Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

Lad and 1948

Sun Jun 03, 2012 3:57 pm

I'm being a little hypocritcal in this thread but if you are fed up of the nationalists and sick of the threads then why do you bring them up? Just a quastion that's all.

Re: Lad and 1948

Sun Jun 03, 2012 3:58 pm

Got to set them straight and create debate innit


and I'm hardly tired of them. Just disapproving and sceptical.

Re: Lad and 1948

Sun Jun 03, 2012 3:59 pm

rhys1927ccfc wrote:I'm being a little hypocritcal in this thread but if you are fed up of the nationalists and sick of the threads then why do you bring them up? Just a quastion that's all.


Do you see a correlation between them both?

Re: Lad and 1948

Sun Jun 03, 2012 4:00 pm

The Lad wrote:Got to set them straight and create debate innit


and I'm hardly tired of them. Just disapproving and sceptical.

i'm happy to debate anything, but surely you must be tired of us if you want to ban us? i'm quite tired of it myself because a lot of you are just spouting the same shit, but like I said i'm happy to debate most things.

Re: Lad and 1948

Sun Jun 03, 2012 4:01 pm

Bridgend_bluebird wrote:
rhys1927ccfc wrote:I'm being a little hypocritcal in this thread but if you are fed up of the nationalists and sick of the threads then why do you bring them up? Just a quastion that's all.


Do you see a correlation between them both?

What do you mean? I noticed they hated eachother not so long ago but are now friends because of all this debating :)

Re: Lad and 1948

Sun Jun 03, 2012 4:02 pm

rhys1927ccfc wrote:
The Lad wrote:Got to set them straight and create debate innit


and I'm hardly tired of them. Just disapproving and sceptical.

i'm happy to debate anything, but surely you must be tired of us if you want to ban us?.

Nah, and I don't really want them banned, just a line I spout for the MAD CRAIC BANTAH. It'd be boring if everyone believed in the same political ideas.

Re: Lad and 1948

Sun Jun 03, 2012 4:02 pm

rhys1927ccfc wrote:
Bridgend_bluebird wrote:
rhys1927ccfc wrote:I'm being a little hypocritcal in this thread but if you are fed up of the nationalists and sick of the threads then why do you bring them up? Just a quastion that's all.


Do you see a correlation between them both?

What do you mean? I noticed they hated eachother not so long ago but are now friends because of all this debating :)


Well I'm still trying to determine who 1948 is and was curious.

Re: Lad and 1948

Sun Jun 03, 2012 4:03 pm

The Lad wrote:
rhys1927ccfc wrote:
The Lad wrote:Got to set them straight and create debate innit


and I'm hardly tired of them. Just disapproving and sceptical.

i'm happy to debate anything, but surely you must be tired of us if you want to ban us?.

Nah, and I don't really want them banned, just a line I spout for the MAD CRAIC BANTAH. It'd be boring if everyone believed in the same political ideas.

Yeah I actually agree withy you there, but it is very boring now after 48 hours of the same shit on this board. :lol:

Re: Lad and 1948

Sun Jun 03, 2012 4:03 pm

rhys1927ccfc wrote:
Bridgend_bluebird wrote:
rhys1927ccfc wrote:I'm being a little hypocritcal in this thread but if you are fed up of the nationalists and sick of the threads then why do you bring them up? Just a quastion that's all.


Do you see a correlation between them both?

What do you mean? I noticed they hated eachother not so long ago but are now friends because of all this debating :)

I never hated him, and we're hardly friends, but when he suggested I was a paedophile he over-stepped the mark.

Re: Lad and 1948

Sun Jun 03, 2012 4:03 pm

The Lad wrote:
rhys1927ccfc wrote:
Bridgend_bluebird wrote:
rhys1927ccfc wrote:I'm being a little hypocritcal in this thread but if you are fed up of the nationalists and sick of the threads then why do you bring them up? Just a quastion that's all.


Do you see a correlation between them both?

What do you mean? I noticed they hated eachother not so long ago but are now friends because of all this debating :)

I never hated him, and we're hardly friends, but when he suggested I was a paedophile he over-stepped the mark.


Why did he suggest you were a paedophile?

Re: Lad and 1948

Sun Jun 03, 2012 4:05 pm

Bridgend_bluebird wrote:
rhys1927ccfc wrote:
Bridgend_bluebird wrote:
rhys1927ccfc wrote:I'm being a little hypocritcal in this thread but if you are fed up of the nationalists and sick of the threads then why do you bring them up? Just a quastion that's all.


Do you see a correlation between them both?

What do you mean? I noticed they hated eachother not so long ago but are now friends because of all this debating :)


Well I'm still trying to determine who 1948 is and was curious.

Me too. I thought it was Gwyn and still think it is. When I kept asking him for evidence for when I alledgedly said I was anti-English, I thought he was going to sign on to the Gwyn account, edit one of my posts, sign back on to 1948 and provide the fake evidence, but I thought the people on this board can't be that ridiculous. :lol: I don't know mind. :roll:

Re: Lad and 1948

Sun Jun 03, 2012 4:05 pm

Bridgend_bluebird wrote:
The Lad wrote:
rhys1927ccfc wrote:
Bridgend_bluebird wrote:
rhys1927ccfc wrote:I'm being a little hypocritcal in this thread but if you are fed up of the nationalists and sick of the threads then why do you bring them up? Just a quastion that's all.


Do you see a correlation between them both?

What do you mean? I noticed they hated eachother not so long ago but are now friends because of all this debating :)

I never hated him, and we're hardly friends, but when he suggested I was a paedophile he over-stepped the mark.


Why did he suggest you were a paedophile?

Reckons I'm someone called Baker who is one apparently.

Re: Lad and 1948

Sun Jun 03, 2012 4:06 pm

The Lad wrote:
rhys1927ccfc wrote:
Bridgend_bluebird wrote:
rhys1927ccfc wrote:I'm being a little hypocritcal in this thread but if you are fed up of the nationalists and sick of the threads then why do you bring them up? Just a quastion that's all.


Do you see a correlation between them both?

What do you mean? I noticed they hated eachother not so long ago but are now friends because of all this debating :)

I never hated him, and we're hardly friends, but when he suggested I was a paedophile he over-stepped the mark.

I never seen that post, but he can't go making those allegations. :shock:

Re: Lad and 1948

Sun Jun 03, 2012 4:07 pm

The Lad wrote:
Bridgend_bluebird wrote:
The Lad wrote:
rhys1927ccfc wrote:
Bridgend_bluebird wrote:
rhys1927ccfc wrote:I'm being a little hypocritcal in this thread but if you are fed up of the nationalists and sick of the threads then why do you bring them up? Just a quastion that's all.


Do you see a correlation between them both?

What do you mean? I noticed they hated eachother not so long ago but are now friends because of all this debating :)

I never hated him, and we're hardly friends, but when he suggested I was a paedophile he over-stepped the mark.


Why did he suggest you were a paedophile?

Reckons I'm someone called Baker who is one apparently.


I'm not sure if he's a paedo but hes a f*cking creep.

Re: Lad and 1948

Sun Jun 03, 2012 4:07 pm

1948 has been quiet for a while though, maybe he's getting his bag of piss emptied and his catheter cleaned. :old:

Re: Lad and 1948

Sun Jun 03, 2012 4:09 pm

rhys1927ccfc wrote:1948 has been quiet for a while though, maybe he's getting his bag of piss emptied and his catheter cleaned. :old:

:lol:

Re: Lad and 1948

Sun Jun 03, 2012 4:47 pm

The Lad wrote:Got to set them straight and create debate innit


and I'm hardly tired of them. Just disapproving and sceptical.


What's a nationalist......in your opinion?

Re: Lad and 1948

Mon Jun 04, 2012 1:43 pm

Bridgend_bluebird wrote:I'm not sure if he's a paedo but hes a f*cking creep.


How exactly am I a creep you tw*t? :old:

Lad I can only apologise profusely for what was said. I did over step the mark quite considerably to be honest but you have to understand I was under constant harassment at that time. Won't label as a peadophile again.

I have been a bluebird for 64 years you know :old:

Re: Lad and 1948

Mon Jun 04, 2012 1:46 pm

Bluebird since 1948 wrote:
Bridgend_bluebird wrote:I'm not sure if he's a paedo but hes a f*cking creep.


How exactly am I a creep you tw*t? :old:

Lad I can only apologise profusely for what was said. I did over step the mark quite considerably to be honest but you have to understand I was under constant harassment at that time. Won't label as a peadophile again.

I have been a bluebird for 64 years you know :old:


Are you baker?

Re: Lad and 1948

Mon Jun 04, 2012 1:46 pm

Can't say I am, are you?

:old:

Re: Lad and 1948

Mon Jun 04, 2012 1:48 pm

Bluebird since 1948 wrote:Can't say I am, are you?

:old:


Nope and I didn't call you a creep it was meant to baker.

Re: Lad and 1948

Mon Jun 04, 2012 3:11 pm

Bridgend_bluebird wrote:
Bluebird since 1948 wrote:Can't say I am, are you?

:old:


Nope and I didn't call you a creep it was meant to baker.


Good.

:old: :old: :old:

Re: Lad and 1948

Mon Jun 04, 2012 3:17 pm

You are 64 years old and have been a bluebird since you were born? rubbish, I have been a bluebird since the first match i attended i am 64 and have been a bluebird for over 55 years

Re: Lad and 1948

Mon Jun 04, 2012 3:22 pm

Igovernor wrote:You are 64 years old and have been a bluebird since you were born? rubbish, I have been a bluebird since the first match i attended i am 64 and have been a bluebird for over 55 years


Wrong. I am 70 this month, I attended my first game in 48, West Brom and we lost 5-0 I think. :old:

Re: Lad and 1948

Mon Jun 04, 2012 3:54 pm

Bluebird since 1948 wrote:
Igovernor wrote:You are 64 years old and have been a bluebird since you were born? rubbish, I have been a bluebird since the first match i attended i am 64 and have been a bluebird for over 55 years


Wrong. I am 70 this month, I attended my first game in 48, West Brom and we lost 5-0 I think. :old:


A lot of similarities to old Victor from Mikes board a few years hence, if so i'm sure a few old phrases of his will pop up, did like old Victor, but he did lose the plot in the end, perhaps the break done him good. :old:

Re: Lad and 1948

Mon Jun 04, 2012 4:21 pm

Bluebird since 1948 wrote:
Igovernor wrote:You are 64 years old and have been a bluebird since you were born? rubbish, I have been a bluebird since the first match i attended i am 64 and have been a bluebird for over 55 years


Wrong. I am 70 this month, I attended my first game in 48, West Brom and we lost 5-0 I think. :old:


Sorry about that! at least you have an excuse for all your rantings you must be senile :old: :lol:

Re: Lad and 1948

Mon Jun 04, 2012 5:00 pm

Bluebird since 1948 wrote:
Igovernor wrote:You are 64 years old and have been a bluebird since you were born? rubbish, I have been a bluebird since the first match i attended i am 64 and have been a bluebird for over 55 years


Wrong. I am 70 this month, I attended my first game in 48, West Brom and we lost 5-0 I think. :old:

How long did it take you to research that result?

Re: Lad and 1948

Mon Jun 04, 2012 5:01 pm

rhys1927ccfc wrote:
Bluebird since 1948 wrote:
Igovernor wrote:You are 64 years old and have been a bluebird since you were born? rubbish, I have been a bluebird since the first match i attended i am 64 and have been a bluebird for over 55 years


Wrong. I am 70 this month, I attended my first game in 48, West Brom and we lost 5-0 I think. :old:

How long did it take you to research that result?


Iv'e alluded to this in the past.

How long will it take you to answer questions that you can't give answer to? :old:

Re: Lad and 1948

Mon Jun 04, 2012 5:03 pm

Bluebird since 1948 wrote:
rhys1927ccfc wrote:
Bluebird since 1948 wrote:
Igovernor wrote:You are 64 years old and have been a bluebird since you were born? rubbish, I have been a bluebird since the first match i attended i am 64 and have been a bluebird for over 55 years


Wrong. I am 70 this month, I attended my first game in 48, West Brom and we lost 5-0 I think. :old:

How long did it take you to research that result?


Iv'e alluded to this in the past.

How long will it take you to answer questions that you can't give answer to? :old:

How could I give an answer to something that wasn't a question :old:

Re: Lad and 1948

Mon Jun 04, 2012 5:04 pm

rhys1927ccfc wrote:
Bluebird since 1948 wrote:
rhys1927ccfc wrote:
Bluebird since 1948 wrote:
Igovernor wrote:You are 64 years old and have been a bluebird since you were born? rubbish, I have been a bluebird since the first match i attended i am 64 and have been a bluebird for over 55 years


Wrong. I am 70 this month, I attended my first game in 48, West Brom and we lost 5-0 I think. :old:

How long did it take you to research that result?


Iv'e alluded to this in the past.

How long will it take you to answer questions that you can't give answer to? :old:

How could I give an answer to something that wasn't a question :old:

Also a little hypocritical as you didn't answer my question :old: