you needed proof he was making it up??!
Mate, he said City could be bankrolled in the billions ffs

he way aswell have said squillions... although even then some would still believe him.
No wonder the Malaysians can walk in and change our club from under our noses, people cling on to everyones word and take it as gospel without looking at the possible reasons behind them saying it.
Carl and Annis have clearly been scaremongered into thinking the club goes under without Tan or misled to believe we will be Europs best with the investment.... and thus dont want anyone to oppose it so are embelishing the truth to get you blinkered, deleting threads opposing them, banning usernames that express concern etc etc
But 2 points...
1) £100 million isnt that much. Wigan earned that in 2 seasons, the Jacks earned £63 million just in the last financial year... they get to spend it on what they like - we are hamstrung by the fact most of it is being spent on stuff we dont need, but it does make the club more attractive to sell as it will be buying real estate.
2) STILL no word, and totally ignored when someone bring up the glaringly obvious fact that we STILL lose £1.3 million a month and £15 million a season.... even more when we add the wages of the new players and will be in the same debt we are now (£70-£80 million) in 4 years time. Nobody is interested though as Carl makes his sensational claims. Next Man City dont you know

who knew all it took was Wigans revenue for 2 seasons