Fri May 11, 2012 7:48 am
Fri May 11, 2012 7:52 am
Fri May 11, 2012 7:54 am
krabb wrote:totally wrong.....all handled badly and what response did they expect,did there advisers not tell them that problems lay ahead,it should never have got to the point where it was leaked out.they super successful business men but in my eyes they got this wrong,but i do not condone the reaction of people who have sent threats etc....![]()
![]()
Fri May 11, 2012 7:57 am
BigGwynram wrote:krabb wrote:totally wrong.....all handled badly and what response did they expect,did there advisers not tell them that problems lay ahead,it should never have got to the point where it was leaked out.they super successful business men but in my eyes they got this wrong,but i do not condone the reaction of people who have sent threats etc....![]()
![]()
Yes they have said so in their statement, have you read it, they apologised for causing upset and that it wasn't their intention, they have decided not to push the change on us, but also stated that the 100 million pound investment went along with what they seen as a necessary change to progress the business.
Are you saying that they should just say sorry and here's the money anyway.