Tan never said he'd pay the debt FACT

What if VT has found something which means he don't have to pay Sam a thing? 1 little loophole in a case like this is all it can take to have a court side in your favour.

What if the £10m set aside for the debt was not to pay it but for court costs and forensic accountants because he knows deep down he can win this battle in court. No one has thought of it this way yet.

Just because Tan had put 3 offer types on the table doesn't mean he was going to pay Sam. That could have been just sticking the bait in the ocean to see if the fish would bite. If Sam did bite surely Tan could use this against him in court i.e. 'Why would this man accept less if he knew legally he was entitled to a larger some? Surely something does not add up if he is willing to do this'.

Maybe the offers were made by Tan to get rid of Sam now but if needs be he'll happily go to court knowing he'll win.

He said he would invest £10m to RESOLVE the historic Langston debt. That may not mean pay it. Don't forget, if the club win in court we don't have to pay the debt or interest making us debt free. This could be the reason Tan is investing so much in analysis of the whole case so he can take Sam to court once he has found something, its plausible. That would mean the debt was wiped and only other debts to other creditors would have to be paid.

whats changed ???????? too many people are listening to rumours also vt never gave a time scale did he its only been two months ffs these are multi million pound deals i think people should wait and see

This redbluebird guy makes no sence he starts threads with headlines like this defending tan, then only yesterday he had a TAN LIED thread up slagginh im off you couldnt make this up, even his signature does not match up with some of the stuff he says roathmagic alert or somebody has split personality with memory loss

This redbluebird guy makes no sence he starts threads with headlines like this defending tan, then only yesterday he had a TAN LIED thread up slagginh im off you couldnt make this up, even his signature does not match up with some of the stuff he says roathmagic alert or somebody has split personality with memory loss

Trips himself up all the time

This redbluebird guy makes no sence he starts threads with headlines like this defending tan, then only yesterday he had a TAN LIED thread up slagginh im off you couldnt make this up, even his signature does not match up with some of the stuff he says roathmagic alert or somebody has split personality with memory loss

was thinking about it overnight and came to this as a possibility

This redbluebird guy makes no sence he starts threads with headlines like this defending tan, then only yesterday he had a TAN LIED thread up slagginh im off you couldnt make this up, even his signature does not match up with some of the stuff he says roathmagic alert or somebody has split personality with memory loss

Trips himself up all the time

Cheers Crystal Palace 76.

So are you going back into the stadium again now?

What if VT has found something which means he don't have to pay Sam a thing? 1 little loophole in a case like this is all it can take to have a court side in your favour.

What if the £10m set aside for the debt was not to pay it but for court costs and forensic accountants because he knows deep down he can win this battle in court. No one has thought of it this way yet.

Just because Tan had put 3 offer types on the table doesn't mean he was going to pay Sam. That could have been just sticking the bait in the ocean to see if the fish would bite. If Sam did bite surely Tan could use this against him in court i.e. 'Why would this man accept less if he knew legally he was entitled to a larger some? Surely something does not add up if he is willing to do this'.

Maybe the offers were made by Tan to get rid of Sam now but if needs be he'll happily go to court knowing he'll win.

He said he would invest £10m to RESOLVE the historic Langston debt. That may not mean pay it. Don't forget, if the club win in court we don't have to pay the debt or interest making us debt free. This could be the reason Tan is investing so much in analysis of the whole case so he can take Sam to court once he has found something, its plausible. That would mean the debt was wiped and only other debts to other creditors would have to be paid.

Makes no sense anyway, because If sam accepts £10m - or if £10m costs are for courts solicitors, and fees - then the Club (VT) are still forking out £10m ?

Just be easier to pay SH off in that case wouldn't it?

What if VT has found something which means he don't have to pay Sam a thing? 1 little loophole in a case like this is all it can take to have a court side in your favour.

What if the £10m set aside for the debt was not to pay it but for court costs and forensic accountants because he knows deep down he can win this battle in court. No one has thought of it this way yet.

Just because Tan had put 3 offer types on the table doesn't mean he was going to pay Sam. That could have been just sticking the bait in the ocean to see if the fish would bite. If Sam did bite surely Tan could use this against him in court i.e. 'Why would this man accept less if he knew legally he was entitled to a larger some? Surely something does not add up if he is willing to do this'.

Maybe the offers were made by Tan to get rid of Sam now but if needs be he'll happily go to court knowing he'll win.

He said he would invest £10m to RESOLVE the historic Langston debt. That may not mean pay it. Don't forget, if the club win in court we don't have to pay the debt or interest making us debt free. This could be the reason Tan is investing so much in analysis of the whole case so he can take Sam to court once he has found something, its plausible. That would mean the debt was wiped and only other debts to other creditors would have to be paid.

Makes no sense anyway, because If sam accepts £10m - or if £10m costs are for courts solicitors, and fees - then the Club (VT) are still forking out £10m ?

Just be easier to pay SH off in that case wouldn't it?

It would be a victory in the courts for Tan and Cardiff City and he wouldn't have to pay the £5m promotion bonus.

oh, ok so what about the stadium naming rights that Langston own, worth £9m ?

This redbluebird guy makes no sence he starts threads with headlines like this defending tan, then only yesterday he had a TAN LIED thread up slagginh im off you couldnt make this up, even his signature does not match up with some of the stuff he says roathmagic alert or somebody has split personality with memory loss

was thinking about it overnight and came to this as a possibility

Oh rite so you went from calling him a lair and all sorts of names in your TANS A LIAR thread to now in this thread your getting the red carpet out all within eight hours sleep shit happens and people sit back and think diffrently but i got a feeling your roathmagic and worming your way in slowly with posts comming from both sides of the fence FOR NOW

This redbluebird guy makes no sence he starts threads with headlines like this defending tan, then only yesterday he had a TAN LIED thread up slagginh im off you couldnt make this up, even his signature does not match up with some of the stuff he says roathmagic alert or somebody has split personality with memory loss

was thinking about it overnight and came to this as a possibility

Oh rite so you went from calling him a lair and all sorts of names in your TANS A LIAR thread to now in this thread your getting the red carpet out all within eight hours sleep shit happens and people sit back and think diffrently but i got a feeling your roathmagic and worming your way in slowly with posts comming from both sides of the fence FOR NOW

He sounds more and more like a 12 year old rather than Roath Tragic. Who changes there mind so quickly?

What if VT has found something which means he don't have to pay Sam a thing? 1 little loophole in a case like this is all it can take to have a court side in your favour.

What if the £10m set aside for the debt was not to pay it but for court costs and forensic accountants because he knows deep down he can win this battle in court. No one has thought of it this way yet.

Just because Tan had put 3 offer types on the table doesn't mean he was going to pay Sam. That could have been just sticking the bait in the ocean to see if the fish would bite. If Sam did bite surely Tan could use this against him in court i.e. 'Why would this man accept less if he knew legally he was entitled to a larger some? Surely something does not add up if he is willing to do this'.

Maybe the offers were made by Tan to get rid of Sam now but if needs be he'll happily go to court knowing he'll win.

He said he would invest £10m to RESOLVE the historic Langston debt. That may not mean pay it. Don't forget, if the club win in court we don't have to pay the debt or interest making us debt free. This could be the reason Tan is investing so much in analysis of the whole case so he can take Sam to court once he has found something, its plausible. That would mean the debt was wiped and only other debts to other creditors would have to be paid.

For this theory to work you must at least have some idea of what the loophole is?

The Courts would actually think more of Langston, not less, for accepting a lower amount as they would be deemed as 'reasonable' in pre-court negotiations.

As it stands the club have fully accepted liability for the Langston Loan Notes and only the date of payment is in dispute.

I admire your creativity RedBlueBird but this theory is a real no-goer.

What if VT has found something which means he don't have to pay Sam a thing? 1 little loophole in a case like this is all it can take to have a court side in your favour.

What if the £10m set aside for the debt was not to pay it but for court costs and forensic accountants because he knows deep down he can win this battle in court. No one has thought of it this way yet.

Just because Tan had put 3 offer types on the table doesn't mean he was going to pay Sam. That could have been just sticking the bait in the ocean to see if the fish would bite. If Sam did bite surely Tan could use this against him in court i.e. 'Why would this man accept less if he knew legally he was entitled to a larger some? Surely something does not add up if he is willing to do this'.

Maybe the offers were made by Tan to get rid of Sam now but if needs be he'll happily go to court knowing he'll win.

He said he would invest £10m to RESOLVE the historic Langston debt. That may not mean pay it. Don't forget, if the club win in court we don't have to pay the debt or interest making us debt free. This could be the reason Tan is investing so much in analysis of the whole case so he can take Sam to court once he has found something, its plausible. That would mean the debt was wiped and only other debts to other creditors would have to be paid.

For this theory to work you must at least have some idea of what the loophole is?

The Courts would actually think more of Langston, not less, for accepting a lower amount as they would be deemed as 'reasonable' in pre-court negotiations.

As it stands the club have fully accepted liability for the Langston Loan Notes and only the date of payment is in dispute.

I admire your creativity RedBlueBird but this theory is a real no-goer.

Okay cheers pal. It was only a theory as you stated. Nice to get a mature response instead of the usual roathmagic nonsense etc.

I appreciate that greatly and what you said makes a lot of sense. I was unaware of that so learnt something new.

Thank you!!