Thu Aug 16, 2012 4:36 pm
Thu Aug 16, 2012 4:39 pm
Thu Aug 16, 2012 4:40 pm
Thu Aug 16, 2012 4:42 pm
Thu Aug 16, 2012 4:46 pm
Thu Aug 16, 2012 4:50 pm
Forever Blue wrote:Everyone said they were fed up of hearing about Sam, so I for one agreed and gave it a total rest u can't win with some of u.
Rem this Sam wants £10 mill up front and £5 mill if we are promoted, he has cut the debt well and truly down, plus offered to give up the naming rights.
Tan has said £10 mill has been put aside for Sam, so I ask why not pay him and let's get rid once and for all of the Langston main debt.
I will also repeat the truth always come out in the end.
I want City debt free like Tan has promised.![]()
Off now to Palma airport, so I am home for City v Huddersfield.
Thu Aug 16, 2012 5:00 pm
Thu Aug 16, 2012 5:03 pm
Forever Blue wrote:Everyone said they were fed up of hearing about Sam, so I for one agreed and gave it a total rest u can't win with some of u.
Rem this Sam wants £10 mill up front and £5 mill if we are promoted, he has cut the debt well and truly down, plus offered to give up the naming rights.
Tan has said £10 mill has been put aside for Sam, so I ask why not pay him and let's get rid once and for all of the Langston main debt.
I will also repeat the truth always come out in the end.
I want City debt free like Tan has promised.![]()
Off now to Palma airport, so I am home for City v Huddersfield.
Thu Aug 16, 2012 5:03 pm
NIBluebird wrote:Forever Blue wrote:Everyone said they were fed up of hearing about Sam, so I for one agreed and gave it a total rest u can't win with some of u.
Rem this Sam wants £10 mill up front and £5 mill if we are promoted, he has cut the debt well and truly down, plus offered to give up the naming rights.
Tan has said £10 mill has been put aside for Sam, so I ask why not pay him and let's get rid once and for all of the Langston main debt.
I will also repeat the truth always come out in the end.
I want City debt free like Tan has promised.![]()
Off now to Palma airport, so I am home for City v Huddersfield.
but who is actually absorbing the millions of pounds loss if there is any that is ??
Thu Aug 16, 2012 5:04 pm
Thu Aug 16, 2012 5:07 pm
Thu Aug 16, 2012 5:14 pm
ngriffiths wrote:They give sam a good written offer 3 weeks ago,but hes not replied,i dont think sam wants to do deal myself,hes hoping we get promoted so he ll get more money out of club.
Thu Aug 16, 2012 5:17 pm
Thu Aug 16, 2012 6:06 pm
Thu Aug 16, 2012 6:28 pm
Thu Aug 16, 2012 6:40 pm
Forever Blue wrote:Everyone said they were fed up of hearing about Sam, so I for one agreed and gave it a total rest u can't win with some of u.
Rem this Sam wants £10 mill up front and £5 mill if we are promoted, he has cut the debt well and truly down, plus offered to give up the naming rights.
Tan has said £10 mill has been put aside for Sam, so I ask why not pay him and let's get rid once and for all of the Langston main debt.
I will also repeat the truth always come out in the end.
I want City debt free like Tan has promised.![]()
Off now to Palma airport, so I am home for City v Huddersfield.
Thu Aug 16, 2012 6:48 pm
Thu Aug 16, 2012 7:06 pm
DandoCCFC wrote:The plan for the 100m investment was always going to carry the deal longer and longer with no movement..
Thu Aug 16, 2012 7:16 pm
Tony Blue Williams wrote:DandoCCFC wrote:The plan for the 100m investment was always going to carry the deal longer and longer with no movement..
I have always secertly thought that. You don't tell Sam Hammam that there is a spare £100m knocking about and then hope that he will take less?
Thu Aug 16, 2012 7:16 pm
ngriffiths wrote:By saying stop moving the goalposts says to me they are agreeing on a figure then sam is asking for more.
Thu Aug 16, 2012 7:19 pm
Thu Aug 16, 2012 7:26 pm
carlccfc wrote:ngriffiths wrote:By saying stop moving the goalposts says to me they are agreeing on a figure then sam is asking for more.
Sam is not asking for more, he asking Vincent Tan to honour the offer that was made 12 weeks ago but then the offer changed, then it changed again and then again and then yet again.
Thu Aug 16, 2012 7:27 pm
BluebirdJM wrote:Tony Blue Williams wrote:DandoCCFC wrote:The plan for the 100m investment was always going to carry the deal longer and longer with no movement..
I have always secertly thought that. You don't tell Sam Hammam that there is a spare £100m knocking about and then hope that he will take less?
im sure i read that they wanted to sort sam out before the rebranding, but couldnt come to a deal and then the infamous leak happend and now we are in this mess
Thu Aug 16, 2012 7:29 pm
ngriffiths wrote:carlccfc wrote:ngriffiths wrote:By saying stop moving the goalposts says to me they are agreeing on a figure then sam is asking for more.
Sam is not asking for more, he asking Vincent Tan to honour the offer that was made 12 weeks ago but then the offer changed, then it changed again and then again and then yet again.
I m just going by what tg said,that its sam moving the goalposts,cant see him lying in an agm to shareholders.
Thu Aug 16, 2012 7:31 pm
BluebirdJM wrote:Tony Blue Williams wrote:DandoCCFC wrote:The plan for the 100m investment was always going to carry the deal longer and longer with no movement..
I have always secertly thought that. You don't tell Sam Hammam that there is a spare £100m knocking about and then hope that he will take less?
im sure i read that they wanted to sort sam out before the rebranding, but couldnt come to a deal and then the infamous leak happend and now we are in this mess
Thu Aug 16, 2012 7:33 pm
Nuclearblue wrote:
T.G WE WILL BE PLAYING IN BLUE NEXT SEASON = ONE FAT LIAR
Thu Aug 16, 2012 7:36 pm
carlccfc wrote:ngriffiths wrote:By saying stop moving the goalposts says to me they are agreeing on a figure then sam is asking for more.
Sam is not asking for more, he asking Vincent Tan to honour the offer that was made 12 weeks ago but then the offer changed, then it changed again and then again and then yet again.
Thu Aug 16, 2012 7:39 pm
pembroke allan wrote:am i being silly but!! if vt doesnt swap debt to equity he will lose out big time as unsecured loans dont have priority if club goes into admin or worse! sam is in same boat except his is a dingy compared to the liner vt has! doesnt matter how much vt loans us its still his money hes useing and no garauntee of getting anything back unless he owns club!! which can only be done if he swaps debt to equity! presume this is correct??
Thu Aug 16, 2012 7:39 pm
ngriffiths wrote:carlccfc wrote:ngriffiths wrote:By saying stop moving the goalposts says to me they are agreeing on a figure then sam is asking for more.
Sam is not asking for more, he asking Vincent Tan to honour the offer that was made 12 weeks ago but then the offer changed, then it changed again and then again and then yet again.
I m just going by what tg said,that its sam moving the goalposts,cant see him lying in an agm to shareholders.
Thu Aug 16, 2012 7:40 pm
Tony Blue Williams wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:
T.G WE WILL BE PLAYING IN BLUE NEXT SEASON = ONE FAT LIAR
Don't forget that there would be no further investment either, no Bellamy, no Kim Bo, no signings at all.
Yep hell of a porkie pier old TG.