setttlement?

Maybe you should reverse the question !

Not sure what you mean mate?

Are you saying tg and Whitley told VT the "reckon" they could get it settle for "X" amount and failed?? (as in they set the capped amount on a deal not VT?)

http://www.forbes.com/profile/peter-lim/

TG And Whitley not reached Langstone Agreement to make way for next investor.

SO.......Im guessing VT would have set the max he's willing to allow TG and Whiltley to negotiate up to in order to get it settled??

So the question has to be asked.........What more could they have done to force Sam into a setttlement?

Maybe you should reverse the question !

Not sure what you mean mate?

Are you saying tg and Whitley told VT the "reckon" they could get it settle for "X" amount and failed?? (as in they set the capped amount on a deal not VT?)

I mean maybe Sam offered VT a deal that was very good for the club and what more could he have done to get VT to settle for the good of the club, that should be the question.

TG And Whitley not reached Langstone Agreement to make way for next investor.

SO.......Im guessing VT would have set the max he's willing to allow TG and Whiltley to negotiate up to in order to get it settled??

So the question has to be asked.........What more could they have done to force Sam into a setttlement?

Maybe you should reverse the question !

Not sure what you mean mate?

Are you saying tg and Whitley told VT the "reckon" they could get it settle for "X" amount and failed?? (as in they set the capped amount on a deal not VT?)

I mean maybe Sam offered VT a deal that was very good for the club and what more could he have done to get VT to settle for the good of the club, that should be the question.

Hammam being instructed and playing clever

TG And Whitley not reached Langstone Agreement to make way for next investor.

SO.......Im guessing VT would have set the max he's willing to allow TG and Whiltley to negotiate up to in order to get it settled??

So the question has to be asked.........What more could they have done to force Sam into a setttlement?

Maybe you should reverse the question !

Not sure what you mean mate?

Are you saying tg and Whitley told VT the "reckon" they could get it settle for "X" amount and failed?? (as in they set the capped amount on a deal not VT?)

I mean maybe Sam offered VT a deal that was very good for the club and what more could he have done to get VT to settle for the good of the club, that should be the question.

i understand that fully and i coming at it from a similar angle as you beleive it or not

My point being is VT holding other people responsible for the deal not getting settled when infact its down to him to finalize any deal, and as you just implied maybe a deal was there and VT himself didnt want it.........As the opening post suggests VT aint happy with TG and Whitley for not getting it settled!

TG And Whitley not reached Langstone Agreement to make way for next investor.

SO.......Im guessing VT would have set the max he's willing to allow TG and Whiltley to negotiate up to in order to get it settled??

So the question has to be asked.........What more could they have done to force Sam into a setttlement?

Maybe you should reverse the question !

Not sure what you mean mate?

Are you saying tg and Whitley told VT the "reckon" they could get it settle for "X" amount and failed?? (as in they set the capped amount on a deal not VT?)

I mean maybe Sam offered VT a deal that was very good for the club and what more could he have done to get VT to settle for the good of the club, that should be the question.

i understand that fully and i coming at it from a similar angle as you beleive it or not

My point being is VT holding other people responsible for the deal not getting settled when infact its down to him to finalize any deal, and as you just implied maybe a deal was there and VT himself didnt want it.........As the opening post suggests VT aint happy with TG and Whitley for not getting it settled!

It was down to VT the deal didn't happen, he has been offered a whole new deal by Sam and hopefully he will take it, by the end of tomorrow.

It was down to VT the deal didn't happen, he has been offered a whole new deal by Sam and hopefully he will take it, by the end of tomorrow.

Finger crossed mate.....for the good of the club hopefully

Any idea why the opening poster would imply VT is Furious with TG and Whitley for it not getting sorted?

Or should his comment be ignored

cmon guys be gentle on the new poster, you can tell hes fron asia/ west ham. give him a chance

cmon guys be gentle on the new poster, you can tell hes fron asia/ west ham. give him a chance

new poster, & coincendently daya has been back
state the obvious,

f'k em they've all got more than enough money, they should take a trip down to one of the homeless hostels where having £2.50 to feed yourself is a good day, and stop being greedy c**s

TG And Whitley not reached Langstone Agreement to make way for next investor.

Couldnt you put all this in one thread?

Coudnt he just feck off. why he's let back on to post under shit names after being banned no end of times is beyond me.

TG And Whitley not reached Langstone Agreement to make way for next investor.

Couldnt you put all this in one thread?

Coudnt he just feck off. why he's let back on to post under shit names after being banned no end of times is beyond me.

what annoys me is all the people saying now that a friend who once went down the city told him the bluebirds going to be removed, funny how it has all come about when we are top two, west ham/swansea fans eh