Fri May 04, 2012 10:09 am
Fri May 04, 2012 10:18 am
Fri May 04, 2012 10:21 am
KingEarnshaw wrote:What's to be positive about at this current time? In all fairness most of what he says makes sense.
Fri May 04, 2012 10:22 am
Pontyclun Blue wrote:KingEarnshaw wrote:What's to be positive about at this current time? In all fairness most of what he says makes sense.
We made the playoffs, who thought that at the start of the season, thats positive
Fri May 04, 2012 10:24 am
Pontyclun Blue wrote:KingEarnshaw wrote:What's to be positive about at this current time? In all fairness most of what he says makes sense.
We made the playoffs, who thought that at the start of the season, thats positive
Fri May 04, 2012 10:26 am
KingEarnshaw wrote:What's to be positive about at this current time? In all fairness most of what he says makes sense.
Fri May 04, 2012 10:26 am
CantonMagic wrote:Pontyclun Blue wrote:KingEarnshaw wrote:What's to be positive about at this current time? In all fairness most of what he says makes sense.
We made the playoffs, who thought that at the start of the season, thats positive
How thick can you be. Wake up ffs.
Yes we made the play-offs, nice one. Thats hardly going to console us next year is it when we have to comply with FA regulations. Can I ask where are we going to find the extra £6 million income from needed to survive? Can I ask who are we going to replace the players we must offload to meet wage limits considering we will have nothing to spend?
Negative? I call it realistic.
Fri May 04, 2012 10:27 am
CantonMagic wrote:Pontyclun Blue wrote:KingEarnshaw wrote:What's to be positive about at this current time? In all fairness most of what he says makes sense.
We made the playoffs, who thought that at the start of the season, thats positive
How thick can you be. Wake up ffs.
Yes we made the play-offs, nice one. Thats hardly going to console us next year is it when we have to comply with FA regulations. Can I ask where are we going to find the extra £6 million income from needed to survive? Can I ask who are we going to replace the players we must offload to meet wage limits considering we will have nothing to spend?
Negative? I call it realistic.
Fri May 04, 2012 10:28 am
Overthemoon wrote:CantonMagic wrote:Pontyclun Blue wrote:KingEarnshaw wrote:What's to be positive about at this current time? In all fairness most of what he says makes sense.
We made the playoffs, who thought that at the start of the season, thats positive
How thick can you be. Wake up ffs.
Yes we made the play-offs, nice one. Thats hardly going to console us next year is it when we have to comply with FA regulations. Can I ask where are we going to find the extra £6 million income from needed to survive? Can I ask who are we going to replace the players we must offload to meet wage limits considering we will have nothing to spend?
Negative? I call it realistic.
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=78530
Fri May 04, 2012 10:32 am
Nedd Glas wrote:Overthemoon wrote:CantonMagic wrote:Pontyclun Blue wrote:KingEarnshaw wrote:What's to be positive about at this current time? In all fairness most of what he says makes sense.
We made the playoffs, who thought that at the start of the season, thats positive
How thick can you be. Wake up ffs.
Yes we made the play-offs, nice one. Thats hardly going to console us next year is it when we have to comply with FA regulations. Can I ask where are we going to find the extra £6 million income from needed to survive? Can I ask who are we going to replace the players we must offload to meet wage limits considering we will have nothing to spend?
Negative? I call it realistic.
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=78530
I think you may have missed the point of my post there. Never mind.
Fri May 04, 2012 10:34 am
Overthemoon wrote:Nedd Glas wrote:Overthemoon wrote:CantonMagic wrote:Pontyclun Blue wrote:KingEarnshaw wrote:What's to be positive about at this current time? In all fairness most of what he says makes sense.
We made the playoffs, who thought that at the start of the season, thats positive
How thick can you be. Wake up ffs.
Yes we made the play-offs, nice one. Thats hardly going to console us next year is it when we have to comply with FA regulations. Can I ask where are we going to find the extra £6 million income from needed to survive? Can I ask who are we going to replace the players we must offload to meet wage limits considering we will have nothing to spend?
Negative? I call it realistic.
viewtopic.php?f=2&t=78530
I think you may have missed the point of my post there. Never mind.
Nope!
Fri May 04, 2012 10:39 am
Fri May 04, 2012 10:45 am
Overthemoon wrote:So why did you choose to start another thread on him then?![]()
Fri May 04, 2012 10:47 am
KingEarnshaw wrote:Pontyclun Blue wrote:KingEarnshaw wrote:What's to be positive about at this current time? In all fairness most of what he says makes sense.
We made the playoffs, who thought that at the start of the season, thats positive
And we were in the top 2 in January? Expectations change, do they not?
Are you honestly telling me you weren't p!ssed off with our failure to strengthen?
Fri May 04, 2012 10:47 am
Nedd Glas wrote:Overthemoon wrote:So why did you choose to start another thread on him then?![]()
Oh dear, let's spell it out.
Certain people, the new arrival King Earnshaw amongst them, appear to not be aware of what he is all about, so I thought I'd help out. Sometimes subtlety just doesn't work, so I'll adopt the direct approach in future.
I don't believe he should be banned, like some suggested yesterday, but if he posts something and people know he's full of ****, then he'll eventually go somewhere else due to boredom.
How's that?
Fri May 04, 2012 10:51 am
CantonMagic wrote:Nedd Glas wrote:Overthemoon wrote:So why did you choose to start another thread on him then?![]()
Oh dear, let's spell it out.
Certain people, the new arrival King Earnshaw amongst them, appear to not be aware of what he is all about, so I thought I'd help out. Sometimes subtlety just doesn't work, so I'll adopt the direct approach in future.
I don't believe he should be banned, like some suggested yesterday, but if he posts something and people know he's full of ****, then he'll eventually go somewhere else due to boredom.
How's that?
So which part of my post do you disagree with then? Its not my opinion, its fact that is available to everyone.
Fri May 04, 2012 10:54 am
Nedd Glas wrote:Overthemoon wrote:So why did you choose to start another thread on him then?![]()
Oh dear, let's spell it out.
Certain people, the new arrival King Earnshaw amongst them, appear to not be aware of what he is all about, so I thought I'd help out. Sometimes subtlety just doesn't work, so I'll adopt the direct approach in future.
I don't believe he should be banned, like some suggested yesterday, but if he posts something and people know he's full of ****, then he'll eventually go somewhere else due to boredom.
How's that?
Fri May 04, 2012 10:58 am
Overthemoon wrote:Nedd Glas wrote:Overthemoon wrote:So why did you choose to start another thread on him then?![]()
Oh dear, let's spell it out.
Certain people, the new arrival King Earnshaw amongst them, appear to not be aware of what he is all about, so I thought I'd help out. Sometimes subtlety just doesn't work, so I'll adopt the direct approach in future.
I don't believe he should be banned, like some suggested yesterday, but if he posts something and people know he's full of ****, then he'll eventually go somewhere else due to boredom.
How's that?
I fully understood your point, but having suggested that all posters ignore him and possibly King Earnshaw, you started another thread, thereby giving him more airtime!
Surely you'd have been better off, either posting your feelings on his last thread or just ignoring him yourself!
Fri May 04, 2012 11:11 am
Nedd Glas wrote:CantonMagic wrote:Nedd Glas wrote:Overthemoon wrote:So why did you choose to start another thread on him then?![]()
Oh dear, let's spell it out.
Certain people, the new arrival King Earnshaw amongst them, appear to not be aware of what he is all about, so I thought I'd help out. Sometimes subtlety just doesn't work, so I'll adopt the direct approach in future.
I don't believe he should be banned, like some suggested yesterday, but if he posts something and people know he's full of ****, then he'll eventually go somewhere else due to boredom.
How's that?
So which part of my post do you disagree with then? Its not my opinion, its fact that is available to everyone.
One question for you:
what was the purpose of your posts prior to yesterday's game, as they all seemed negative?
Fri May 04, 2012 12:25 pm
Fri May 04, 2012 12:28 pm
langley wrote:look he is an attention seeker, maybe he is a Cardiff fan, but i dont think he is, not a fan, maybe a follower of our club
he comes across as a plastic, glory hunter, if he had supported cardiff from the 70's then he would know how far we have come.
Let him moan if it makes him happy, just feel sorry for him ,must have a miserable life.
BLUEBIRDS BLUEBIRDS