Sat Mar 05, 2011 9:02 pm
Sat Mar 05, 2011 9:05 pm
Sat Mar 05, 2011 9:06 pm
Sat Mar 05, 2011 9:07 pm
Sat Mar 05, 2011 9:17 pm
Sat Mar 05, 2011 9:18 pm
Sat Mar 05, 2011 9:22 pm
Sat Mar 05, 2011 9:23 pm
Tony Blue Williams wrote:We saw the classic problem with Steve McPhail today (& also to a lesser extent Whittingham) in that he flatters to deceive in midfield. Yes in the first half he looked half decent as no-one was closing him down and he had time to think and act.
However, Paul Jewell must have given instructions for his players to close him down in the second half and as a result he faded without a trace.
The brutal truth is McPhail lacks some of the basic skills to be a top class player in that position in this league. He is slow in body and mind, he can't tackle, gives away too many free-kicks, he can't score and has absolutely no right foot.
I would finish by making a comparison between him and Jimmy Bullard, who when called upon produced the goods, even if up until then you hadn't really noticed him in the game.
Which would you prefer?
Sat Mar 05, 2011 9:28 pm
Sat Mar 05, 2011 9:29 pm
Sat Mar 05, 2011 9:32 pm
Lawnmower wrote:Tony Blue Williams wrote:We saw the classic problem with Steve McPhail today (& also to a lesser extent Whittingham) in that he flatters to deceive in midfield. Yes in the first half he looked half decent as no-one was closing him down and he had time to think and act.
However, Paul Jewell must have given instructions for his players to close him down in the second half and as a result he faded without a trace.
The brutal truth is McPhail lacks some of the basic skills to be a top class player in that position in this league. He is slow in body and mind, he can't tackle, gives away too many free-kicks, he can't score and has absolutely no right foot.
I would finish by making a comparison between him and Jimmy Bullard, who when called upon produced the goods, even if up until then you hadn't really noticed him in the game.
Which would you prefer?
McPhail was superb first half. He played one ball whcih was absolutely world class to put JET in.
Not his fault our much vaunted strike force couldnt put the ball away.
He tired in the last 20, but hardly suprising given he's not played much recently.
As for blaming Hudson for the goal, then I bet he's really sorry he didnt manage to put one of our strikers through on goal with his tackle.![]()
Defense did well today, up until they scored they created next to nothing.
We were denied, by a good keeper, a close offside decision, poor finishing, and a huge dollop of bad luck.
Tactics can be criticised and so can the subs.
Sat Mar 05, 2011 9:34 pm
Sat Mar 05, 2011 9:38 pm
Sat Mar 05, 2011 9:44 pm
Tony Blue Williams wrote:Lawnmower wrote:Tony Blue Williams wrote:We saw the classic problem with Steve McPhail today (& also to a lesser extent Whittingham) in that he flatters to deceive in midfield. Yes in the first half he looked half decent as no-one was closing him down and he had time to think and act.
However, Paul Jewell must have given instructions for his players to close him down in the second half and as a result he faded without a trace.
The brutal truth is McPhail lacks some of the basic skills to be a top class player in that position in this league. He is slow in body and mind, he can't tackle, gives away too many free-kicks, he can't score and has absolutely no right foot.
I would finish by making a comparison between him and Jimmy Bullard, who when called upon produced the goods, even if up until then you hadn't really noticed him in the game.
Which would you prefer?
McPhail was superb first half. He played one ball whcih was absolutely world class to put JET in.
Not his fault our much vaunted strike force couldnt put the ball away.
He tired in the last 20, but hardly suprising given he's not played much recently.
As for blaming Hudson for the goal, then I bet he's really sorry he didnt manage to put one of our strikers through on goal with his tackle.![]()
Defense did well today, up until they scored they created next to nothing.
We were denied, by a good keeper, a close offside decision, poor finishing, and a huge dollop of bad luck.
Tactics can be criticised and so can the subs.
Odd I don't remember blaming Hudson for the goal![]()
Sorry Tim but you are viewing McPhail through rose tinted glasses, we have been here before season after season in that once he is closed down he doesn't have the basic tools to get the job done. That is the reason for the difference between the first and second half performances, not tiredness.
You can bet every scouting report for every team we play between now and the end of the season will say the same.
Sat Mar 05, 2011 9:48 pm
Lawnmower wrote:No you didnt, the OP did and that was what i was posting about.
As for McPhail, no, I dont agree, I could see him tiring. First 60 minutes he was class. they TRIED to close him down, but failed, he ran out of steam and Jones should have changed tack.
Sat Mar 05, 2011 10:48 pm
Damned Yank wrote:As I predicted, viewtopic.php?f=2&t=38365, we lost the midfield battle and were outmuscled. With McPhail in the middle we aren't good enough. Simple.
The first goal killed us. Hudson wins the ball but then lets Scotland get the ball back off him.
Depressing.![]()
![]()
Missed opportunity to get back to second and I now believe it will be playoffs again. These games against mediocre opposition at home are MUST WINS if we wanna go up automatically.
What do you think? Playoffs or auto?
Tony Blue Williams wrote:Lawnmower wrote:No you didnt, the OP did and that was what i was posting about.
As for McPhail, no, I dont agree, I could see him tiring. First 60 minutes he was class. they TRIED to close him down, but failed, he ran out of steam and Jones should have changed tack.
Well I certainly viewed it differently and I also remember the last 2 seasons where he has returned to the side late in the season after being out for various reasons only to completely screw things up (i.e. we are still a Championship side)
So we will have to agree to disagree, but I hope to heavens another option can be found and quick.