Wed Aug 01, 2012 12:26 am
Wed Aug 01, 2012 12:38 am
RIVERSIDE-FC wrote:I'm not in the know or anytink !!!
But I really do believ that tan is playing games . And will not pay Sam off !! He could of paid him off by now why is he waiting ???
He may be gambling on the fact of city going up ...
But what If that back fires ... Will he keep pumping money into a club loosing money , building up more debt and having a long line of people the club owe money to ??
I got a feeling if we don go up in the next few years we may become rangers !!!
Wed Aug 01, 2012 12:42 am
Wed Aug 01, 2012 12:58 am
Wed Aug 01, 2012 1:34 am
RIVERSIDE-FC wrote:I would rather be our club play in a . Pink shirt with jedwed as our mascot and a dildo as our badge .. than be playing non league working our way up again or even worse in welsh league !!
Wed Aug 01, 2012 7:15 am
Wed Aug 01, 2012 8:14 am
RIVERSIDE-FC wrote:jedwed as our mascot and a dildo as our badge
Wed Aug 01, 2012 8:36 am
Wed Aug 01, 2012 9:05 am
Wed Aug 01, 2012 9:11 am
Wed Aug 01, 2012 9:20 am
neeball wrote:Why should he pay Sam?? Not Tan's debt it's the clubs debt. I don't really care how much debt the club has just would like a few seasons in the prem while I am still young enough to enjoy it and a have good day out every other saturday (don't go away much these days)
Wed Aug 01, 2012 9:23 am
RIVERSIDE-FC wrote:I'm not in the know or anytink !!!
But I really do believ that tan is playing games . And will not pay Sam off !! He could of paid him off by now why is he waiting ???
He may be gambling on the fact of city going up ...
But what If that back fires ... Will he keep pumping money into a club loosing money , building up more debt and having a long line of people the club owe money to ??
I got a feeling if we don go up in the next few years we may become rangers !!!
Wed Aug 01, 2012 9:24 am
carlccfc wrote:neeball wrote:Why should he pay Sam?? Not Tan's debt it's the clubs debt. I don't really care how much debt the club has just would like a few seasons in the prem while I am still young enough to enjoy it and a have good day out every other saturday (don't go away much these days)
Why should VT pay Langston?
Simply because if VT has no plans to pay Langston like you say then VT would be a liar, we have been promised a debt free club and Langston will be paid off, VT knew the debts of the club when he became involved and he certainly knows what he got to do to carry out his promises of 'his vision'.
The reason thousands of us accept the rebranding is for a debt free club not a few seasons in the PL.
Wed Aug 01, 2012 9:26 am
carlccfc wrote:neeball wrote:Why should he pay Sam?? Not Tan's debt it's the clubs debt. I don't really care how much debt the club has just would like a few seasons in the prem while I am still young enough to enjoy it and a have good day out every other saturday (don't go away much these days)
Why should VT pay Langston?
Simply because if VT has no plans to pay Langston like you say then VT would be a liar, we have been promised a debt free club and Langston will be paid off, VT knew the debts of the club when he became involved and he certainly knows what he got to do to carry out his promises of 'his vision'.
The reason thousands of us accept the rebranding is for a debt free club not a few seasons in the PL.
Wed Aug 01, 2012 9:27 am
Wed Aug 01, 2012 9:28 am
CraigCCFC wrote:carlccfc wrote:neeball wrote:Why should he pay Sam?? Not Tan's debt it's the clubs debt. I don't really care how much debt the club has just would like a few seasons in the prem while I am still young enough to enjoy it and a have good day out every other saturday (don't go away much these days)
Why should VT pay Langston?
Simply because if VT has no plans to pay Langston like you say then VT would be a liar, we have been promised a debt free club and Langston will be paid off, VT knew the debts of the club when he became involved and he certainly knows what he got to do to carry out his promises of 'his vision'.
The reason thousands of us accept the rebranding is for a debt free club not a few seasons in the PL.
Don't you think he needs time though?
None of us can even begin to understand what financial experts at that level are doing, we can guess all we want but the truth is, if we knew we wouldnt be doing the jobs we are probably all in now!
Wed Aug 01, 2012 10:07 am
Wed Aug 01, 2012 10:23 am
Tony Blue Williams wrote:RIVERSIDE-FC wrote:I'm not in the know or anytink !!!
But I really do believ that tan is playing games . And will not pay Sam off !! He could of paid him off by now why is he waiting ???
He may be gambling on the fact of city going up ...
But what If that back fires ... Will he keep pumping money into a club loosing money , building up more debt and having a long line of people the club owe money to ??
I got a feeling if we don go up in the next few years we may become rangers !!!
I'm starting to believe this whole episode won't be settled until we know our fate next May. If we go up Sam/Langston will be paid £10m + £5m without much fuss.
If we fail to get promoted again then I suspect Tan will put us into Administration and blame Langston for failing to take the earlier offers.
By then VT will be owed something like £75m. When Ranson, PMG and the rest take their bit of the secured property there won't be much left over to cover VT's loans and therefore he will become easily the biggest unsecured creditor.
He can then make an offer to buy CCFC out of Admin for as little as a few million (& get it accepted as the biggest creditor) and then he starts again with a 'debt free' Cardiff City.
Wed Aug 01, 2012 6:05 pm
Tony Blue Williams wrote:RIVERSIDE-FC wrote:I'm not in the know or anytink !!!
But I really do believ that tan is playing games . And will not pay Sam off !! He could of paid him off by now why is he waiting ???
He may be gambling on the fact of city going up ...
But what If that back fires ... Will he keep pumping money into a club loosing money , building up more debt and having a long line of people the club owe money to ??
I got a feeling if we don go up in the next few years we may become rangers !!!
I'm starting to believe this whole episode won't be settled until we know our fate next May. If we go up Sam/Langston will be paid £10m + £5m without much fuss.
If we fail to get promoted again then I suspect Tan will put us into Administration and blame Langston for failing to take the earlier offers.
By then VT will be owed something like £75m. When Ranson, PMG and the rest take their bit of the secured property there won't be much left over to cover VT's loans and therefore he will become easily the biggest unsecured creditor.
He can then make an offer to buy CCFC out of Admin for as little as a few million (& get it accepted as the biggest creditor) and then he starts again with a 'debt free' Cardiff City.
Wed Aug 01, 2012 8:00 pm
Forever Blue wrote:CraigCCFC wrote:carlccfc wrote:neeball wrote:Why should he pay Sam?? Not Tan's debt it's the clubs debt. I don't really care how much debt the club has just would like a few seasons in the prem while I am still young enough to enjoy it and a have good day out every other saturday (don't go away much these days)
Why should VT pay Langston?
Simply because if VT has no plans to pay Langston like you say then VT would be a liar, we have been promised a debt free club and Langston will be paid off, VT knew the debts of the club when he became involved and he certainly knows what he got to do to carry out his promises of 'his vision'.
The reason thousands of us accept the rebranding is for a debt free club not a few seasons in the PL.
Don't you think he needs time though?
None of us can even begin to understand what financial experts at that level are doing, we can guess all we want but the truth is, if we knew we wouldnt be doing the jobs we are probably all in now!
Craig, It's been well over 2 yrs since Tan agreed to settle it, when he signed and agreed that he accepted this debt was owing.
Wed Aug 01, 2012 8:06 pm