Fri Sep 30, 2011 5:30 pm
Fri Sep 30, 2011 5:34 pm
Forever Blue wrote:I Would of liked to have seen at least 3 loan players and I feel for Malky, he cant keep performing miracles, his budget on players wages were already way below what Dave Jones was given. Malky has been working 24/7 to bring players in, but of course clubs wanted us to pay a big percentage of their wages, plus loan fees. I honestly am disappointed as Malky went for 6 players,if only he had more in his budget or seen as we are going places more was made available. Also in the transfer deadline Malky should have been given more, then he would not have been scratching around for loan players. Just my opinion of course.
I am worried because these players and are manager are given their all, they will def need support to keep us in the top 6.
Malky's Blue and White army![]()
![]()
Fri Sep 30, 2011 5:36 pm
Fri Sep 30, 2011 5:37 pm
Fri Sep 30, 2011 5:37 pm
Fri Sep 30, 2011 5:41 pm
castleblue wrote:Forever Blue wrote:I Would of liked to have seen at least 3 loan players and I feel for Malky, he cant keep performing miracles, his budget on players wages were already way below what Dave Jones was given. Malky has been working 24/7 to bring players in, but of course clubs wanted us to pay a big percentage of their wages, plus loan fees. I honestly am disappointed as Malky went for 6 players,if only he had more in his budget or seen as we are going places more was made available. Also in the transfer deadline Malky should have been given more, then he would not have been scratching around for loan players. Just my opinion of course.
I am worried because these players and are manager are given their all, they will def need support to keep us in the top 6.
Malky's Blue and White army![]()
![]()
Annis I thought he looked a little tired in his press conference this morning, obviously he has been burning the midnight oil trying to get players in.
Must say though he was in good humour with lots of banter between him and the Journo's. Top Top guy is Malkay Mackay in my opinion.
![]()
![]()
Fri Sep 30, 2011 5:41 pm
Annis I thought he looked a little tired in his press conference this morning, obviously he has been burning the midnight oil trying to get players in.
.
Fri Sep 30, 2011 5:46 pm
Fri Sep 30, 2011 5:50 pm
baseboy007 wrote:A billionaire chairman investing into a club with the aim of getting us into the premier league and sustaining a place in that league, therefore making massive profit margins. I can understand in that case why he falls short of giving the extra cash flow to the manager when we are evidentally player better than expected and could challenge more than we thought this season. 3 players were already needed before our injuries, now it's a bit desperate if I'm honest.
Don't get it.
Fri Sep 30, 2011 6:00 pm
2blue2handle wrote:baseboy007 wrote:A billionaire chairman investing into a club with the aim of getting us into the premier league and sustaining a place in that league, therefore making massive profit margins. I can understand in that case why he falls short of giving the extra cash flow to the manager when we are evidentally player better than expected and could challenge more than we thought this season. 3 players were already needed before our injuries, now it's a bit desperate if I'm honest.
Don't get it.
They have said from the start the aim was to try and make the club self sufficient and that it would be tough times ahead.
EVERYONE was delighted with this when they took over after the mess of the last few years. now like modern day players we have become greedy and want more and more. For me the Malaysians success has been shown by the fact we arent selling every asset and not having HMRC after us every month.
Im not sure who have the shortest memories fish or football fans.
Fri Sep 30, 2011 6:04 pm
2blue2handle wrote:baseboy007 wrote:A billionaire chairman investing into a club with the aim of getting us into the premier league and sustaining a place in that league, therefore making massive profit margins. I can understand in that case why he falls short of giving the extra cash flow to the manager when we are evidentally player better than expected and could challenge more than we thought this season. 3 players were already needed before our injuries, now it's a bit desperate if I'm honest.
Don't get it.
They have said from the start the aim was to try and make the club self sufficient and that it would be tough times ahead.
EVERYONE was delighted with this when they took over after the mess of the last few years. now like modern day players we have become greedy and want more and more. For me the Malaysians success has been shown by the fact we arent selling every asset and not having HMRC after us every month.
Im not sure who have the shortest memories fish or football fans.
If that is the case then I understand more and feel assured...proof is always in the pudding though.
Fri Sep 30, 2011 6:04 pm
2blue2handle wrote:baseboy007 wrote:A billionaire chairman investing into a club with the aim of getting us into the premier league and sustaining a place in that league, therefore making massive profit margins. I can understand in that case why he falls short of giving the extra cash flow to the manager when we are evidentally player better than expected and could challenge more than we thought this season. 3 players were already needed before our injuries, now it's a bit desperate if I'm honest.
Don't get it.
They have said from the start the aim was to try and make the club self sufficient and that it would be tough times ahead.
EVERYONE was delighted with this when they took over after the mess of the last few years. now like modern day players we have become greedy and want more and more. For me the Malaysians success has been shown by the fact we arent selling every asset and not having HMRC after us every month.
Im not sure who have the shortest memories fish or football fans.
Fri Sep 30, 2011 6:08 pm
Fri Sep 30, 2011 6:20 pm
2blue2handle wrote:baseboy007 wrote:A billionaire chairman investing into a club with the aim of getting us into the premier league and sustaining a place in that league, therefore making massive profit margins. I can understand in that case why he falls short of giving the extra cash flow to the manager when we are evidentally player better than expected and could challenge more than we thought this season. 3 players were already needed before our injuries, now it's a bit desperate if I'm honest.
Don't get it.
They have said from the start the aim was to try and make the club self sufficient and that it would be tough times ahead.
EVERYONE was delighted with this when they took over after the mess of the last few years. now like modern day players we have become greedy and want more and more. For me the Malaysians success has been shown by the fact we arent selling every asset and not having HMRC after us every month.
Im not sure who have the shortest memories fish or football fans.
Fri Sep 30, 2011 6:20 pm
Fri Sep 30, 2011 6:22 pm
castleblue wrote:I understand 100% about our owners looking to get the club operating at a sustainable level and I'm sure we all welcome their determination to do that.
Having said that we have 24 players registered, after the loan signing of Elliott Parish, and that is the lowest number since the 2007/08 season. In the 3 seasons since our previous manager had 28 or 29 players available to him so I think it can't be unreasonable to wonder why MM is having to operate either 4 or 5 players lighter than anytime over the past 3 seasons.
Annis has said he would have liked to have seen another 3 loan players and on the basis of squad size last season i.e. 29, when we would hope the club was operating at a sustainable level, then why can't we have 27 players now available to Malky Mackay.
Seems a reasonable point to me.![]()
![]()
![]()
Fri Sep 30, 2011 6:23 pm
SamCCFC1927 wrote:i would have liked to have atleast 2 players in by now
Fri Sep 30, 2011 6:24 pm
Forever Blue wrote:2blue2handle wrote:baseboy007 wrote:A billionaire chairman investing into a club with the aim of getting us into the premier league and sustaining a place in that league, therefore making massive profit margins. I can understand in that case why he falls short of giving the extra cash flow to the manager when we are evidentally player better than expected and could challenge more than we thought this season. 3 players were already needed before our injuries, now it's a bit desperate if I'm honest.
Don't get it.
They have said from the start the aim was to try and make the club self sufficient and that it would be tough times ahead.
EVERYONE was delighted with this when they took over after the mess of the last few years. now like modern day players we have become greedy and want more and more. For me the Malaysians success has been shown by the fact we arent selling every asset and not having HMRC after us every month.
Im not sure who have the shortest memories fish or football fans.
Luke,
I stand by what I said, I was proofed right about Dave Jones you could give him all the money in the world and he would of always failed. Malky just needs a few more players and this Club will really go places. The board has money and Malky needs it now.
Malky's Blue and White army![]()
![]()
Fri Sep 30, 2011 6:26 pm
Forever Blue wrote:castleblue wrote:I understand 100% about our owners looking to get the club operating at a sustainable level and I'm sure we all welcome their determination to do that.
Having said that we have 24 players registered, after the loan signing of Elliott Parish, and that is the lowest number since the 2007/08 season. In the 3 seasons since our previous manager had 28 or 29 players available to him so I think it can't be unreasonable to wonder why MM is having to operate either 4 or 5 players lighter than anytime over the past 3 seasons.
Annis has said he would have liked to have seen another 3 loan players and on the basis of squad size last season i.e. 29, when we would hope the club was operating at a sustainable level, then why can't we have 27 players now available to Malky Mackay.
Seems a reasonable point to me.![]()
![]()
![]()
Cheers Gary, I honestly believe we will come unstuck unless they support Malky and help him Strengthen our squad![]()
Fri Sep 30, 2011 7:05 pm
castleblue wrote:Forever Blue wrote:castleblue wrote:I understand 100% about our owners looking to get the club operating at a sustainable level and I'm sure we all welcome their determination to do that.
Having said that we have 24 players registered, after the loan signing of Elliott Parish, and that is the lowest number since the 2007/08 season. In the 3 seasons since our previous manager had 28 or 29 players available to him so I think it can't be unreasonable to wonder why MM is having to operate either 4 or 5 players lighter than anytime over the past 3 seasons.
Annis has said he would have liked to have seen another 3 loan players and on the basis of squad size last season i.e. 29, when we would hope the club was operating at a sustainable level, then why can't we have 27 players now available to Malky Mackay.
Seems a reasonable point to me.![]()
![]()
![]()
Cheers Gary, I honestly believe we will come unstuck unless they support Malky and help him Strengthen our squad![]()
Annis the last time we ran with a squad of 24 players we finished 12th. Says it all![]()
![]()
Fri Sep 30, 2011 7:29 pm
castleblue wrote:Forever Blue wrote:castleblue wrote:I understand 100% about our owners looking to get the club operating at a sustainable level and I'm sure we all welcome their determination to do that.
Having said that we have 24 players registered, after the loan signing of Elliott Parish, and that is the lowest number since the 2007/08 season. In the 3 seasons since our previous manager had 28 or 29 players available to him so I think it can't be unreasonable to wonder why MM is having to operate either 4 or 5 players lighter than anytime over the past 3 seasons.
Annis has said he would have liked to have seen another 3 loan players and on the basis of squad size last season i.e. 29, when we would hope the club was operating at a sustainable level, then why can't we have 27 players now available to Malky Mackay.
Seems a reasonable point to me.![]()
![]()
![]()
Cheers Gary, I honestly believe we will come unstuck unless they support Malky and help him Strengthen our squad![]()
Was this DJ's first season? When we sold everything and went on pre-season with less than 11 players and had an average squad all season?
I don't see any similarities at all.
Annis the last time we ran with a squad of 24 players we finished 12th. Says it all![]()
![]()
Fri Sep 30, 2011 7:51 pm

Fri Sep 30, 2011 8:09 pm
Fri Sep 30, 2011 8:17 pm
bluebird58 wrote:For goodness' sake - tomorrow is the 1st of October - there's plenty of time, and we're already doing well. There are no teams in this division significantly better than us at the moment.
Stop being so damned negative.
Annis, I respect your opinions, but you've got to start being more of a "glass half full" person!![]()
Oh - it should read "I would HAVE liked". For someone who has written so many books your grammar is appalling!
Fri Sep 30, 2011 8:27 pm
bluebird58 wrote:For goodness' sake - tomorrow is the 1st of October - there's plenty of time, and we're already doing well. There are no teams in this division significantly better than us at the moment.
Stop being so damned negative.
Annis, I respect your opinions, but you've got to start being more of a "glass half full" person!![]()
Oh - it should read "I would HAVE liked". For someone who has written so many books your grammar is appalling!
Fri Sep 30, 2011 9:32 pm
bluebird58 wrote:For goodness' sake - tomorrow is the 1st of October - there's plenty of time, and we're already doing well. There are no teams in this division significantly better than us at the moment.
Stop being so damned negative.
Annis, I respect your opinions, but you've got to start being more of a "glass half full" person!![]()
Oh - it should read "I would HAVE liked". For someone who has written so many books your grammar is appalling!
Fri Sep 30, 2011 10:37 pm
Fri Sep 30, 2011 11:21 pm
Fri Sep 30, 2011 11:29 pm
NJ73 wrote:I know this isn't a grammar or spelling test but can people please learn the difference between the word "of" and the word "have".![]()
It's not bloody hard and would make this site a lot more readable.
Fri Sep 30, 2011 11:30 pm
Nuclearblue wrote:NJ73 wrote:I know this isn't a grammar or spelling test but can people please learn the difference between the word "of" and the word "have".![]()
It's not bloody hard and would make this site a lot more readable.
We will Chief when you learn the difference between Girlfriend/Wife and Sister