Keiths comment in the Echo today

He is 'spot on' about his worries over the so-called investment. When people like Keith are sound worried then its time to listen

He is 'spot on' about his worries over the so-called investment. When people like Keith are sound worried then its time to listen

I,ve read it and I was there, and now as then we were told it would be invested as equity and the club would be debt free. It was clear then and it's clear now.

It is a part of the fair play scenario and for us to have the playing budget needed, it would not be of benefit to have a big debt showing on the books, if he is the owner, there is no debt. it's his to own.

He is 'spot on' about his worries over the so-called investment. When people like Keith are sound worried then its time to listen

I,ve read it and I was there, and now as then we were told it would be invested as equity and the club would be debt free. It was clear then and it's clear now.

It is a part of the fair play scenario and for us to have the playing budget needed, it would not be of benefit to have a big debt showing on the books, if he is the owner, there is no debt. it's his to own.

You may well have been told but its a worry that nothing was mentioned about it in the official statement

Would surely help if you posted his comments. Whose Keith?

Link Please, Keith Morgan.

He is 'spot on' about his worries over the so-called investment. When people like Keith are sound worried then its time to listen

I,ve read it and I was there, and now as then we were told it would be invested as equity and the club would be debt free. It was clear then and it's clear now.

It is a part of the fair play scenario and for us to have the playing budget needed, it would not be of benefit to have a big debt showing on the books, if he is the owner, there is no debt. it's his to own.

You may well have been told but its a worry that nothing was mentioned about it in the official statement

It was a statement to tell the fans of the plans, not an in detail end of year account or detailed business plan, that will be disclosed in the share holders meeting, he didn't have to tell us anything in all fairness, it's his business, his money and whether we like it or not, his club.

Strange how the story isn't on Walesonline yet its a two page spread in todays echo.

The headline is 'Questions raised over Tan's scheme'.

Curiosity has really kicked in now.

Strange how the story isn't on Walesonline yet its a two page spread in todays echo.

The headline is 'Questions raised over Tan's scheme'.

ANOTHER CONSPIRACY, HEY.

Strange how the story isn't on Walesonline yet its a two page spread in todays echo.

The headline is 'Questions raised over Tan's scheme'.

ANOTHER CONSPIRACY, HEY.

No just another example of unprofessionalisum on the part of Media Wales.

I'm not writing it all out but he did say 'The thing I was a bit disappointed with was it didn't make clear that as soon as the Langston money is paid off it won't convert money into shares. It would be nice to get clarification they are not paying off Langson and replacing it with another loan.

Keith also estimated that there would probably be £5 million for City manager Malky Mackay to spend in the summer tranfer market.

I wonder if Carl could get Media Wales to put the whole of the report onto the website asap

Didnt realise Keith was doing Citys books now

Even if they did replace one debt with another I'd rather it be Tans money than a company we know nothing about, no address for or know who runs it.

Didnt realise Keith was doing Citys books now

Even if they did replace one debt with another I'd rather it be Tans money than a company we know nothing about, no address for or know who runs it.

So you would prefer to have a debt which would grow up to £7 million per year interest rather than a debt with no interest rate..?

Didnt realise Keith was doing Citys books now

Even if they did replace one debt with another I'd rather it be Tans money than a company we know nothing about, no address for or know who runs it.

Didnt realise Keith was doing Citys books now

Even if they did replace one debt with another I'd rather it be Tans money than a company we know nothing about, no address for or know who runs it.

So you would prefer to have a debt which would grow up to £7 million per year interest rather than a debt with no interest rate..?

Langston have an interest rate of 7%

Didnt realise Keith was doing Citys books now

Even if they did replace one debt with another I'd rather it be Tans money than a company we know nothing about, no address for or know who runs it.

So you would prefer to have a debt which would grow up to £7 million per year interest rather than a debt with no interest rate..?

Langston have an interest rate of 7%

Sorry I meant it was a straight cut price deal with no interest rate which is what the £10 million was.

The club have bought the media adam thats why it wasnt on there everything must be run through them now before its release

The club have bought the media adam thats why it wasnt on there everything must be run through them now before its release

It is a very interesting article and one for everyone to read. Stunned that its not on their website tbh

The club have bought the media adam thats why it wasnt on there everything must be run through them now before its release

Ha Ha. Is that why it's called the SUN (Tan)

The club have bought the media adam thats why it wasnt on there everything must be run through them now before its release

It is a very interesting article and one for everyone to read. Stunned that its not on their website tbh

This is not a joke the club have bought the rights to see whats being said before its released, why its not on there as more would see it.

Didnt realise Keith was doing Citys books now

Even if they did replace one debt with another I'd rather it be Tans money than a company we know nothing about, no address for or know who runs it.

So you would prefer to have a debt which would grow up to £7 million per year interest rather than a debt with no interest rate..?

Langston have an interest rate of 7%

Sorry I meant it was a straight cut price deal with no interest rate which is what the £10 million was.

Yes but for it to be a 'straight cut price deal with no interest rate' you would need Tan's money to stop Langstons 7% interest rate charge? Your point doesn't really make sense if I am totally honest.

Didnt realise Keith was doing Citys books now

Even if they did replace one debt with another I'd rather it be Tans money than a company we know nothing about, no address for or know who runs it.

So you would prefer to have a debt which would grow up to £7 million per year interest rather than a debt with no interest rate..?

Langston have an interest rate of 7%

Sorry I meant it was a straight cut price deal with no interest rate which is what the £10 million was.

Yes but for it to be a 'straight cut price deal with no interest rate' you would need Tan's money to stop Langstons 7% interest rate charge? Your point doesn't really make sense if I am totally honest.

If Sam was willing to accept £10 million then sell players to finally get rid of the debt once and for all. Surely fans would accept that it would be better long term if players were sold to finance it.

[


If Sam was willing to accept £10 million then sell players to finally get rid of the debt once and for all. Surely fans would accept that it would be better long term if players were sold to finance it.

But Ray Ranson gets the first £3.5m of any player sales and apart from Whittingham and Turner who else could command a decent fee?

[


If Sam was willing to accept £10 million then sell players to finally get rid of the debt once and for all. Surely fans would accept that it would be better long term if players were sold to finance it.

But Ray Ranson gets the first £3.5m of any player sales and apart from Whittingham and Turner who else could command a decent fee?

is it any player sales or a percentage of sales over a certain amount..?

[


If Sam was willing to accept £10 million then sell players to finally get rid of the debt once and for all. Surely fans would accept that it would be better long term if players were sold to finance it.

But Ray Ranson gets the first £3.5m of any player sales and apart from Whittingham and Turner who else could command a decent fee?

is it any player sales or a percentage of sales over a certain amount..?

The 1st 2.8million he gets as the agreement was re-wrote.

[


If Sam was willing to accept £10 million then sell players to finally get rid of the debt once and for all. Surely fans would accept that it would be better long term if players were sold to finance it.

But Ray Ranson gets the first £3.5m of any player sales and apart from Whittingham and Turner who else could command a decent fee?

is it any player sales or a percentage of sales over a certain amount..?

The 1st 2.8million he gets as the agreement was re-wrote.

What a pathetic agreement for the club FFS!!!

[


If Sam was willing to accept £10 million then sell players to finally get rid of the debt once and for all. Surely fans would accept that it would be better long term if players were sold to finance it.

But Ray Ranson gets the first £3.5m of any player sales and apart from Whittingham and Turner who else could command a decent fee?

is it any player sales or a percentage of sales over a certain amount..?

The 1st 2.8million he gets as the agreement was re-wrote.

What a pathetic agreement for the club FFS!!!

Better than having to pay it back as it was well overdue.

The 50% straight interest that Ridsdale agreed with them in the 1st place was the bad deal !

Also interest charged by the malaysians is in line with the interest charged by sam and PMG, why would they charge less. none of it has actually been paid anyway (unlike PMG) . If they are true to their word it will be part of the debt-equity conversion anyway.

[


If Sam was willing to accept £10 million then sell players to finally get rid of the debt once and for all. Surely fans would accept that it would be better long term if players were sold to finance it.

But Ray Ranson gets the first £3.5m of any player sales and apart from Whittingham and Turner who else could command a decent fee?

is it any player sales or a percentage of sales over a certain amount..?

The 1st 2.8million he gets as the agreement was re-wrote.

What a pathetic agreement for the club FFS!!!

Better than having to pay it back as it was well overdue.

The 50% straight interest that Ridsdale agreed with them in the 1st place was the bad deal !

Also interest charged by the malaysians is in line with the interest charged by sam and PMG, why would they charge less. none of it has actually been paid anyway (unlike PMG) . If they are true to their word it will be part of the debt-equity conversion anyway.

But that is what Keith is worried about because the debt equity conversation wasn't mentioned in the statement

The club have bought the media adam thats why it wasnt on there everything must be run through them now before its release

It is a very interesting article and one for everyone to read. Stunned that its not on their website tbh

This is not a joke the club have bought the rights to see whats being said before its released, why its not on there as more would see it.

How come the article is in the actual newspaper then? Would it not have been censored before being printed in the paper?

Or is it only the online articles that the club have "bought" and are choosing to censor?

is it any player sales or a percentage of sales over a certain amount..?[/quote]
The 1st 2.8million he gets as the agreement was re-wrote.[/quote]

What a pathetic agreement for the club FFS!!! [/quote]

Better than having to pay it back as it was well overdue.

The 50% straight interest that Ridsdale agreed with them in the 1st place was the bad deal !

Also interest charged by the malaysians is in line with the interest charged by sam and PMG, why would they charge less. none of it has actually been paid anyway (unlike PMG) . If they are true to their word it will be part of the debt-equity conversion anyway.[/quote]

But that is what Keith is worried about because the debt equity conversation wasn't mentioned in the statement[/quote]

If it isn't then the Malaysians will just be left with 49% of a debt overloaded statment.

Look at it this way, without them we are in admin. IF they don't change the debt to eqity and pull out then we are in admin.

At least there is a CHANCE we can survive/succeed with them. Until Sam is sorted and the conversion is done, then we shold all be, well maybe not worried, but cautious, but without their funding we truly would be screwed. And stuff like selling the players to clear debts is dreamland. We couldn't even cover Sams debt, especially as other clubs aren't stupid, they would offer us well under (like we did for Turner) - AND we'd go down, no doubt, THEN we will have a massive reduction in our income. What then, crowds of 12000 knocking around the CCS...

[


If Sam was willing to accept £10 million then sell players to finally get rid of the debt once and for all. Surely fans would accept that it would be better long term if players were sold to finance it.

But Ray Ranson gets the first £3.5m of any player sales and apart from Whittingham and Turner who else could command a decent fee?

is it any player sales or a percentage of sales over a certain amount..?

The 1st 2.8million he gets as the agreement was re-wrote.

What a pathetic agreement for the club FFS!!!

Better than having to pay it back as it was well overdue.

The 50% straight interest that Ridsdale agreed with them in the 1st place was the bad deal !

Also interest charged by the malaysians is in line with the interest charged by sam and PMG, why would they charge less. none of it has actually been paid anyway (unlike PMG) . If they are true to their word it will be part of the debt-equity conversion anyway.

And that's what's happening from what I have been told,