So did this investment ever get transferred..?

We all know that its been stated that it will only happen if an agreement was ever reached with Sam. However if no money transfer ha ever taken place then but two questions if I may:

* If we were so on our knees then did they have the money to buy the players they've already purchased..?

and

* Why did the colour and badge change happen before any monies were showing in the account.?

I would hope they wouldn't transfer any money until the very moment it's about to be used.

I would hope they wouldn't transfer any money until the very moment it's about to be used.

but surely how else could we get the players already purchased if it hasn't already been transferred over..?

I would hope they wouldn't transfer any money until the very moment it's about to be used.

but surely how else could we get the players already purchased if it hasn't already been transferred over..?

im guessing here, but im thinking that the current transfers are payments in installments...

I would hope they wouldn't transfer any money until the very moment it's about to be used.

but surely how else could we get the players already purchased if it hasn't already been transferred over..?

I would guess they have paid for the initial payments via a loan for the amounts needed.

I would hope they wouldn't transfer any money until the very moment it's about to be used.

but surely how else could we get the players already purchased if it hasn't already been transferred over..?

im guessing here, but im thinking that the current transfers are payments in installments...

is that the real reason why we have looked to foreign players then because the credit rating of the club and past history with the likes of the Paul Quinn transfer would make british clubs think twice in dealing with us..?

I would hope they wouldn't transfer any money until the very moment it's about to be used.

but surely how else could we get the players already purchased if it hasn't already been transferred over..?

I would guess they have paid for the initial payments via a loan for the amounts needed.

a loan from who through..? I'm sorry but since no deal has been done with Sam it has thrown up more questions which need to be asked. Something isn't right here

I would hope they wouldn't transfer any money until the very moment it's about to be used.

but surely how else could we get the players already purchased if it hasn't already been transferred over..?

I would guess they have paid for the initial payments via a loan for the amounts needed.

a loan from who through..? I'm sorry but since no deal has been done with Sam it has thrown up more questions which need to be asked. Something isn't right here

Tan.

Not really sure what your getting at?

Shareholders AGM on Aug 16th ..... so until then I guess no answers will officially be given ?

I would hope they wouldn't transfer any money until the very moment it's about to be used.

but surely how else could we get the players already purchased if it hasn't already been transferred over..?

I would guess they have paid for the initial payments via a loan for the amounts needed.

a loan from who through..? I'm sorry but since no deal has been done with Sam it has thrown up more questions which need to be asked. Something isn't right here

Tan.

Not really sure what your getting at?

What I am getting at is why did we sign players if the club is on its arse and no money has been transferred or 'if' the money has already been transferred over then why are we so worried about SH and VT not reaching an agreement..?

It has been stated that the investment realies on the club reaching an agreement with Sam so why did we sign players before that happened..? or if the money has already been transferred over then why did VT lie that the deal was soely on a deal with Sam..?

It was never my understanding it was dependant on Langston tbh.

The rebranding went ahead to explore extra revenue streams.
As part of the package they set aside 10m for Lanston but I don't remember ever reading that the Langston deal had to be done before the rest of the investment or rebranding went ahead.

Im not sure about that one coz Im sure I read on here it was Langston accepting an offer and NEVER anything to do with rebranding that would stop the investment ?

Shareholders AGM on Aug 16th ..... so until then I guess no answers will officially be given ?

I doubt any answers will come of that either

I knew I read it somewhere: viewtopic.php?f=2&t=82057&p=776402&hilit=langstone+deal#p776402