Disgrace

If the rumours about Bellamy being arrested are true, and he really was reacting out of self defence than why is he on bail?

Now I'm expecting that most of this boards members have once been jumped, I've been jumped, completly out of the blue, last year at the age of just 14 by some pricks in a peugout! Now if I had been given the chance there is nothing I would've loved to do more than jaw the horrid vermin c*nts, I wasn't given a chance, I was taken from behind (No sexual pun intented) by a 20 year old,
Bellamy was given the chance to fight back and he took it, and I'm glad he did. I was traumatised after my experience, I know that the boys who jumped me are out there untouched.

Bellamy is a ledgend, not what he's been bandied around here lately (Cock, scum etc)

Bellamy is also a footballer, footballers arent allowed to be normal otherwise the press will give them hell aswell as the police

he reacted to being provoked so lets see what happens. chippy ally has loads of cameras.

Bellamy is also a footballer, footballers arent allowed to be normal otherwise the press will give them hell aswell as the police

Press are completly out of order!
When my sister had 4 tooth knocked out by a group of boys for her phone the cops didnt want to know
One of the boys' mother was a policewomen, convienient ayy!

That's good news mate, hope it comes out to be true! We need bellers at the helm.

The police are corrupt, Britain is corrupt even thought it may not seem it, I wouldnt be suprised if they rigged the election to get the money grabbing twats known as tories in power, oh yea and those slimey cowardly lib dems

Rant over

According to the WalesOnline report the 2 other men sufferred facial injuries.

Whilst Bellamy may have acted initally with the intention of self-defence, if it appears he used more than reasonable force then under the law he would have committed a criminal offence of assault with actual bodily harm.

I would assume that is why he has been bailed so that the Police can make further enquiries into how much force was used.

The police would know all about "necessary" force

According to the WalesOnline report the 2 other men sufferred facial injuries.

Whilst Bellamy may have acted initally with the intention of self-defence, if it appears he used more than reasonable force then under the law he would have committed a criminal offence of assault with actual bodily harm.

I would assume that is why he has been bailed so that the Police can make further enquiries into how much force was used.

Why should there be a limit to the force used? If Craig didn't fight back what limit of pain would of he been aloud to have gone through?

The police would know all about "necessary" force

Actually it would be the CPS and then a court. But I take your point, if you are attacked how can someone else really judge how fear of the situation affects your response?

The police would know all about "necessary" force

According to the WalesOnline report the 2 other men sufferred facial injuries.

Whilst Bellamy may have acted initally with the intention of self-defence, if it appears he used more than reasonable force then under the law he would have committed a criminal offence of assault with actual bodily harm.

I would assume that is why he has been bailed so that the Police can make further enquiries into how much force was used.

Why should there be a limit to the force used? If Craig didn't fight back what limit of pain would of he been aloud to have gone through?

I'm not totally against your point of view, but if for example during an argument you pushed someone away and they then responded by shoving a broken bottle into your face, would that be proportionate self-defence or GBH?

Everyone has the right to defend themselves but it is not an opportunity to inflict revenge. That said once you have been assaulted it is hard to stay calm and if the assailant comes off slightly worse for wear, then I say good.

According to the WalesOnline report the 2 other men sufferred facial injuries.

Whilst Bellamy may have acted initally with the intention of self-defence, if it appears he used more than reasonable force then under the law he would have committed a criminal offence of assault with actual bodily harm.

I would assume that is why he has been bailed so that the Police can make further enquiries into how much force was used.

Why should there be a limit to the force used? If Craig didn't fight back what limit of pain would of he been aloud to have gone through?

I'm not totally against your point of view, but if for example during an argument you pushed someone away and they then responded by shoving a broken bottle into your face, would that be proportionate self-defence or GBH?

Everyone has the right to defend themselves but it is not an opportunity to inflict revenge. That said once you have been assaulted it is hard to stay calm and if the assailant comes off slightly worse for wear, then I say good.

Tony fella I see what you mean bout would it revenge or self defence, but human instincts usually says "keep me alive" and which may make you "instinctly" use any force necessary in self-defence. On the other hand there are some real bellends wholook for trouble.

Tony fella I see what you mean bout would it revenge or self defence, but human instincts usually says "keep me alive" and which may make you "instinctly" use any force necessary in self-defence. On the other hand there are some real bellends wholook for trouble.

Actually that was the point I was trying to make

Legends do something good for the club.....Bellamy missed a one on one with the jack goalkeeper....he owes us now

Legends do something good for the club.....Bellamy missed a one on one with the jack goalkeeper....he owes us now

Well Eddie's a ledgend... He owes us about 20 goals