Labour Rag
Tue Apr 03, 2012 6:05 pm
Might be true, but what a cheek. At least you're consistent!
http://m.guardian.co.uk/football/blog/2 ... pe=article
BTW, don't shoot the messenger.
http://m.guardian.co.uk/football/blog/2 ... pe=article
BTW, don't shoot the messenger.
Re: Labour Rag
Tue Apr 03, 2012 6:31 pm
white heat wrote:Might be true, but what a cheek. At least you're consistent!
http://m.guardian.co.uk/football/blog/2 ... pe=article
BTW, don't shoot the messenger.
Some good points in the article-the best part being the lack of transfer window activity and only 13 players used in 8 games in a month.
Re: Labour Rag
Tue Apr 03, 2012 6:53 pm
All banter aside, I still wouldn't bet against you making the play off's, but its going to be tough this year. I think that S'oton & the Royals auto. The play off's are a lottery, but Dobbie could make it three in a row.
Re: Labour Rag
Tue Apr 03, 2012 7:02 pm
white heat wrote:All banter aside, I still wouldn't bet against you making the play off's, but its going to be tough this year. I think that S'oton & the Royals auto. The play off's are a lottery, but Dobbie could make it three in a row.
Anything is possible with ccfc. Reading will go up as will saints if lallana and lambert stay fit. If we got to play off final I'd want west ham as they would be under huge pressure.
Re: Labour Rag
Tue Apr 03, 2012 7:39 pm
The Guardian supported the Liberal Democrats in the last general election.
Re: Labour Rag
Tue Apr 03, 2012 9:53 pm
who penned that, a jack? 
CCFC
CCFC