Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:12 am
Tue Jul 03, 2012 7:18 am
Tue Jul 03, 2012 8:41 am
Tue Jul 03, 2012 8:56 am
Tue Jul 03, 2012 9:01 am
Tue Jul 03, 2012 10:28 am
Bluebird64 wrote:I have read many posts recently in relation to fans thinking VT can do no wrong. The Berjaya Group recently lost its bid for a betting license from the Malaysian government and its shares plummeted by almost a quarter as a result. See link. http://www.forbes.com/profile/vincent-tan/
March 2012
Self-made entrepreneur runs conglomerate Berjaya Group, but fortune sank by almost a quarter over the past year as shares stumbled. Owns social networking website Friendster.com and bought shares of Facebook through his Internet company, MOL.com. Failed to get a sports betting license from the government. Hates golf but loves scuba diving and working out at the gym.
Tue Jul 03, 2012 10:35 am
Bluebird64 wrote:I have read many posts recently in relation to fans thinking VT can do no wrong. The Berjaya Group recently lost its bid for a betting license from the Malaysian government and its shares plummeted by almost a quarter as a result. See link. http://www.forbes.com/profile/vincent-tan/
March 2012
Self-made entrepreneur runs conglomerate Berjaya Group, but fortune sank by almost a quarter over the past year as shares stumbled. Owns social networking website Friendster.com and bought shares of Facebook through his Internet company, MOL.com. Failed to get a sports betting license from the government. Hates golf but loves scuba diving and working out at the gym.
Tue Jul 03, 2012 11:17 am
jinks-rct wrote:Bluebird64 wrote:I have read many posts recently in relation to fans thinking VT can do no wrong. The Berjaya Group recently lost its bid for a betting license from the Malaysian government and its shares plummeted by almost a quarter as a result. See link. http://www.forbes.com/profile/vincent-tan/
March 2012
Self-made entrepreneur runs conglomerate Berjaya Group, but fortune sank by almost a quarter over the past year as shares stumbled. Owns social networking website Friendster.com and bought shares of Facebook through his Internet company, MOL.com. Failed to get a sports betting license from the government. Hates golf but loves scuba diving and working out at the gym.
No hes an aweful businessman who luckily must have won millions on a scrathcard win![]()
Tue Jul 03, 2012 11:22 am
Tony Blue Williams wrote:Bluebird64 wrote:I have read many posts recently in relation to fans thinking VT can do no wrong. The Berjaya Group recently lost its bid for a betting license from the Malaysian government and its shares plummeted by almost a quarter as a result. See link. http://www.forbes.com/profile/vincent-tan/
March 2012
Self-made entrepreneur runs conglomerate Berjaya Group, but fortune sank by almost a quarter over the past year as shares stumbled. Owns social networking website Friendster.com and bought shares of Facebook through his Internet company, MOL.com. Failed to get a sports betting license from the government. Hates golf but loves scuba diving and working out at the gym.
He was set to get a betting licence days after our play-off loss to Blackpool.
However, do to protests by the Muslim majority in Malaysia his betting licence was revoked. He is due to get it back next year providing the ruling UMNO party are reelected in the May 2013 General Election.
Tue Jul 03, 2012 11:23 am
Merlin wrote:People questioning a business man who is in the top 8 of forbes richest men in Malaysia.....
I too don't see why this has made sticky section?
Tue Jul 03, 2012 11:25 am
Tue Jul 03, 2012 11:29 am
CP76 wrote:Merlin wrote:People questioning a business man who is in the top 8 of forbes richest men in Malaysia.....
I too don't see why this has made sticky section?![]()
![]()
I will question his football decisions all day long as he hasnt got a clue in that respect but questioning a billionaires business credentials?
Tue Jul 03, 2012 11:46 am
Tue Jul 03, 2012 11:50 am
Natman Blue wrote:Merlin wrote:People questioning a business man who is in the top 8 of forbes richest men in Malaysia.....
I too don't see why this has made sticky section?
I didn't see why it was a sticky either but bizarrely my comment has been removed, for what reason I don't know!!!
Tue Jul 03, 2012 11:59 am
Tony Blue Williams wrote:Bluebird64 wrote:I have read many posts recently in relation to fans thinking VT can do no wrong. The Berjaya Group recently lost its bid for a betting license from the Malaysian government and its shares plummeted by almost a quarter as a result. See link. http://www.forbes.com/profile/vincent-tan/
March 2012
Self-made entrepreneur runs conglomerate Berjaya Group, but fortune sank by almost a quarter over the past year as shares stumbled. Owns social networking website Friendster.com and bought shares of Facebook through his Internet company, MOL.com. Failed to get a sports betting license from the government. Hates golf but loves scuba diving and working out at the gym.
He was set to get a betting licence days after our play-off loss to Blackpool.
However, do to protests by the Muslim majority in Malaysia his betting licence was revoked. He is due to get it back next year providing the ruling UMNO party are reelected in the May 2013 General Election.
Tue Jul 03, 2012 12:20 pm
CP76 wrote:Natman Blue wrote:Merlin wrote:People questioning a business man who is in the top 8 of forbes richest men in Malaysia.....
I too don't see why this has made sticky section?
I didn't see why it was a sticky either but bizarrely my comment has been removed, for what reason I don't know!!!
Because you were probably sniping at Annis again you bible bashing bully.
Tue Jul 03, 2012 12:21 pm
CP76 wrote:Natman Blue wrote:Merlin wrote:People questioning a business man who is in the top 8 of forbes richest men in Malaysia.....
I too don't see why this has made sticky section?
I didn't see why it was a sticky either but bizarrely my comment has been removed, for what reason I don't know!!!
Because you were probably sniping at Annis again you bible bashing bully.
Tue Jul 03, 2012 12:24 pm
Natman Blue wrote:CP76 wrote:Natman Blue wrote:Merlin wrote:People questioning a business man who is in the top 8 of forbes richest men in Malaysia.....
I too don't see why this has made sticky section?
I didn't see why it was a sticky either but bizarrely my comment has been removed, for what reason I don't know!!!
Because you were probably sniping at Annis again you bible bashing bully.
and what is sniping???? from what I understand it would be doing it from behind someone's back, if I have a different view I put it straight out in the open and am direct. I've messaged Annis privately about that and I doubt he would be bullied by many if any
Tue Jul 03, 2012 12:31 pm
CP76 wrote:Natman Blue wrote:CP76 wrote:Natman Blue wrote:Merlin wrote:People questioning a business man who is in the top 8 of forbes richest men in Malaysia.....
I too don't see why this has made sticky section?
I didn't see why it was a sticky either but bizarrely my comment has been removed, for what reason I don't know!!!
Because you were probably sniping at Annis again you bible bashing bully.
and what is sniping???? from what I understand it would be doing it from behind someone's back, if I have a different view I put it straight out in the open and am direct. I've messaged Annis privately about that and I doubt he would be bullied by many if any
Youve devoted your live on this messageboard to chip, chip, chipping away at him for god sake.
Funnily enough I find Annis is open and direct yet because his viewpoint isnt one you share you are chipping away at him??
Double standards dont you think? Lord?
Tue Jul 03, 2012 2:53 pm
Natman Blue wrote:CP76 wrote:Natman Blue wrote:CP76 wrote:Natman Blue wrote:Merlin wrote:People questioning a business man who is in the top 8 of forbes richest men in Malaysia.....
I too don't see why this has made sticky section?
I didn't see why it was a sticky either but bizarrely my comment has been removed, for what reason I don't know!!!
Because you were probably sniping at Annis again you bible bashing bully.
and what is sniping???? from what I understand it would be doing it from behind someone's back, if I have a different view I put it straight out in the open and am direct. I've messaged Annis privately about that and I doubt he would be bullied by many if any
Youve devoted your live on this messageboard to chip, chip, chipping away at him for god sake.
Funnily enough I find Annis is open and direct yet because his viewpoint isnt one you share you are chipping away at him??
Double standards dont you think? Lord?
Look, I got it wrong, I got frustrated at all the anti VT & TG and Pro-blue (or whatever you want to call it) propoganda that was constantly being pumped. I wanted the other side of the argument to be given as much of an audience as the one above was (which is where my faith came in; equality and standing up for things and the 'other' side etc.) now perhaps where I went a bit astray is the way in which I did it which I can hold my hands up too and try and tackle differently next time. I saw it more as fighting for an alternative view rather than bullying.
Me and Annis have had long telephone discussions about things in the past and have talked about some of the things we've discussed previously on here. I've not devoted my life to chip chip chipping away and have made plenty of other contributions, some along the similar lines as Annis and others not. I just like to consider all alternatives rather than having one view constantly push push pushed. When we've talked we've both seen where each other has been coming from and both can appreciate the other's view point, perhaps a message board isn't always the best medium by which to have these discussion either?!?!
Tue Jul 03, 2012 4:14 pm
Tue Jul 03, 2012 8:37 pm
Tue Jul 03, 2012 8:47 pm
Natman Blue wrote:CP76 wrote:The way I see it, its Annis board he can promote, stick and delete what he likes.
Its not an official board of the club so why should he promote red in the interest of fairness? Especially when he cannot stand the idea.
Does Natman promote Pro Aethiest / Anti christ articles on his Christianity blog in the Interest of fairness?
I dont think so.[/quote
A blog is for expressing a person's view or thoughts on a subject. So if Annis has a blog then fair play. However on my board, then yes I would welcome those kinds of posts, the way I see it is there should be balanced debate so how can I edit, block or delete other people's posts just because they don't agree with mine???
Tue Jul 03, 2012 8:51 pm
CP76 wrote:Natman Blue wrote:CP76 wrote:The way I see it, its Annis board he can promote, stick and delete what he likes.
Its not an official board of the club so why should he promote red in the interest of fairness? Especially when he cannot stand the idea.
Does Natman promote Pro Aethiest / Anti christ articles on his Christianity blog in the Interest of fairness?
I dont think so.[/quote
A blog is for expressing a person's view or thoughts on a subject. So if Annis has a blog then fair play. However on my board, then yes I would welcome those kinds of posts, the way I see it is there should be balanced debate so how can I edit, block or delete other people's posts just because they don't agree with mine???
There are plenty of pro red posts on here. You are getting your frillies in a twist because they are not made "stickys".
Get over it ffs.