Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

VT

Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:23 am

Are we left with owing VT a debt of gratitude or are we left with just a bigger debt ? :ayatollah:

Re: VT

Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:26 am

Bluebird64 wrote:Are we left with owing VT a debt of gratitude or are we left with just a bigger debt ? :ayatollah:


A bigger debt of course as Ive been telling people ever since information of so-called 'rebrand' become public!!!! :evil: Yet people preferred to believe others who would wear pink in their support of VT!!!! :evil:

Re: VT

Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:30 am

Angry Man wrote:
Bluebird64 wrote:Are we left with owing VT a debt of gratitude or are we left with just a bigger debt ? :ayatollah:


A bigger debt of course as Ive been telling people ever since information of so-called 'rebrand' become public!!!! :evil: Yet people preferred to believe others who would wear pink in their support of VT!!!! :evil:


You did say VT was giving no money at all to the club though so your hardly credible on the issue.

If in 12 months time we've had a terrible campaign, still no equity swap, still no Langston deal etc. Then I think you'll see a very different view and approach from nearly all supporters.

Re: VT

Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:35 am

RFMH wrote:
Angry Man wrote:
Bluebird64 wrote:Are we left with owing VT a debt of gratitude or are we left with just a bigger debt ? :ayatollah:


A bigger debt of course as Ive been telling people ever since information of so-called 'rebrand' become public!!!! :evil: Yet people preferred to believe others who would wear pink in their support of VT!!!! :evil:


You did say VT was giving no money at all to the club though so your hardly credible on the issue.

If in 12 months time we've had a terrible campaign, still no equity swap, still no Langston deal etc. Then I think you'll see a very different view and approach from nearly all supporters.

:ayatollah: Totally agree, so let's wait and see ;)

Re: VT

Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:40 am

RFMH wrote:
Angry Man wrote:
Bluebird64 wrote:Are we left with owing VT a debt of gratitude or are we left with just a bigger debt ? :ayatollah:


A bigger debt of course as Ive been telling people ever since information of so-called 'rebrand' become public!!!! :evil: Yet people preferred to believe others who would wear pink in their support of VT!!!! :evil:


You did say VT was giving no money at all to the club though so your hardly credible on the issue.

If in 12 months time we've had a terrible campaign, still no equity swap, still no Langston deal etc. Then I think you'll see a very different view and approach from nearly all supporters.


12 months time? You must be kiddingl, that would take to the start of the 2013 -2014 season.I am sure that even the most pro red would have lost patience well before that.

Re: VT

Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:42 am

Bluebird64 wrote:
RFMH wrote:
Angry Man wrote:
Bluebird64 wrote:Are we left with owing VT a debt of gratitude or are we left with just a bigger debt ? :ayatollah:


A bigger debt of course as Ive been telling people ever since information of so-called 'rebrand' become public!!!! :evil: Yet people preferred to believe others who would wear pink in their support of VT!!!! :evil:


You did say VT was giving no money at all to the club though so your hardly credible on the issue.

If in 12 months time we've had a terrible campaign, still no equity swap, still no Langston deal etc. Then I think you'll see a very different view and approach from nearly all supporters.


12 months time? You must be kiddingl, that would take to the start of the 2013 -2014 season.I am sure that even the most pro red would have lost patience well before that.


I didn't mean 365 days to this precise day. Sorry if you had to infer that. Replace 12 months time with "By the end of next season" if you can't grasp that yourself.

Re: VT

Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:50 am

RFMH wrote:
Bluebird64 wrote:
RFMH wrote:
Angry Man wrote:
Bluebird64 wrote:Are we left with owing VT a debt of gratitude or are we left with just a bigger debt ? :ayatollah:


A bigger debt of course as Ive been telling people ever since information of so-called 'rebrand' become public!!!! :evil: Yet people preferred to believe others who would wear pink in their support of VT!!!! :evil:


You did say VT was giving no money at all to the club though so your hardly credible on the issue.

If in 12 months time we've had a terrible campaign, still no equity swap, still no Langston deal etc. Then I think you'll see a very different view and approach from nearly all supporters.


12 months time? You must be kiddingl, that would take to the start of the 2013 -2014 season.I am sure that even the most pro red would have lost patience well before that.


I didn't mean 365 days to this precise day. Sorry if you had to infer that. Replace 12 months time with "By the end of next season" if you can't grasp that yourself.

So that will be in 10 months time then which is just as bad. :lol: I think even the staunch reds would not be prepared to wait that long.

Re: VT

Tue Jul 31, 2012 10:42 am

Bluebird64 wrote:
RFMH wrote:
Bluebird64 wrote:
RFMH wrote:
Angry Man wrote:
Bluebird64 wrote:Are we left with owing VT a debt of gratitude or are we left with just a bigger debt ? :ayatollah:


A bigger debt of course as Ive been telling people ever since information of so-called 'rebrand' become public!!!! :evil: Yet people preferred to believe others who would wear pink in their support of VT!!!! :evil:


You did say VT was giving no money at all to the club though so your hardly credible on the issue.

If in 12 months time we've had a terrible campaign, still no equity swap, still no Langston deal etc. Then I think you'll see a very different view and approach from nearly all supporters.


12 months time? You must be kiddingl, that would take to the start of the 2013 -2014 season.I am sure that even the most pro red would have lost patience well before that.


I didn't mean 365 days to this precise day. Sorry if you had to infer that. Replace 12 months time with "By the end of next season" if you can't grasp that yourself.

So that will be in 10 months time then which is just as bad. :lol: I think even the staunch reds would not be prepared to wait that long.

:lol: If it did drag on till then it would mean we are either promoted, relegated or another season in the championship, but STILL in business ;)

Re: VT

Tue Jul 31, 2012 11:16 am

Angry Man wrote:
Bluebird64 wrote:Are we left with owing VT a debt of gratitude or are we left with just a bigger debt ? :ayatollah:


A bigger debt of course as Ive been telling people ever since information of so-called 'rebrand' become public!!!! :evil: Yet people preferred to believe others who would wear pink in their support of VT!!!! :evil:


Adam, I have to totally agree with u and I have always maintained this as well.

Re: VT

Tue Jul 31, 2012 11:27 am

Well guys I guess the longer it goes on the more credible the blue position will be but I still maintain telling Tan how and when is a bit like telling your father how to f**k. :ayatollah:

Re: VT

Tue Jul 31, 2012 11:35 am

Sneggyblubird wrote:Well guys I guess the longer it goes on the more credible the blue position will be but I still maintain telling Tan how and when is a bit like telling your father how to f**k. :ayatollah:

In Tans case at present its more like f**k up. :ayatollah:

Re: VT

Tue Jul 31, 2012 11:39 am

RFMH wrote:
Angry Man wrote:
Bluebird64 wrote:Are we left with owing VT a debt of gratitude or are we left with just a bigger debt ? :ayatollah:


A bigger debt of course as Ive been telling people ever since information of so-called 'rebrand' become public!!!! :evil: Yet people preferred to believe others who would wear pink in their support of VT!!!! :evil:


You did say VT was giving no money at all to the club though so your hardly credible on the issue.

If in 12 months time we've had a terrible campaign, still no equity swap, still no Langston deal etc. Then I think you'll see a very different view and approach from nearly all supporters.


^This. No one knows whats going to happen in this next year, IMO VT is doing good for the club.

Re: VT

Tue Jul 31, 2012 1:00 pm

RFMH wrote:
If in 12 months time we've had a terrible campaign, still no equity swap, still no Langston deal etc. Then I think you'll see a very different view and approach from nearly all supporters.


It will be too late by that time

Re: VT

Tue Jul 31, 2012 1:07 pm

ffs wrote:
RFMH wrote:
If in 12 months time we've had a terrible campaign, still no equity swap, still no Langston deal etc. Then I think you'll see a very different view and approach from nearly all supporters.


It will be too late by that time


But at least give him a chance tho right?

Ridsdale didn't get this much stick when he robbed us all.