Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:23 am
Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:26 am
Bluebird64 wrote:Are we left with owing VT a debt of gratitude or are we left with just a bigger debt ?
Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:30 am
Angry Man wrote:Bluebird64 wrote:Are we left with owing VT a debt of gratitude or are we left with just a bigger debt ?
A bigger debt of course as Ive been telling people ever since information of so-called 'rebrand' become public!!!!Yet people preferred to believe others who would wear pink in their support of VT!!!!
Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:35 am
RFMH wrote:Angry Man wrote:Bluebird64 wrote:Are we left with owing VT a debt of gratitude or are we left with just a bigger debt ?
A bigger debt of course as Ive been telling people ever since information of so-called 'rebrand' become public!!!!Yet people preferred to believe others who would wear pink in their support of VT!!!!
You did say VT was giving no money at all to the club though so your hardly credible on the issue.
If in 12 months time we've had a terrible campaign, still no equity swap, still no Langston deal etc. Then I think you'll see a very different view and approach from nearly all supporters.
Totally agree, so let's wait and see Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:40 am
RFMH wrote:Angry Man wrote:Bluebird64 wrote:Are we left with owing VT a debt of gratitude or are we left with just a bigger debt ?
A bigger debt of course as Ive been telling people ever since information of so-called 'rebrand' become public!!!!Yet people preferred to believe others who would wear pink in their support of VT!!!!
You did say VT was giving no money at all to the club though so your hardly credible on the issue.
If in 12 months time we've had a terrible campaign, still no equity swap, still no Langston deal etc. Then I think you'll see a very different view and approach from nearly all supporters.
Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:42 am
Bluebird64 wrote:RFMH wrote:Angry Man wrote:Bluebird64 wrote:Are we left with owing VT a debt of gratitude or are we left with just a bigger debt ?
A bigger debt of course as Ive been telling people ever since information of so-called 'rebrand' become public!!!!Yet people preferred to believe others who would wear pink in their support of VT!!!!
You did say VT was giving no money at all to the club though so your hardly credible on the issue.
If in 12 months time we've had a terrible campaign, still no equity swap, still no Langston deal etc. Then I think you'll see a very different view and approach from nearly all supporters.
12 months time? You must be kiddingl, that would take to the start of the 2013 -2014 season.I am sure that even the most pro red would have lost patience well before that.
Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:50 am
RFMH wrote:Bluebird64 wrote:RFMH wrote:Angry Man wrote:Bluebird64 wrote:Are we left with owing VT a debt of gratitude or are we left with just a bigger debt ?
A bigger debt of course as Ive been telling people ever since information of so-called 'rebrand' become public!!!!Yet people preferred to believe others who would wear pink in their support of VT!!!!
You did say VT was giving no money at all to the club though so your hardly credible on the issue.
If in 12 months time we've had a terrible campaign, still no equity swap, still no Langston deal etc. Then I think you'll see a very different view and approach from nearly all supporters.
12 months time? You must be kiddingl, that would take to the start of the 2013 -2014 season.I am sure that even the most pro red would have lost patience well before that.
I didn't mean 365 days to this precise day. Sorry if you had to infer that. Replace 12 months time with "By the end of next season" if you can't grasp that yourself.
Tue Jul 31, 2012 10:42 am
Bluebird64 wrote:RFMH wrote:Bluebird64 wrote:RFMH wrote:Angry Man wrote:Bluebird64 wrote:Are we left with owing VT a debt of gratitude or are we left with just a bigger debt ?
A bigger debt of course as Ive been telling people ever since information of so-called 'rebrand' become public!!!!Yet people preferred to believe others who would wear pink in their support of VT!!!!
You did say VT was giving no money at all to the club though so your hardly credible on the issue.
If in 12 months time we've had a terrible campaign, still no equity swap, still no Langston deal etc. Then I think you'll see a very different view and approach from nearly all supporters.
12 months time? You must be kiddingl, that would take to the start of the 2013 -2014 season.I am sure that even the most pro red would have lost patience well before that.
I didn't mean 365 days to this precise day. Sorry if you had to infer that. Replace 12 months time with "By the end of next season" if you can't grasp that yourself.
So that will be in 10 months time then which is just as bad.I think even the staunch reds would not be prepared to wait that long.
Tue Jul 31, 2012 11:16 am
Angry Man wrote:Bluebird64 wrote:Are we left with owing VT a debt of gratitude or are we left with just a bigger debt ?
A bigger debt of course as Ive been telling people ever since information of so-called 'rebrand' become public!!!!Yet people preferred to believe others who would wear pink in their support of VT!!!!
Tue Jul 31, 2012 11:27 am
Tue Jul 31, 2012 11:35 am
Sneggyblubird wrote:Well guys I guess the longer it goes on the more credible the blue position will be but I still maintain telling Tan how and when is a bit like telling your father how to f**k.
Tue Jul 31, 2012 11:39 am
RFMH wrote:Angry Man wrote:Bluebird64 wrote:Are we left with owing VT a debt of gratitude or are we left with just a bigger debt ?
A bigger debt of course as Ive been telling people ever since information of so-called 'rebrand' become public!!!!Yet people preferred to believe others who would wear pink in their support of VT!!!!
You did say VT was giving no money at all to the club though so your hardly credible on the issue.
If in 12 months time we've had a terrible campaign, still no equity swap, still no Langston deal etc. Then I think you'll see a very different view and approach from nearly all supporters.
Tue Jul 31, 2012 1:00 pm
RFMH wrote:
If in 12 months time we've had a terrible campaign, still no equity swap, still no Langston deal etc. Then I think you'll see a very different view and approach from nearly all supporters.
Tue Jul 31, 2012 1:07 pm
ffs wrote:RFMH wrote:
If in 12 months time we've had a terrible campaign, still no equity swap, still no Langston deal etc. Then I think you'll see a very different view and approach from nearly all supporters.
It will be too late by that time