Bellamy contract

I was told a few weeks back this is whats done, 1million pound bonus if we go up and 35k a week

I was told a few weeks back this is whats done, 1million pound bonus if we go up and 35k a week

............and I heard we gotta pay the same as he was on at liverpool-65k pw

Wouldn't be surprised if its £35k off clubs wage bill pw and the rest is paid directly from Tan himself.

Wouldn't be surprised if its £35k off clubs wage bill pw and the rest is paid directly from Tan himself.

Surely not the same Tan as the one thats got a hidden agenda to ruin our club.

Wouldn't be surprised if its £35k off clubs wage bill pw and the rest is paid directly from Tan himself.

Surely not the same Tan as the one thats got a hidden agenda to ruin our club.

As part of my master plan to ruin a historical football club......
I'm going to put £50m of my own money into the club.....

Watch it burn......

Wouldn't be surprised if its £35k off clubs wage bill pw and the rest is paid directly from Tan himself.

So whats the diffrence we will still have to pay for it in a loan or whatever

Wouldn't be surprised if its £35k off clubs wage bill pw and the rest is paid directly from Tan himself.

So whats the diffrence we will still have to pay for it in a loan or whatever

not if he does stick to his word and convert debt to equity.

Wouldn't be surprised if its £35k off clubs wage bill pw and the rest is paid directly from Tan himself.

So whats the diffrence we will still have to pay for it in a loan or whatever

not if he does stick to his word and convert debt to equity.

I will believe that when i see it in the form of HIMSELF or TG saying its all done, besides the more they put in the deeper they go so it has to happen at some point i guess

IF that happens with the debt to equity, i might actually wee myself.

Until then my judgement is reserved.

Hes signed then

Wouldn't be surprised if its £35k off clubs wage bill pw and the rest is paid directly from Tan himself.

Surely not the same Tan as the one thats got a hidden agenda to ruin our club.

I was told a few weeks back this is whats done, 1million pound bonus if we go up and 35k a week

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/ ... in-1226933

I was told a few weeks back this is whats done, 1million pound bonus if we go up and 35k a week

http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/ ... in-1226933

Lets be honest, 35K isn't to bad when you think we have offloaded Miller who was on 20K.

And £1M bonus for going up? That will be peanuts to VT if we do reach the premier league, so once again no issue there.

At the end of the day, VT has turned us red in order for him to feel comfortable to spend some money, he's doing just that by signing Bellamy, Kim etc etc.

Without them, we won't go up, with them we have a lot better chance. Nothing is certain, but surely you want the best squad you can possibly put together? We WONT get a better player than Bellamy here, not even if we went up, players of that quality usually don't want to come to little teams like us.

Im not bothered in the slightest about the money, its up to VT who promised investment.

If VT came out tomorrow and said "We couldnt sign Craig due to his wage demands of 35K per week" there would be uproar on here after he has turned us red!

Lets be honest, 35K isn't to bad when you think we have offloaded Miller who was on 20K.

And £1M bonus for going up? That will be peanuts to VT if we do reach the premier league, so once again no issue there.

At the end of the day, VT has turned us red in order for him to feel comfortable to spend some money, he's doing just that by signing Bellamy, Kim etc etc.

Without them, we won't go up, with them we have a lot better chance. Nothing is certain, but surely you want the best squad you can possibly put together? We WONT get a better player than Bellamy here, not even if we went up, players of that quality usually don't want to come to little teams like us.

Im not bothered in the slightest about the money, its up to VT who promised investment.

If VT came out tomorrow and said "We couldnt sign Craig due to his wage demands of 35K per week" there would be uproar on here after he has turned us red!

It will be good to have him back but seems like alot fo money which could have went on three younger good players in my eyes afterall hes not going to play three times a week when the fixtures start getting clogged up, but hes a match winner from a nothing situation and we ddint have that last year bar whitts in a few games out of the blue goals when the game was shit