Tue Jun 05, 2012 7:01 am
Tue Jun 05, 2012 7:03 am
ngriffiths wrote:alan whiteley on radio wales says there is a board meeting today to discuss rebranding again,and how much tan is investing.
Tue Jun 05, 2012 7:12 am
Tue Jun 05, 2012 7:27 am
Tue Jun 05, 2012 7:28 am
Tue Jun 05, 2012 7:29 am
Tue Jun 05, 2012 7:29 am
Tue Jun 05, 2012 8:10 am
Tue Jun 05, 2012 8:24 am
Tue Jun 05, 2012 8:32 am
ngriffiths wrote:alan whiteley on radio wales says there is a board meeting today to discuss rebranding again,and how much tan is investing.
Tue Jun 05, 2012 8:50 am
Bluebird64 wrote:I hope that it is a discussion and that fans views will be represented at the meeting.
Tue Jun 05, 2012 9:09 am
Tue Jun 05, 2012 9:24 am
ngriffiths wrote:alan whiteley on radio wales says there is a board meeting today to discuss rebranding again,and how much tan is investing.
Tue Jun 05, 2012 9:47 am
Tue Jun 05, 2012 9:50 am
Die Walkure wrote:I think that they're well entitled to reconsider their views, as over the last few weeks it has become apparent that the opposition to the rebranding may not have been as strong as it appeared over the first few days of the leak.
Onwards and upwards.
Tue Jun 05, 2012 9:53 am
Die Walkure wrote:I think that they're well entitled to reconsider their views, as over the last few weeks it has become apparent that the opposition to the rebranding may not have been as strong as it appeared over the first few days of the leak.
Onwards and upwards.
Tue Jun 05, 2012 9:55 am
Bluebird64 wrote:Die Walkure wrote:I think that they're well entitled to reconsider their views, as over the last few weeks it has become apparent that the opposition to the rebranding may not have been as strong as it appeared over the first few days of the leak.
Onwards and upwards.
They are not entitled to reconsider at all. They put out a statement in writing telling us we would be blue. If they will not honour a written statement then its no wonder that the Langston talks have broken down.
Tue Jun 05, 2012 9:59 am
Wayne S wrote:Bluebird64 wrote:Die Walkure wrote:I think that they're well entitled to reconsider their views, as over the last few weeks it has become apparent that the opposition to the rebranding may not have been as strong as it appeared over the first few days of the leak.
Onwards and upwards.
They are not entitled to reconsider at all. They put out a statement in writing telling us we would be blue. If they will not honour a written statement then its no wonder that the Langston talks have broken down.
They put out a statement that they would not go ahead with the rebranding if the fans did not want it. Over the last few weeks numerous polls and statements have shown the uproar to be a lot less.
No one would be held to a statement that was made whilst not knowing the full facts.
Tue Jun 05, 2012 10:01 am
Tue Jun 05, 2012 10:04 am
Wayne S wrote:Bluebird64 wrote:I hope that it is a discussion and that fans views will be represented at the meeting.
I think the fans views have been well represented over the last few weeks. It's time to grow a pair and come out with their DETAILED plans once and for all.
Tue Jun 05, 2012 2:25 pm
Gonzo wrote:Exactly, the club were mislead by the fans leaders at the ill-fated meeting in my opinion. The many comments, emails, letters and messages of support will have shown TG and VT that we don't all want to go on a protest march and burn Thailand flags ()
Those who shout loudest get heard and we have some of the loudest fans in the country....
Tue Jun 05, 2012 2:26 pm
Bluebird64 wrote:Die Walkure wrote:I think that they're well entitled to reconsider their views, as over the last few weeks it has become apparent that the opposition to the rebranding may not have been as strong as it appeared over the first few days of the leak.
Onwards and upwards.
They are not entitled to reconsider at all. They put out a statement in writing telling us we would be blue. If they will not honour a written statement then its no wonder that the Langston talks have broken down.
Tue Jun 05, 2012 2:29 pm
T-G-I-ROBINFRIDAY wrote:Bluebird64 wrote:Die Walkure wrote:I think that they're well entitled to reconsider their views, as over the last few weeks it has become apparent that the opposition to the rebranding may not have been as strong as it appeared over the first few days of the leak.
Onwards and upwards.
They are not entitled to reconsider at all. They put out a statement in writing telling us we would be blue. If they will not honour a written statement then its no wonder that the Langston talks have broken down.
Get real carrying the Club to the tune of over a million a month entitles them to do as they please and i am all for whatever they decide,