Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:04 am
Midfield general wrote:With more and more foerign owners will there ever be another long serving manager like Alex Ferguson or in our case Dave Jones again as they all seem to be trigger happy when results don;t go their way.
Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:05 am
Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:13 am
Midfield general wrote:2blue2handle wrote:I wouldn't say ours were trigger happy, to me they made the right decision at the right time.
Fernandes is a joke, media junky who loves the limelight, only bought qpr because he couldn't afford west ham.
They will stay up and over spend for 2-3 years before a massive decent.
Ok whilst I agree with you they weren't tigger happy I would say that they didn't go about the sacking of DJ in the correct manner.
You've mentioned about Fernandes being a joke and a media junky but surely he's just doing what others on the board are saying about our Malaysians and that is using the club for the benefit of their other businesses..?
Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:19 am
Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:19 am
Midfield general wrote:2blue2handle wrote:Midfield general wrote:2blue2handle wrote:I wouldn't say ours were trigger happy, to me they made the right decision at the right time.
Fernandes is a joke, media junky who loves the limelight, only bought qpr because he couldn't afford west ham.
They will stay up and over spend for 2-3 years before a massive decent.
Ok whilst I agree with you they weren't tigger happy I would say that they didn't go about the sacking of DJ in the correct manner.
You've mentioned about Fernandes being a joke and a media junky but surely he's just doing what others on the board are saying about our Malaysians and that is using the club for the benefit of their other businesses..?
Why about DJ?
From what I understand they asked DJ what it took to get us up and they disagrees and dispensed with his services. I'm a DJ fan but it was time to go.
I'm on about Fernandes the person who wouldn't be more opposite than Tan if he tried.
I agree it was time for him to go but that 2 week period after the Reading game was just bizarre and DJ has stated that they tried to get promotion last season 'on the cheap'. Personally he should have been sacked the following morning not wait so long to take the action required. Then there was a further few weeks before they appointed MM which makes it even more incredible of how far he has taken us with so limited time.
Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:26 am
Midfield general wrote:polo wrote:MG on his anti malaysian bandwagon again.
I dont think ive ever seen VT give an interview unlike fernandes who is a media whore.
It was time for dj to go.
Anti-foreign owners full stop. They are wrecking the game in my opinion and Ive agreed that it was time for DJ to go just should have done it far quicker than what they did and allowed the new man (MM) even more time before the season started.
Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:27 am
Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:28 am
2blue2handle wrote:Ideally it would have been earlier but on the flip side imagine the mess we could be in now if we had a Me Shearer or whoever
Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:29 am
Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:32 am
Midfield general wrote:polo wrote:2blue2handle wrote:Ideally it would have been earlier but on the flip side imagine the mess we could be in now if we had a Me Shearer or whoever
Shudder
Yes and the respect has to go to Gethin Jones and Alan Whiteley for sticking by their first choice decision as the Malaysians wanted Shearer.
Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:33 am
Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:34 am
Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:35 am
boxerbob wrote:In all fairness MG,we could go up this year and you would still ctiticise our owners
Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:36 am
polo wrote:boxerbob wrote:In all fairness MG,we could go up this year and you would still ctiticise our owners
FACT
Dayas puppet
Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:39 am
Midfield general wrote:polo wrote:I think taking a little time to get the right man has bared fruit has it not?
You dont just sack someone and give the job to the furst candidate.
Well they give him 12 months notice before last season started!!!
Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:39 am
Midfield general wrote:polo wrote:I think taking a little time to get the right man has bared fruit has it not?
You dont just sack someone and give the job to the furst candidate.
Well they give him 12 months notice before last season started!!!
Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:41 am
boxerbob wrote:polo wrote:boxerbob wrote:In all fairness MG,we could go up this year and you would still ctiticise our owners
FACT
Dayas puppet
lol i thought you 2 was friends
Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:44 am
Midfield general wrote:polo wrote:Midfield general wrote:polo wrote:I think taking a little time to get the right man has bared fruit has it not?
You dont just sack someone and give the job to the furst candidate.
Well they give him 12 months notice before last season started!!!
Yes im sure nil nil going into the reading home game their immediate thoughts were interviewing candudates for jones job.
They interviewed O'Niell for the job over in Malaysia during the middle of last season.
Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:44 am
Midfield general wrote:polo wrote:Midfield general wrote:polo wrote:I think taking a little time to get the right man has bared fruit has it not?
You dont just sack someone and give the job to the furst candidate.
Well they give him 12 months notice before last season started!!!
Yes im sure nil nil going into the reading home game their immediate thoughts were interviewing candudates for jones job.
They interviewed O'Niell for the job over in Malaysia during the middle of last season.
Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:46 am
Midfield general wrote:boxerbob wrote:Midfield general wrote:polo wrote:Midfield general wrote:polo wrote:I think taking a little time to get the right man has bared fruit has it not?
You dont just sack someone and give the job to the furst candidate.
Well they give him 12 months notice before last season started!!!
Yes im sure nil nil going into the reading home game their immediate thoughts were interviewing candudates for jones job.
They interviewed O'Niell for the job over in Malaysia during the middle of last season.
Was there there actually any truth in that?
Well even if I said yes would you believe me..?
Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:53 am
boxerbob wrote:i thought it was just hear say
Mon Jan 09, 2012 12:54 am
Midfield general wrote:boxerbob wrote:i thought it was just hear say
Like many others things on this forum unfortunately.
Mon Jan 09, 2012 1:01 am
Midfield general wrote:boxerbob wrote:Midfield general wrote:boxerbob wrote:i thought it was just hear say
Like many others things on this forum unfortunately.
I just cant you see why you need to slate vincent tan so often,at least we aint got baliffs at our door anymore
Ive just mentioned foerign owners as a whole, it was others who tried to challange me on Tan and all I am saying is that the way the club dealt with the sacking of DJ wasn't the best. Whether it was time for DJ to go or not has completely nothing to do with it.
Mon Jan 09, 2012 1:12 am
Mon Jan 09, 2012 1:12 am
Ive praised his business dealings but unfortunately most of them are based in Asia so it seems that he is using the club to help attract business to Asia rather than the UK.
Mon Jan 09, 2012 6:05 am
Midfield general wrote:boxerbob wrote:Midfield general wrote:boxerbob wrote:i thought it was just hear say
Like many others things on this forum unfortunately.
I just cant you see why you need to slate vincent tan so often,at least we aint got baliffs at our door anymore
Ive just mentioned foerign owners as a whole, it was others who tried to challange me on Tan and all I am saying is that the way the club dealt with the sacking of DJ wasn't the best. Whether it was time for DJ to go or not has completely nothing to do with it.
Mon Jan 09, 2012 6:07 am
Midfield general wrote:boxerbob wrote:Midfield general wrote:boxerbob wrote:i thought it was just hear say
Like many others things on this forum unfortunately.
I just cant you see why you need to slate vincent tan so often,at least we aint got baliffs at our door anymore
Ive just mentioned foerign owners as a whole, it was others who tried to challange me on Tan and all I am saying is that the way the club dealt with the sacking of DJ wasn't the best. Whether it was time for DJ to go or not has completely nothing to do with it.
Mon Jan 09, 2012 7:28 am
Midfield general wrote:2blue2handle wrote:Midfield general wrote:2blue2handle wrote:I wouldn't say ours were trigger happy, to me they made the right decision at the right time.
Fernandes is a joke, media junky who loves the limelight, only bought qpr because he couldn't afford west ham.
They will stay up and over spend for 2-3 years before a massive decent.
Ok whilst I agree with you they weren't tigger happy I would say that they didn't go about the sacking of DJ in the correct manner.
You've mentioned about Fernandes being a joke and a media junky but surely he's just doing what others on the board are saying about our Malaysians and that is using the club for the benefit of their other businesses..?
Why about DJ?
From what I understand they asked DJ what it took to get us up and they disagrees and dispensed with his services. I'm a DJ fan but it was time to go.
I'm on about Fernandes the person who wouldn't be more opposite than Tan if he tried.
I agree it was time for him to go but that 2 week period after the Reading game was just bizarre and DJ has stated that they tried to get promotion last season 'on the cheap'. Personally he should have been sacked the following morning not wait so long to take the action required. Then there was a further few weeks before they appointed MM which makes it even more incredible of how far he has taken us with so limited time.
Mon Jan 09, 2012 8:44 am
Midfield general wrote:taffyapple wrote:Midfield general wrote:boxerbob wrote:Midfield general wrote:boxerbob wrote:i thought it was just hear say
Like many others things on this forum unfortunately.
I just cant you see why you need to slate vincent tan so often,at least we aint got baliffs at our door anymore
Ive just mentioned foerign owners as a whole, it was others who tried to challange me on Tan and all I am saying is that the way the club dealt with the sacking of DJ wasn't the best. Whether it was time for DJ to go or not has completely nothing to do with it.
TRIED to challenge you on Tan??? all people are asking for is some form of proof
as to why they are 'chancers' and are using Cardiff City
You have an agenda re: our owners. God alone knows who put the idea in your head.
Its been a week since Carls update, the one where HIS sources underlined to him just
how much they are backing the Club and the Manager. Still no comment from you on it.
Had Carls update been a negative one, you'd have been all over it like a rash "i told
you so" etc etc etc... Whoever is pulling your strings has a bitterness about Cardiff City
and certainly no love, and your buying everything they tell you.
You have slated Vincent Tan for many months so can i ask a question...
PLEASE GIVE US AN EXAMPLE OF WHERE HE HAS LIED, MADE FALSE PROMISES, LET
CARDIFF CITY DOWN OR DONE SOMETHING THAT POINTS TO HIM "DOING A RUNNER"
If your going to quote 'Dispatches' yet again... please put up a transcript, or video
of the bits where Tan was in that programme. See, to anyone else watching that, he
said and did...erm... f**k ALL wrong. Except for being seen in the company of someone
dodgy.
I'll repeat myself here, but sod it...
A few weeks back, a vicious unfounded rumour hit the internet about Cardiff City FC
disrespecting someone. You were on here like a flash calling the Club a disgrace.
Basically, you heard something negative about this great Club and believed it straight
away, you did not wait, you did not give City the benefit of the doubt, you jumped
on the Club and shat on it. What kind of supporter does that??... The particular issue
was something Cardiff City have a long proud history of doing the right thing on.
Yet you preferred to take an internet rumour as gospel. Because it showed Cardiff in
a bad light.
Cardiff City supporter my arse[/quote]
Sorry TaffyPlastic remind me one again 'when was the last time you actually watched CCFC..?' and Im not talking about on the TV!!!! More of a supporter you will ever be
Mon Jan 09, 2012 9:09 am