Wed Nov 02, 2011 10:36 pm
Wed Nov 02, 2011 10:37 pm
Wed Nov 02, 2011 10:38 pm
Wed Nov 02, 2011 10:38 pm
Wed Nov 02, 2011 10:38 pm
Wed Nov 02, 2011 10:40 pm
Bowmonster wrote:Where are all the Hudson haters now eh![]()
You fickle lot
Wed Nov 02, 2011 10:41 pm
taffyapple wrote:Bowmonster wrote:Where are all the Hudson haters now eh![]()
You fickle lot
Just went up in my estimation 100%
Wed Nov 02, 2011 10:42 pm
Merlin wrote:More like a plum!!
Wed Nov 02, 2011 10:48 pm
Wed Nov 02, 2011 10:49 pm
jinks-rct wrote:he was up against a depleted derby attack that had a 15yr old kid involved.
although i will never boo hudson or any other city player when hes up against someone good he gets turned and struggles
Wed Nov 02, 2011 10:49 pm
Wed Nov 02, 2011 10:51 pm
Wed Nov 02, 2011 10:51 pm
Bowmonster wrote:taffyapple wrote:Bowmonster wrote:Where are all the Hudson haters now eh![]()
You fickle lot
Just went up in my estimation 100%
![]()
Wed Nov 02, 2011 10:52 pm
, Ihad a couple of those myself over the years in the ring.Wed Nov 02, 2011 10:53 pm
ccfc_cotta wrote:7-10 days hopefully, Ihad a couple of those myself over the years in the ring.
if thats his dominant eye he should be rested saturday
Wed Nov 02, 2011 10:53 pm
Wed Nov 02, 2011 10:56 pm
Wed Nov 02, 2011 10:59 pm
Wed Nov 02, 2011 11:04 pm
TopCat CCFC wrote:Im sure Radio Wales said he got that black eye,when he went into a header with the 15 year old striker from Derby
Wed Nov 02, 2011 11:34 pm
Wed Nov 02, 2011 11:37 pm
ReeseBluebird1927 wrote:he ran into turner lol he tried a miller!!!
Wed Nov 02, 2011 11:46 pm
PtB wrote:He might have been up against a 15 year old, but that boy is in their squad because they think he is good enough.
At the end of the day, he's played 80 minutes like that and we'[ve kept a clean sheet away from home on the back of a hard game at Leeds. Nothing but credit due in my book.
Thu Nov 03, 2011 2:05 am
Thu Nov 03, 2011 9:03 am
Thu Nov 03, 2011 9:07 am
jinks-rct wrote:PtB wrote:He might have been up against a 15 year old, but that boy is in their squad because they think he is good enough.
At the end of the day, he's played 80 minutes like that and we'[ve kept a clean sheet away from home on the back of a hard game at Leeds. Nothing but credit due in my book.
no hes in the squad because they have injuries if derby were at full strength he wouldnt play
Thu Nov 03, 2011 10:48 am
Thu Nov 03, 2011 11:32 am
PtB wrote:jinks-rct wrote:PtB wrote:He might have been up against a 15 year old, but that boy is in their squad because they think he is good enough.
At the end of the day, he's played 80 minutes like that and we'[ve kept a clean sheet away from home on the back of a hard game at Leeds. Nothing but credit due in my book.
no hes in the squad because they have injuries if derby were at full strength he wouldnt play
He kept Chris Maguire out the side last week when he was fully fit. He's in the squad because they are shit!
Thu Nov 03, 2011 11:37 am
Thu Nov 03, 2011 11:50 am
jinks-rct wrote:PtB wrote:jinks-rct wrote:PtB wrote:He might have been up against a 15 year old, but that boy is in their squad because they think he is good enough.
At the end of the day, he's played 80 minutes like that and we'[ve kept a clean sheet away from home on the back of a hard game at Leeds. Nothing but credit due in my book.
no hes in the squad because they have injuries if derby were at full strength he wouldnt play
He kept Chris Maguire out the side last week when he was fully fit. He's in the squad because they are shit!
hes up against a pacey team saturday see how he plays and if he gets turned or messes up.. if he copes come back and i'll admit im slightly wrong about him![]()
Thu Nov 03, 2011 11:50 am
Bowmonster wrote:Where are all the Hudson haters now eh![]()
You fickle lot