Would you take a gamble and sell Whitts..?

Nah.

not in a million years, would qpr of sold taraabt last season?

No i'm guessin a sizeable chunk would go 2 ray ranson?

Only you and bluebird1977 say theres no money.....MM and TG say there is.

Most money goes to Ranson and I dont believe it helps, we would sell at an inflated price but have to buy at inflated prices.

No i'm guessin a sizeable chunk would go 2 ray ranson?

thats the problem

the question was IF that money could be put towards 2 or 3 new faces.....so yes I would if that was the case....but it isn't....

No

Before people start shouting at their laptop scene this is only a question.

People say that theres no money for signings which is probably right so would you sell Whitts if that money could be put to 2/3 fresh faces..?

Yes for £4 mill.

nope,getting a replacement would be impossible

nope,getting a replacement would be impossible

like to add i was around when we sold tosh

I was around when we sold Tosh too. It's difficult now to describe how angry people were. Not with Tosh himself, but with the club. It proved that we were not serious about promotion to the top flight. Are we serious now ?

we dont have to directly replace whitts we could have 3 decent players for him instead.

personally if we did receive an offer of 4-5 mil, i would accept and bring in , kebe, noone and mcgugan plus one other if pos..

NO He's our engine in midfield.

not in a million years, would qpr of sold taraabt last season?

whitts isn't god

hes had his good spell now and now he's back to having quiet games not doing a massive amount

not in a million years, would qpr of sold taraabt last season?

whitts isn't god

hes had his good spell now and now he's back to having quiet games not doing a massive amount

Well that's my whole belief system thrown out the window.

Hell no.

We'd be worse off without Whitts than with Whitts and no signings.

WHITTS HAS TO STAY.