Mon Aug 27, 2012 7:11 pm
Mon Aug 27, 2012 7:24 pm
Mon Aug 27, 2012 7:35 pm
Mon Aug 27, 2012 7:41 pm
troobloo3339 wrote:think you missed the point we now have no cover..quinn and blake were more than good enough but not given much of a chance naylor played 1 game against birmingham and marked burke out of the game and was man of match ...by the way blake did not have fitness issues he played more pre season than most including 2 games in 2 days dont believe every thing you read on here ...malky come here shouting egos will be left at the door ...may i suggest malky has a look in a mirror for any left over egos![]()
![]()
![]()
Mon Aug 27, 2012 7:50 pm
Mon Aug 27, 2012 7:53 pm
troobloo3339 wrote:not sure who you looking at.... ime talking about darcy blake and he dont look over weight ....i do know his body fat index was quite high on returning from the summer break...but he certainly did not look unfit in any of the games he played in pre season ....now lets be honest with each other malky did not like or rate him ...so hes gone just like gerrard quinn and naylor ....kienen and earnie next ...my point is we should have replacements in before geting rid of malkys dislikes![]()
![]()
![]()
Mon Aug 27, 2012 7:57 pm
Mon Aug 27, 2012 7:59 pm
troobloo3339 wrote:imo ...quinn and blake both covered fullback and centre half to a good standard ...and would not of been on to high a wage![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Mon Aug 27, 2012 8:02 pm
Mon Aug 27, 2012 8:05 pm
troobloo3339 wrote:rather that than no competition for places ...whos this an other ..we havnt got yet![]()
![]()
![]()
Mon Aug 27, 2012 8:18 pm
oxford
Mon Aug 27, 2012 8:22 pm
Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:05 pm
Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:19 pm
crackajack wrote:i think MM feels he has cover in the full back positions with kiss and cowie both i feel would be decent at defending at this leval any thoughts?
Mon Aug 27, 2012 9:21 pm
crackajack wrote:i think MM feels he has cover in the full back positions with kiss and cowie both i feel would be decent at defending at this leval any thoughts?
Tue Aug 28, 2012 3:54 pm
Tue Aug 28, 2012 4:52 pm
troobloo3339 wrote:imo ..thats the problem... we have got rid of quinn...naylor...gerrard ...blake...and brought in only connelly... plus malky wants kienen out aswell ...that leaves us with declan john ....osilaja and ben nugent all from the academy as the back up .....look what happened at bristol on saturday when turner was out injured ??????....we have the numbers in midfield now... and for me we have enough strikers if used in the right way ....but we got to get defenders in who can be first choice not back up ....taylor and mcnoughton have no competition for there place and dont appear good enough to play the role malky asks of them....when they push forward and lose the ball or (as usual)miss pass it we get caught on the break with them out of position... i fear that we cant cope defencively if we get injuries or suspensions without bringing in at least 2 new defenders ...and thats without taking blips in form into account ....we must have competition for places all over the park ...just my oppinion and observations after watching every pre season and league games this season all ready..![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Tue Aug 28, 2012 4:57 pm
Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:06 pm
troobloo3339 wrote:connelly for blake ..no effect ....er 150 k difference in cost to sign plus what ever difference in wages ....blake was one of the lowest paid of the regulars at city ...and connelly was on premiership wages at qpr ...?????????? if there just like for like playing wise ie on bench ...blake would save us a considerable amount in ££££![]()
![]()
![]()
Tue Aug 28, 2012 8:16 pm