Fri Aug 10, 2012 11:03 pm
Fri Aug 10, 2012 11:05 pm
Angry Man wrote:Personally I don't care if we get promotion or not I just want this issue finally got rid of. Is that too hard a question to answer for some..?
Fri Aug 10, 2012 11:10 pm
Fri Aug 10, 2012 11:17 pm
Fri Aug 10, 2012 11:20 pm
cityone wrote:When VT is ready!!!
Fri Aug 10, 2012 11:22 pm
Angry Man wrote:cityone wrote:When VT is ready!!!
but I thought VT was an invester not the owner..?
Fri Aug 10, 2012 11:24 pm
2blue2handle wrote:Angry Man wrote:cityone wrote:When VT is ready!!!
but I thought VT was an invester not the owner..?
He is the only one that has the financial power to pay it though despite it happening way in advance of his arrival.
I feel Sam has been a little to stubborn in this and should have took the reduced offer.
I think it will go down to 2016.
Fri Aug 10, 2012 11:27 pm
Angry Man wrote:cityone wrote:When VT is ready!!!
http://www.cardiffcityforum.co.uk/
but I thought VT was an invester not the owner..?
Fri Aug 10, 2012 11:28 pm
cityone wrote:Angry Man wrote:cityone wrote:When VT is ready!!!
http://www.cardiffcityforum.co.uk/
but I thought VT was an invester not the owner..?
He his the major shareholder.
Fri Aug 10, 2012 11:31 pm
Angry Man wrote:2blue2handle wrote:Angry Man wrote:cityone wrote:When VT is ready!!!
but I thought VT was an invester not the owner..?
He is the only one that has the financial power to pay it though despite it happening way in advance of his arrival.
I feel Sam has been a little to stubborn in this and should have took the reduced offer.
I think it will go down to 2016.
so he's not an invester then..? he can only be one or the other surely
Fri Aug 10, 2012 11:33 pm
2blue2handle wrote:Angry Man wrote:2blue2handle wrote:Angry Man wrote:cityone wrote:When VT is ready!!!
but I thought VT was an invester not the owner..?
He is the only one that has the financial power to pay it though despite it happening way in advance of his arrival.
I feel Sam has been a little to stubborn in this and should have took the reduced offer.
I think it will go down to 2016.
so he's not an invester then..? he can only be one or the other surely
I didn't say he was anything.
He is the majority shareholder...... Obviously an investor hence the 40m currently invested
Fri Aug 10, 2012 11:34 pm
Angry Man wrote:cityone wrote:Angry Man wrote:cityone wrote:When VT is ready!!!
http://www.cardiffcityforum.co.uk/
but I thought VT was an invester not the owner..?
He his the major shareholder.
so the owner then and not an investor
Fri Aug 10, 2012 11:36 pm
cityone wrote:Angry Man wrote:cityone wrote:Angry Man wrote:cityone wrote:When VT is ready!!!
http://www.cardiffcityforum.co.uk/
but I thought VT was an invester not the owner..?
He his the major shareholder.
so the owner then and not an investor
He his not the owner until he increases his shares in the club to a level where it triggers a buy out of the club, (i think it,s about 47% but not sure) in the meantime he his the main invester in the club, if you want to put it that way.
Fri Aug 10, 2012 11:40 pm
Angry Man wrote:cityone wrote:Angry Man wrote:cityone wrote:Angry Man wrote:cityone wrote:When VT is ready!!!
http://www.cardiffcityforum.co.uk/
but I thought VT was an invester not the owner..?
He his the major shareholder.
so the owner then and not an investor
He his not the owner until he increases his shares in the club to a level where it triggers a buy out of the club, (i think it,s about 47% but not sure) in the meantime he his the main invester in the club, if you want to put it that way.
so why cant we say thanks for the investment but we are staying blue thank you very much
Fri Aug 10, 2012 11:49 pm
2blue2handle wrote:Angry Man wrote:2blue2handle wrote:Angry Man wrote:cityone wrote:When VT is ready!!!
but I thought VT was an invester not the owner..?
He is the only one that has the financial power to pay it though despite it happening way in advance of his arrival.
I feel Sam has been a little to stubborn in this and should have took the reduced offer.
I think it will go down to 2016.
so he's not an invester then..? he can only be one or the other surely
I didn't say he was anything.
He is the majority shareholder...... Obviously an investor hence the 40m currently invested
Sat Aug 11, 2012 6:07 am
Angry Man wrote:Personally I don't care if we get promotion or not I just want this issue finally got rid of. Is that too hard a question to answer for some..?
Sat Aug 11, 2012 7:22 am
Angry Man wrote:cityone wrote:Angry Man wrote:cityone wrote:Angry Man wrote:cityone wrote:When VT is ready!!!
http://www.cardiffcityforum.co.uk/
but I thought VT was an invester not the owner..?
He his the major shareholder.
so the owner then and not an investor
He his not the owner until he increases his shares in the club to a level where it triggers a buy out of the club, (i think it,s about 47% but not sure) in the meantime he his the main invester in the club, if you want to put it that way.
so why cant we say thanks for the investment but we are staying blue thank you very much
Sat Aug 11, 2012 7:25 am
Angry Man wrote:cityone wrote:Angry Man wrote:cityone wrote:Angry Man wrote:cityone wrote:When VT is ready!!!
http://www.cardiffcityforum.co.uk/
but I thought VT was an invester not the owner..?
He his the major shareholder.
so the owner then and not an investor
He his not the owner until he increases his shares in the club to a level where it triggers a buy out of the club, (i think it,s about 47% but not sure) in the meantime he his the main invester in the club, if you want to put it that way.
so why cant we say thanks for the investment but we are staying blue thank you very much
Sat Aug 11, 2012 7:36 am
Angry Man wrote:2blue2handle wrote:Angry Man wrote:2blue2handle wrote:Angry Man wrote:cityone wrote:When VT is ready!!!
but I thought VT was an invester not the owner..?
He is the only one that has the financial power to pay it though despite it happening way in advance of his arrival.
I feel Sam has been a little to stubborn in this and should have took the reduced offer.
I think it will go down to 2016.
so he's not an invester then..? he can only be one or the other surely
I didn't say he was anything.
He is the majority shareholder...... Obviously an investor hence the 40m currently invested
so no-one actually knows then is what you are really saying
Sat Aug 11, 2012 7:42 am
Sat Aug 11, 2012 8:10 am
bluebird1977 wrote:Well dave unless he sorts sam soon then there will not just be a few hundred kcb i know that for sure, because it wasnt about a few million in players for most fans or a dancing chinese dragon at last nights event it was more about getting that word debt free which as promised still needs to be delivered, so all you constant sam needs to swallow his pride crap you always spout makes no diffrence when clearly ITS ONE MAN WHO SAID HE WILL PAY HIM TO GET OWNERSHIP OF OUR CLUB
Sat Aug 11, 2012 8:32 am
Sat Aug 11, 2012 8:51 am
taffyapple wrote:bluebird1977 wrote:Well dave unless he sorts sam soon then there will not just be a few hundred kcb i know that for sure, because it wasnt about a few million in players for most fans or a dancing chinese dragon at last nights event it was more about getting that word debt free which as promised still needs to be delivered, so all you constant sam needs to swallow his pride crap you always spout makes no diffrence when clearly ITS ONE MAN WHO SAID HE WILL PAY HIM TO GET OWNERSHIP OF OUR CLUB
Swallow his pride CRAP?
the feller has already said he'd accept the TEN that was offered. If he'd done that then
he would be history now. But he cant let go. He's like Oliver Twist asking for more!..Greed or pride?
My point is. The D to E will take months anyway. Sam is not the only factor in all this, he
just happens to be the high-profile one that is putting himself in the Echo every few days.
Tan never said Langstone was the only thing to be cleared up first. Its the Sam camp that
are making it such a big issue. Sam WILL get paid, but I doubt he'll get away with slipping
a little sweetener in for himself this time, like he did with his last 'goodbye'
The Club are in no rush. As much as I CANT wait to see that 90mil loan disappear off the
balance sheets. No way should we be held to ransom.
Sat Aug 11, 2012 11:26 am
Angry Man wrote:Personally I don't care if we get promotion or not I just want this issue finally got rid of. Is that too hard a question to answer for some..?
Sun Aug 12, 2012 6:47 am
bluebird1977 wrote:taffyapple wrote:bluebird1977 wrote:Well dave unless he sorts sam soon then there will not just be a few hundred kcb i know that for sure, because it wasnt about a few million in players for most fans or a dancing chinese dragon at last nights event it was more about getting that word debt free which as promised still needs to be delivered, so all you constant sam needs to swallow his pride crap you always spout makes no diffrence when clearly ITS ONE MAN WHO SAID HE WILL PAY HIM TO GET OWNERSHIP OF OUR CLUB
Swallow his pride CRAP?
the feller has already said he'd accept the TEN that was offered. If he'd done that then
he would be history now. But he cant let go. He's like Oliver Twist asking for more!..Greed or pride?
My point is. The D to E will take months anyway. Sam is not the only factor in all this, he
just happens to be the high-profile one that is putting himself in the Echo every few days.
Tan never said Langstone was the only thing to be cleared up first. Its the Sam camp that
are making it such a big issue. Sam WILL get paid, but I doubt he'll get away with slipping
a little sweetener in for himself this time, like he did with his last 'goodbye'
The Club are in no rush. As much as I CANT wait to see that 90mil loan disappear off the
balance sheets. No way should we be held to ransom.
Ten was never offered though dave it was said 8 in full or 7 in full the other 3 over several seasons this was said by whiteley in the season tickets refund meeting. We even got people saying on here saying let him wait till 2016 i mean how silly does that sound can you image the 250-300million we would owe VT in loans then plus sam would want the full 38mill or whatever it is by then, some people on this board are crackers.
Sun Aug 12, 2012 7:05 am
Angry Man wrote:Personally I don't care if we get promotion or not I just want this issue finally got rid of. Is that too hard a question to answer for some..?
Sun Aug 12, 2012 7:17 am
Bluebina wrote:Angry Man wrote:Personally I don't care if we get promotion or not I just want this issue finally got rid of. Is that too hard a question to answer for some..?
Feck him, make him sweat it will be no good to him when he is ninety so he may accept less while he is not to old to enjoy any of it....
Sun Aug 12, 2012 7:52 am
bluebird1977 wrote:Bluebina wrote:Angry Man wrote:Personally I don't care if we get promotion or not I just want this issue finally got rid of. Is that too hard a question to answer for some..?
Feck him, make him sweat it will be no good to him when he is ninety so he may accept less while he is not to old to enjoy any of it....
You might not be saying f**k him come 12months time if we are in the prem and he comes back for 30+million in court, some bitter cunts about i bet you wasnt even here when we was going up the leagues mark on this money or did fans think we jumped the leagues on pennys which was never to be payed back in some shape
Sun Aug 12, 2012 8:27 am
bluebird1977 wrote:Bluebina wrote:Angry Man wrote:Personally I don't care if we get promotion or not I just want this issue finally got rid of. Is that too hard a question to answer for some..?
Feck him, make him sweat it will be no good to him when he is ninety so he may accept less while he is not to old to enjoy any of it....
You might not be saying f**k him come 12months time if we are in the prem and he comes back for 30+million in court, some bitter cunts about i bet you wasnt even here when we was going up the leagues mark on this money or did fans think we jumped the leagues on pennys which was never to be payed back in some shape
Sun Aug 12, 2012 8:41 am
bluebird1977 wrote:Bluebina wrote:Angry Man wrote:Personally I don't care if we get promotion or not I just want this issue finally got rid of. Is that too hard a question to answer for some..?
Feck him, make him sweat it will be no good to him when he is ninety so he may accept less while he is not to old to enjoy any of it....
You might not be saying f**k him come 12months time if we are in the prem and he comes back for 30+million in court, some bitter cunts about i bet you wasnt even here when we was going up the leagues mark on this money or did fans think we jumped the leagues on pennys which was never to be payed back in some shape