Cardiff City Forum



A forum for all things Cardiff City

question to stan(qpr)

Fri Apr 29, 2011 11:36 am

stan what would your punishment be for any club found guilty of the alledged 7 offences qpr have been charged with . this is not saying qpr are guilty ,but lets pretend it is another championship team and they are found guilty on all 7 charges please. indicate your punishment for each individual offence. thanking you in anticipation of you responce

Re: question to stan(qpr)

Fri Apr 29, 2011 11:46 am

troobloo3339 wrote:stan what would your punishment be for any club found guilty of the alledged 7 offences qpr have been charged with . this is not saying qpr are guilty ,but lets pretend it is another championship team and they are found guilty on all 7 charges please. indicate your punishment for each individual offence. thanking you in anticipation of you responce

Now,that is a decent question and will be waiting for his reply

Re: question to stan(qpr)

Fri Apr 29, 2011 11:49 am

stan , mr warnock and everyone else would just say well done you deserved it :roll:

Re: question to stan(qpr)

Fri Apr 29, 2011 11:58 am

With all due respect how would I possibly know what the punishment would be?

I'm not a legal person, I'm not privy to the files on the case

I'm not in personal contact with someone sitting at the hearing.

In my OPINION & from what I've been told by close friends whom I trust is that we can answer every charge & that no deliberate intent was made to deceive. Whichever way the panel view this error is what will determine the punishment be it harsh or not.

I'm not possibly in a position to answer that as you probably well know.

Re: question to stan(qpr)

Fri Apr 29, 2011 12:16 pm

troobloo3339 wrote:stan what would your punishment be for any club found guilty of the alledged 7 offences qpr have been charged with . this is not saying qpr are guilty ,but lets pretend it is another championship team and they are found guilty on all 7 charges please. indicate your punishment for each individual offence. thanking you in anticipation of you responce


In all fairness that is a bit of a silly question - as only the IRC will be able to determine if QPR are guilty of any of the 7 charges brought upon them and only they will issue the sanctions against the club.

I have read the FA rules and regs. again and can only see any note of an appeal process span of 4 days - appeal to be in by 12 noon on the fourth day after the IRC's final decision. the FA/IRC will then have 2 full days to respond with their appeal outcome,(there are clauses on appealing against an IRC ruling though - usually their decision is final) thus leaving enough time for the PLAYOFF's to continue as normal from the date the FA has set in stone! (apparently they will NOT budge on playoff's and they will go ahead as normal!)

Re: question to stan(qpr)

Fri Apr 29, 2011 12:17 pm

i did not ask you to judge any guilt ,i asked you to assume guilt, you dont need to waffle on about being privy to papers or noing about goings on ,just be honest with us and your self and answer the original question ,or are you in denial, becouse you know your answer would be horrendous to contemplate should qpr be found guilty, time to stop buring your head in the sand , i personally think your putting on a brave face but privatly shitting your self ,becouse you know if qpr are found guilty its more than likely a huge points deduction , and another year in the championship (at least you would be one of the best teams in it) stan my wish is we get to finish 2nd and qpr are found not guilty of all 7 charges but in the real world who knows :ayatollah: :ayatollah: :ayatollah: :ayatollah: :ayatollah: :ayatollah: :ayatollah: :ayatollah: :ayatollah: :ayatollah: :ayatollah: :ayatollah: :old:

Re: question to stan(qpr)

Fri Apr 29, 2011 12:26 pm

As Merlin said its a silly question.

Say what you like about this that the other it doesn't interest me. All that does interest me is that we sit top of the league.

And it feeeeels good :lol:

Re: question to stan(qpr)

Fri Apr 29, 2011 12:29 pm

Stan-QPR wrote:With all due respect how would I possibly know what the punishment would be?

I'm not a legal person, I'm not privy to the files on the case

I'm not in personal contact with someone sitting at the hearing.

In my OPINION & from what I've been told by close friends whom I trust is that we can answer every charge & that no deliberate intent was made to deceive. Whichever way the panel view this error is what will determine the punishment be it harsh or not.

I'm not possibly in a position to answer that as you probably well know.




Stan, with respect, you're having a laugh here....it was YOU that stated YOU KNEW SOMEONE 'IN THE KNOW' and that it would be JUST A FINE, albeit a heavy one!!

Make your mind up, son....!!


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: question to stan(qpr)

Fri Apr 29, 2011 12:30 pm

Stan-QPR wrote:As Merlin said its a silly question.

Say what you like about this that the other it doesn't interest me. All that does interest me is that we sit top of the league.

And it feeeeels good :lol:


I still don't think you'll be there much longer.

Yes - I may be wrong, but I can't see how QPR can escape this one sorry pal.

I really want us to finish 2nd (for more than 1 reason!) and QPR to win the league and we go up together, but I just feel there's no way for QPR to get away with it. Play-Off's (which you will win anyway!) if you're lucky! :ayatollah:

Re: question to stan(qpr)

Fri Apr 29, 2011 12:31 pm

Stan-QPR wrote:As Merlin said its a silly question.

Say what you like about this that the other it doesn't interest me. All that does interest me is that we sit top of the league.

And it feeeeels good :lol:



Enjoy it, while your there, it may not be for long :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: question to stan(qpr)

Fri Apr 29, 2011 12:39 pm

i think we can all see you dont want to answer the original question ,becouse you dont like the answer, bit like saying no comment when being question by old bill ,it just leaves you looking like you got something to hide, the original question in not silly as it does not say qpr have been found guilty , , it says if any club was found guilty , the only silly thing is you stan for avoiding the question , what you got to hide :ayatollah: :ayatollah: :ayatollah: :ayatollah: :ayatollah: :ayatollah: :ayatollah: :ayatollah: :ayatollah: :ayatollah: :ayatollah: :ayatollah: :ayatollah: :ayatollah: :ayatollah: :old:

Re: question to stan(qpr)

Fri Apr 29, 2011 2:22 pm

just brought it back up incase of any confusion

Re: question to stan(qpr)

Fri Apr 29, 2011 2:26 pm

hate QPR

:ayatollah: :ayatollah: :ayatollah: :ayatollah: :ayatollah: :ayatollah: :ayatollah:

Re: question to stan(qpr)

Fri Apr 29, 2011 2:35 pm

Stan I hate to say it but two league clubs were docked 10 points and 3 points respectively for just failing to register a player in time, the FA said that although it was a mistake they still docked them the points

Re: question to stan(qpr)

Fri Apr 29, 2011 2:38 pm

Colin Wanker will know these rules inside out from the season he spent hounding West Ham, the fact he's gone to a QC seeking advice shows he's very nervous

Re: question to stan(qpr)

Fri Apr 29, 2011 2:45 pm

Troobloo it is a silly question because how do you expect someone to answer a question when they know nothing about it?

I don't know what QPR are actually supposed to have done wrong with regards to this paperwork. If I knew the ins & outs of it yea maybe I could give you my view but I don't so I can't.

If it turns out we've blatantly tried to bullshit the fa with false paperwork we deserve all we get but I've been told that's not the case & it was merely a mix up, hence why we've gone not guilty.

Our owners are some of the richest most successful on the planet they are not daft do you think we'd go through a hearing if we were bang to rights?

I'd say no.

Re: question to stan(qpr)

Fri Apr 29, 2011 6:03 pm

the question did not say qpr are guilty of anything it could be any club whats your thoughts on what the punishment should be its not that dificult surly

Re: question to stan(qpr)

Fri Apr 29, 2011 6:05 pm

troobloo3339 wrote:the question did not say qpr are guilty of anything it could be any club whats your thoughts on what the punishment should be its not that dificult surly


well as a QPR fan he wouldnt be thinking bout the clubs punishments he'd be hoping for promotion. I wouldnt answer if we were in their shoes.

Re: question to stan(qpr)

Fri Apr 29, 2011 6:11 pm

then just say i want answer that question and i want ask it again and draw my own conclusions why