Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

" Malky WHY do you sit back when we take lead ? " "

Mon Apr 09, 2012 3:56 pm

Thats why we draw - at home you have to be more attack minded .....................ARGHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

We keep on blowing Home games - SORT IT OUT !!!!!!

Teams around drop points we need to capitalise - Brighton can now over take us

Not enough depth in squad - Why did you not buy or loan ???

2 points dropped - NOT GOOD ENOUGH !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

MM is he the man to take us forward - nope !!

Re: Malky WHY do you sit back when we take lead ?

Mon Apr 09, 2012 4:04 pm

The truth is we are not that good.

I admit we need to be more aggressive at home, but calm down because because we could beat Brum, West ham or blackpool over 2 legs anyway.

Re: Malky WHY do you sit back when we take lead ?

Mon Apr 09, 2012 4:07 pm

sorry- should be couldn't beat ........

Re: Malky WHY do you sit back when we take lead ?

Mon Apr 09, 2012 4:08 pm

llan bluebird wrote:The truth is we are not that good.

I admit we need to be more aggressive at home, but calm down because because we could beat Brum, West ham or blackpool over 2 legs anyway.


cant see it cos we cant score goals ..need more than 1 to win over 2 legs.

Re: Malky WHY do you sit back when we take lead ?

Mon Apr 09, 2012 4:10 pm

Brighton tough matches , Borough panicking , watch leicester though - we have to win at home though :ayatollah: :ayatollah:

Re: Malky WHY do you sit back when we take lead ?

Mon Apr 09, 2012 4:10 pm

wen was last time we had a good 2nd half performance?

the team aren't fit enough.

Norwich city last year, - fittest side in the league and it paid dividence in the final run in

Re: Malky WHY do you sit back when we take lead ?

Mon Apr 09, 2012 4:16 pm

Non signings the issue - MM needs to get to the level we are - no experience at top level at this stage

Re: Malky WHY do you sit back when we take lead ?

Mon Apr 09, 2012 4:33 pm

agreed truth is we are not a particularly good side at the moment, why Kadeem still isn't appearing on the bench I don't know he must be really poor, or is that the player Malky has fallen out with.

The defending at their goal was awful, we pushed up and didn't track the run of any of the 3 players they had on the far post, truly awful.

I counted 3 shots on target, at home that isn't good enough, sadly I'm not enjoying our performances at the moment.

Blake should have come on for Lawrence too.

Re: Malky WHY do you sit back when we take lead ?

Mon Apr 09, 2012 5:42 pm

Correct me if im wrong but we were winning playing 4-5-1, we only conceded when for some very strange reason MM changed to 4-4-2.

Re: Malky WHY do you sit back when we take lead ?

Mon Apr 09, 2012 6:22 pm

2blue2handle wrote:Correct me if im wrong but we were winning playing 4-5-1, we only conceded when for some very strange reason MM changed to 4-4-2.


No reply to this yet?



People seem to have magical ideas that anything different to what we're doing is an improvement.

We begged for Hudson back when we were leaking goals with Turner and Gerrard in defence, we begged for 4-5-1 when we weren't scoring with Rudy and Miller up front and now we're begging for 4-4-2 because that means we'll concede less goals? :/

Re: Malky WHY do you sit back when we take lead ?

Mon Apr 09, 2012 6:25 pm

Aramore wrote:
2blue2handle wrote:Correct me if im wrong but we were winning playing 4-5-1, we only conceded when for some very strange reason MM changed to 4-4-2.


No reply to this yet?



People seem to have magical ideas that anything different to what we're doing is an improvement.

We begged for Hudson back when we were leaking goals with Turner and Gerrard in defence, we begged for 4-5-1 when we weren't scoring with Rudy and Miller up front and now we're begging for 4-4-2 because that means we'll concede less goals? :/


Was just about to say similar. Add to that the desire to drop Marshall everytime we conced a goal.

Re: Malky WHY do you sit back when we take lead ?

Mon Apr 09, 2012 6:28 pm

PtB wrote:
Aramore wrote:
2blue2handle wrote:Correct me if im wrong but we were winning playing 4-5-1, we only conceded when for some very strange reason MM changed to 4-4-2.


No reply to this yet?



People seem to have magical ideas that anything different to what we're doing is an improvement.

We begged for Hudson back when we were leaking goals with Turner and Gerrard in defence, we begged for 4-5-1 when we weren't scoring with Rudy and Miller up front and now we're begging for 4-4-2 because that means we'll concede less goals? :/


Was just about to say similar. Add to that the desire to drop Marshall everytime we conced a goal.


WE SHOULD DROP MARSHALL WE CONCEDED A GOAL!

Re: Malky WHY do you sit back when we take lead ?

Mon Apr 09, 2012 6:37 pm

llan bluebird wrote:The truth is we are not that good.

I admit we need to be more aggressive at home, but calm down because because we could beat Brum, West ham or blackpool over 2 legs anyway.


WE have 2 secure a play off place to do that and we aint there yet mate.

Re: Malky WHY do you sit back when we take lead ?

Mon Apr 09, 2012 8:11 pm

2blue2handle wrote:Correct me if im wrong but we were winning playing 4-5-1, we only conceded when for some very strange reason MM changed to 4-4-2.


We didn't actually play 4-4-2, we played 4-4-1-1 as we did all game. Alternated between Earnie and Miller with Gunnarson moved from that position to the right.

Our main issue is what the hell has happened to Championship player of the year contender Whittingham! He looks totally lost wherever he is playing and has no ideas anymore what to do with the ball