Thu May 31, 2012 9:35 am
Thu May 31, 2012 9:44 am
Thu May 31, 2012 10:17 am
Thu May 31, 2012 10:20 am
BigGwynram wrote:Have we given VT the excuse needed to say OK we carry on as previous, but we can't keep losing over a million pounds a month, so we have to trim our costs somewhere, especially since we have also got rid of any income the Blues were bringing us.
This talk of looking for extra investors, is that a bluff, how many people are going to pump money into a business allegedly seventy million pounds in debt and losing fifteen million pounds a year.
I think the next two months will show things that will determine our future, hopefully VT will provide the funds needed to bring in the new players needed if we intend pushing for promotion, and whilst some may say promotion isn't everything, Agreed! but for VT to protect his investment and get any return or attract new investors, I think most will agree that will only happen if the business become viable, and to do that we either need the Premiership and the money that goes with it, or we need to be a more efficient business and run with a much lower wage bill and monthly costs whilst hopefully increasing or at the very least maintaining large crowds.
Will that happen if we start sliding down the divisions, let's hope we don't need to find out.
If the Red or Blue thing was a smoke screen or bluff as some are saying, what if we had let's say called the bluff and totally gone along with things, surely VT being a "honorable man" would have had to come up with the promised investment or faced the wrath of the fans and justifiably so for breaking his word.
This is just me throwing some thoughts out there to hopefully stimulate some HEALTHY debate, I haven't got the answers, just loads of worries, time will tell, and whilst we may argue among ourselves the majority of us on here all want the same thing, well hopefully we do.
Thu May 31, 2012 11:29 am
BigGwynram wrote:Have we given VT the excuse needed to say OK we carry on as previous, but we can't keep losing over a million pounds a month, so we have to trim our costs somewhere, especially since we have also got rid of any income the Blues were bringing us.
This talk of looking for extra investors, is that a bluff, how many people are going to pump money into a business allegedly seventy million pounds in debt and losing fifteen million pounds a year.
I think the next two months will show things that will determine our future, hopefully VT will provide the funds needed to bring in the new players needed if we intend pushing for promotion, and whilst some may say promotion isn't everything, Agreed! but for VT to protect his investment and get any return or attract new investors, I think most will agree that will only happen if the business become viable, and to do that we either need the Premiership and the money that goes with it, or we need to be a more efficient business and run with a much lower wage bill and monthly costs whilst hopefully increasing or at the very least maintaining large crowds.
Will that happen if we start sliding down the divisions, let's hope we don't need to find out.
If the Red or Blue thing was a smoke screen or bluff as some are saying, what if we had let's say called the bluff and totally gone along with things, surely VT being a "honorable man" would have had to come up with the promised investment or faced the wrath of the fans and justifiably so for breaking his word.
This is just me throwing some thoughts out there to hopefully stimulate some HEALTHY debate, I haven't got the answers, just loads of worries, time will tell, and whilst we may argue among ourselves the majority of us on here all want the same thing, well hopefully we do.
Thu May 31, 2012 11:49 am
Thu May 31, 2012 11:54 am
Thu May 31, 2012 12:01 pm
bethanmattsgrampy wrote:Is it down to the lake I fear Eh eh eh ya eh![]()
![]()
Thu May 31, 2012 12:03 pm
Thu May 31, 2012 12:18 pm
Martyn1963 wrote:Simple answer is we have a season similar to the last 1 BUT City's debt will more or less be £20mil more come this time next year unless we reach the promised land !!
Thu May 31, 2012 12:33 pm
tylerdurdenisabluebird wrote:Who the hell do you think you are to question where we go from here? It is none of your business you customer.
Thu May 31, 2012 1:05 pm
bluebirdbaz wrote:tylerdurdenisabluebird wrote:Who the hell do you think you are to question where we go from here? It is none of your business you customer.
Can I sense a bit of stalking going on here ??? Adam you really need to take a chill pill it's all getting a bit weird with your love in with Gwynn
Thu May 31, 2012 1:07 pm
Thu May 31, 2012 2:49 pm
Martyn1963 wrote:Simple answer is we have a season similar to the last 1 BUT City's debt will more or less be £20mil more come this time next year unless we reach the promised land !!
Thu May 31, 2012 5:27 pm
Thu May 31, 2012 5:28 pm
Thu May 31, 2012 5:36 pm
bluebird1977 wrote:Vt was never going to invest a 100million for many reasons i really dont know where we get this 100million figure from as it was only a suggested figure in one of the meetings with fans reps by people on the board talking for the malaysians on the night of this meeting about the rebrand. For a start VT will not settle pmg/langston THERE BOTH DEAD DEALS AS IM TYPING THIS (not that it may not happen again in six months but rite now there dead) it was never about the 100million all of this.
VT couldnt give two flying pigs about what us fans think weather it be dragons/red shirts to go with the inhouse fighting which is the sad part, So all the shouting from the forums and scaremongering of him walking away was pointless by us all whatever camp we was in red or blue besides the new home red shirts was on order before it all come to light that says it all about how he cares for are opinions as fans or fans leaders as they say.
When the meeting come langston had an agreement which we was all told is ready to be signed by all involved and the same with PMG on here and in the media we was all told about this its all 99% done bar signatures. Come sitting around the table time all in the same room ready to sign to speak THE MALAYSIANS had changed the agreements again as follows, sam wanted ten million upfront he walks away we all move on and same with pmg. This was changed to three million in one payment and seven million over the next few seasons in bits to a total of ten million which is still eighteen million less than whats hes owed to start with (28 million) im sure if sam had agreed these new tinkered terms and pmg to any of these new terms the malaysians would be claiming in the media TWENTY EIGHT MILLION PAYED OFF TO LANGSTON & PMG GONE iwth us fans bowing down to them but this was never the case. Whats to say they wouldnt mess these two parties about again next year would the malaysians grind down some more on langston/pmg with payments along with new agreements being wrote up again when it suited them, so nobody can blame themeither for pulling the plug on any deal.
We got a 1.2million pound a month leak going from the club what are they doing about that?? because i wish somebody would tell me bar sit on 7% apr when they have have to bridge the gap monthly. We have a ray ranson deal (the riddler) where players worth three million who are sold ALL THE MONEY GOES TO HIM so the malaysians dont sell players because theres nothing in it for them yet we take the dont offer new contract to some players worth millions let them leave for free like burke, jay, others route.
If the malaysians are serious about TAKING US TO THE PREM AND GETTING A RETURN both pmg/langston need to go first now if there all going to argue over how things are payed when both partys want a 3rd of what there owned what hope as fans have we got of these deals getting done sometime soon whats worse is when things are agreed yet the malaysians turn around and change it on SIGN HERE day unknown to both partys like already stated. These are the same people who want prem football but wouldnt langston/pmg want more money if we was in the prem due to more money streams comming in to the club like sky money ect ect yet here we are no further than we was 12months ago with both partys that we need to get rid off for sure if we are to move on.
All we get to hear is the malaysians are paying 1.2million pound a month to keep us afloat from fans who claim there some kind of world savious but clearly there not as nothings been getting done about this 1.2million pound every month for two seasons at all nore will it change.
As for all this bidding for him or linked to this player in the press thats another whole story again but above is about PMG/LANGSTON after all nothing is ever going to happen with the 100million dream some fans have been creaming there pants over untill both are from the club so ask yourselfs this WHY ARE THEY STILL HERE if the malaysians want to move on and have 100million yet do not agree to agreements already agreed but only change the angle on the agreements when all partys are sat around a table.
If people want to reply to this with there i know nothing or wall of text bullshit then fine but what ive wrote is nothing else but 100% of what i know is going on and went on in the past (last few weeks)
Thu May 31, 2012 5:37 pm
bluebird1977 wrote:Vt was never going to invest a 100million for many reasons i really dont know where we get this 100million figure from as it was only a suggested figure in one of the meetings with fans reps by people on the board talking for the malaysians on the night of this meeting about the rebrand. For a start VT will not settle pmg/langston THERE BOTH DEAD DEALS AS IM TYPING THIS (not that it may not happen again in six months but rite now there dead) it was never about the 100million all of this.
VT couldnt give two flying pigs about what us fans think weather it be dragons/red shirts to go with the inhouse fighting which is the sad part, So all the shouting from the forums and scaremongering of him walking away was pointless by us all whatever camp we was in red or blue besides the new home red shirts was on order before it all come to light that says it all about how he cares for are opinions as fans or fans leaders as they say.
When the meeting come langston had an agreement which we was all told is ready to be signed by all involved and the same with PMG on here and in the media we was all told about this its all 99% done bar signatures. Come sitting around the table time all in the same room ready to sign to speak THE MALAYSIANS had changed the agreements again as follows, sam wanted ten million upfront he walks away we all move on and same with pmg. This was changed to three million in one payment and seven million over the next few seasons in bits to a total of ten million which is still eighteen million less than whats hes owed to start with (28 million) im sure if sam had agreed these new tinkered terms and pmg to any of these new terms the malaysians would be claiming in the media TWENTY EIGHT MILLION PAYED OFF TO LANGSTON & PMG GONE iwth us fans bowing down to them but this was never the case. Whats to say they wouldnt mess these two parties about again next year would the malaysians grind down some more on langston/pmg with payments along with new agreements being wrote up again when it suited them, so nobody can blame themeither for pulling the plug on any deal.
We got a 1.2million pound a month leak going from the club what are they doing about that?? because i wish somebody would tell me bar sit on 7% apr when they have have to bridge the gap monthly. We have a ray ranson deal (the riddler) where players worth three million who are sold ALL THE MONEY GOES TO HIM so the malaysians dont sell players because theres nothing in it for them yet we take the dont offer new contract to some players worth millions let them leave for free like burke, jay, others route.
If the malaysians are serious about TAKING US TO THE PREM AND GETTING A RETURN both pmg/langston need to go first now if there all going to argue over how things are payed when both partys want a 3rd of what there owned what hope as fans have we got of these deals getting done sometime soon whats worse is when things are agreed yet the malaysians turn around and change it on SIGN HERE day unknown to both partys like already stated. These are the same people who want prem football but wouldnt langston/pmg want more money if we was in the prem due to more money streams comming in to the club like sky money ect ect yet here we are no further than we was 12months ago with both partys that we need to get rid off for sure if we are to move on.
All we get to hear is the malaysians are paying 1.2million pound a month to keep us afloat from fans who claim there some kind of world savious but clearly there not as nothings been getting done about this 1.2million pound every month for two seasons at all nore will it change.
As for all this bidding for him or linked to this player in the press thats another whole story again but above is about PMG/LANGSTON after all nothing is ever going to happen with the 100million dream some fans have been creaming there pants over untill both are from the club so ask yourselfs this WHY ARE THEY STILL HERE if the malaysians want to move on and have 100million yet do not agree to agreements already agreed but only change the angle on the agreements when all partys are sat around a table.
If people want to reply to this with there i know nothing or wall of text bullshit then fine but what ive wrote is nothing else but 100% of what i know is going on and went on in the past (last few weeks)
Thu May 31, 2012 5:37 pm
bluebird1977 wrote:Vt was never going to invest a 100million for many reasons i really dont know where we get this 100million figure from as it was only a suggested figure in one of the meetings with fans reps by people on the board talking for the malaysians on the night of this meeting about the rebrand. For a start VT will not settle pmg/langston THERE BOTH DEAD DEALS AS IM TYPING THIS (not that it may not happen again in six months but rite now there dead) it was never about the 100million all of this.
VT couldnt give two flying pigs about what us fans think weather it be dragons/red shirts to go with the inhouse fighting which is the sad part, So all the shouting from the forums and scaremongering of him walking away was pointless by us all whatever camp we was in red or blue besides the new home red shirts was on order before it all come to light that says it all about how he cares for are opinions as fans or fans leaders as they say.
When the meeting come langston had an agreement which we was all told is ready to be signed by all involved and the same with PMG on here and in the media we was all told about this its all 99% done bar signatures. Come sitting around the table time all in the same room ready to sign to speak THE MALAYSIANS had changed the agreements again as follows, sam wanted ten million upfront he walks away we all move on and same with pmg. This was changed to three million in one payment and seven million over the next few seasons in bits to a total of ten million which is still eighteen million less than whats hes owed to start with (28 million) im sure if sam had agreed these new tinkered terms and pmg to any of these new terms the malaysians would be claiming in the media TWENTY EIGHT MILLION PAYED OFF TO LANGSTON & PMG GONE iwth us fans bowing down to them but this was never the case. Whats to say they wouldnt mess these two parties about again next year would the malaysians grind down some more on langston/pmg with payments along with new agreements being wrote up again when it suited them, so nobody can blame themeither for pulling the plug on any deal.
We got a 1.2million pound a month leak going from the club what are they doing about that?? because i wish somebody would tell me bar sit on 7% apr when they have have to bridge the gap monthly. We have a ray ranson deal (the riddler) where players worth three million who are sold ALL THE MONEY GOES TO HIM so the malaysians dont sell players because theres nothing in it for them yet we take the dont offer new contract to some players worth millions let them leave for free like burke, jay, others route.
If the malaysians are serious about TAKING US TO THE PREM AND GETTING A RETURN both pmg/langston need to go first now if there all going to argue over how things are payed when both partys want a 3rd of what there owned what hope as fans have we got of these deals getting done sometime soon whats worse is when things are agreed yet the malaysians turn around and change it on SIGN HERE day unknown to both partys like already stated. These are the same people who want prem football but wouldnt langston/pmg want more money if we was in the prem due to more money streams comming in to the club like sky money ect ect yet here we are no further than we was 12months ago with both partys that we need to get rid off for sure if we are to move on.
All we get to hear is the malaysians are paying 1.2million pound a month to keep us afloat from fans who claim there some kind of world savious but clearly there not as nothings been getting done about this 1.2million pound every month for two seasons at all nore will it change.
As for all this bidding for him or linked to this player in the press thats another whole story again but above is about PMG/LANGSTON after all nothing is ever going to happen with the 100million dream some fans have been creaming there pants over untill both are from the club so ask yourselfs this WHY ARE THEY STILL HERE if the malaysians want to move on and have 100million yet do not agree to agreements already agreed but only change the angle on the agreements when all partys are sat around a table.
If people want to reply to this with there i know nothing or wall of text bullshit then fine but what ive wrote is nothing else but 100% of what i know is going on and went on in the past (last few weeks)
Thu May 31, 2012 5:41 pm
Thu May 31, 2012 5:44 pm