Team for Burnley

1 Heaton
2 Quinn
3 Naylor
4 Keinan
5 Gerrard
6 Kiss
7 Conway
8 Blake
9 Mcphail
10 Ralls
11 Earnie

1 Heaton
2 Quinn
3 Naylor
4 Keinan
5 Gerrard
6 Kiss
7 Conway
8 Blake
9 Mcphail
10 Ralls
11 Earnie

.................Marshall
.....Huds...turner....gerrard
Kev............................Taylor
..............rails.....mcphail
....................mason
.............earnie......miller

Wing backs for added width and more attacking options, obviously leaving out Whitts and gunner for a rest, miller will have to wait til next game for his rest

My point being, rest the eleven who played against Hull as a "new" eleven would all have a point to prove. We're all pissed off to lose but things can only get better.

Marshall

Kev
Hudson
Turner
Taylor

Kiss
Conway
Witts
Cowie

Mason
Miller

Subs
Blake mcphail Lawrence Gunarrson Earnie

Heaton

McNaughton Blake Turner Taylor

Cowie Whittingham Gunnar Conway

Mason Earnshaw

Subs: Marshall Hudson Lawrence Miller McPhail/Kiss

Marshall

Naylor, Turner, Hudson, Darcy

Conway, Kiss, McPhail, Whitts, Harris

Miller

Subs: Heaton, Earnie, Mason, Gunnarson, Kev.

Marshall in goals because he has been the one to stop us going 6 down at times.

Naylor in for Taylor, give him a rest, been looking abit jaded as of late.
Darcy in for Kev, same reason.

Conway and Harris to play more advanced in the midfield to almost make it a 4-3-3/4-5-1 hybrid formation to give Miller more support. Harris to play because he is meant to have pace in abundance, would like to see him take on defenders.

Kiss and Whitts as the central midfielders with room to express themselves in attack with Mcphail played just behind him and infront of the back 4 to allow for better protection and those killer through passes.

Miller as he is the best striker at the club.

Earnie and Mason on the bench as attacking options, would probably use Mason over Earnshaw as he would have a better effect on the field. He is young and hungry for the game with a footballing brain years ahead of his age. Can also be used out wide if needed.

Gunnarson is cover for either centre midfielders or the centre defensive midfielder. Thought that would be a no brainer really.

Kev as he can play all across the back 4.

Marshall

Naylor, Turner, Hudson, Darcy

Conway, Kiss, McPhail, Whitts, Harris

Miller

Subs: Heaton, Earnie, Mason, Gunnarson, Kev.

Marshall in goals because he has been the one to stop us going 6 down at times.

Naylor in for Taylor, give him a rest, been looking abit jaded as of late.
Darcy in for Kev, same reason.

Conway and Harris to play more advanced in the midfield to almost make it a 4-3-3/4-5-1 hybrid formation to give Miller more support. Harris to play because he is meant to have pace in abundance, would like to see him take on defenders.

Kiss and Whitts as the central midfielders with room to express themselves in attack with Mcphail played just behind him and infront of the back 4 to allow for better protection and those killer through passes.

Miller as he is the best striker at the club.

Earnie and Mason on the bench as attacking options, would probably use Mason over Earnshaw as he would have a better effect on the field. He is young and hungry for the game with a footballing brain years ahead of his age. Can also be used out wide if needed.

Gunnarson is cover for either centre midfielders or the centre defensive midfielder. Thought that would be a no brainer really.

Kev as he can play all across the back 4.

I'd be happy to go with that side mate and give it a go. I'd even consider giving kenny a rest and going with mason

Marshall

Naylor, Turner, Hudson, Darcy

Conway, Kiss, McPhail, Whitts, Harris

Miller

Subs: Heaton, Earnie, Mason, Gunnarson, Kev.

Marshall in goals because he has been the one to stop us going 6 down at times.

Naylor in for Taylor, give him a rest, been looking abit jaded as of late.
Darcy in for Kev, same reason.

Conway and Harris to play more advanced in the midfield to almost make it a 4-3-3/4-5-1 hybrid formation to give Miller more support. Harris to play because he is meant to have pace in abundance, would like to see him take on defenders.

Kiss and Whitts as the central midfielders with room to express themselves in attack with Mcphail played just behind him and infront of the back 4 to allow for better protection and those killer through passes.

Miller as he is the best striker at the club.

Earnie and Mason on the bench as attacking options, would probably use Mason over Earnshaw as he would have a better effect on the field. He is young and hungry for the game with a footballing brain years ahead of his age. Can also be used out wide if needed.

Gunnarson is cover for either centre midfielders or the centre defensive midfielder. Thought that would be a no brainer really.

Kev as he can play all across the back 4.

I'd be happy to go with that side mate and give it a go. I'd even consider giving kenny a rest and going with mason

I was tempted to put Mason on instead of Kenny, but then I remembered the impact Mason was making from the bench was tremendous, defenses could not handle the runs and plays he was making.

-----------------Marshall-----------------
Blake----Hudson----Turner----Taylor
---------------Kiss/Gunnar--------------
Lawrence-----------------------Conway
------------------Whitts------------------
--------------Mason-----Earnie

Whitts is wasted in that holding role IMO, he's got a wicked left wand and his through balls would be great for the strikers to pounce on. Instead of all that hoofball shit

---------------Marshall -------------

Blake - Gerrard - Turner - Taylor

----Cowie-Gunnarsson-------

--------Whittingham------------

Lawrence--------------Conway

-----------Miller---------

---------------Marshall -------------

Blake - Gerrard - Turner - Taylor

----Cowie-Gunnarsson-------

--------Whittingham------------

Lawrence--------------Conway

-----------Miller---------

I thought thats not a bad team and then I seen Gerrard

1 Heaton
2 Quinn
3 Naylor
4 Keinan
5 Gerrard
6 Kiss
7 Conway
8 Blake
9 Mcphail
10 Ralls
11 Earnie

Good fresh choice considering the situation of fatigue and bad luck.
Would be interesting to see how that 11 would do

This would be my team...



Although certain players (Miller) are struggling for form I don't think you could drop them as it would destroy confidence.

However, I think Kev, Cowie and Gunnar are all showing signs of needing a rest - not just their legs but their brains seem fried.

Whitts playing deep works in some games and he is our best player at linking play, but I feel he could cause more problems further up the pitch... especially at home.

Earnie may not be the long term answer to our striker problem but he is buzzing with a point to prove at the moment. I would start him alongside Kenny. Mason has been great but he's still a kid and we're struggling.

I think we have missed Conway and why not give Kadeem Harris game time - we need width, pace and someone to lift the crowd.

I cant see this team being picked but I'd love to see it happen.

Just my opinion of course

----------------------HEATON--------------------
BLAKE------GERRARD--TURNER------TAYLOR
------------------KISS/McPHAIL-----------------
CONWAY--------GUNNARSSON---------COWIE
---------WHITTINGHAM------------------------
------------------MASON------------------------

SUBS:- MARSHALL,McNAUGHTON,HUDSON,MILLER,LAWRENCE/KISS

I would go for:

-----------------Heaton-----------------
Blake----Hudson----Turner----Taylor
---------------Kiss/Macca--------------
Cowie----Gunnar----Whitts----Conway
------------------------------------
------------------Mason------------------

Subs: Mcnaughton, Lawrence, Harris, Miller, Earnshaw

Eleven park players from a sunday league team who will give 100% as they have it to give will do me vs burnley not 50% in the tank players playing the same shit we done for 2months+ week in week out and a manager who does not know another formation or any sort of wide play does not help either

Marshall

Blake
Hudson
Turner
Mc Naughton

Lawrence
Whitts
Conway

Cowie

Earnshaw
Mason