Wikipedia - Vincent Tan

A long while back Just before Ridsdale was pushed out, Wikipedia accepted my edit (Which anyone can do to any profile) although it is vetted first before allowed to remain on the site.

The last paragraph on this Vincent Tan section was produced by ME!

So i'd just like to share that with you as I have seen many threads referring to people seeing some crazy rumours going onto wiki!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vincent_Tan

And there's me thinking 'Wikipedia' was a FACTUAL encyclopedia....

You didn't even mention 83.2% of the 'demonstrators' were under the age of 15 and/or Ridsdale didn't see it....!!

Hmmm....

Wikipedia edit's aren't "vetted".

It relies upon people correcting the bullshit some people write.

Ok, it's not an encyclopedia by any score, but why some people think it's ok to post bs, I don't know...

Wikipedia edit's aren't "vetted".

It relies upon people correcting the bullshit some people write.

Ok, it's not an encyclopedia by any score, but why some people think it's ok to post bs, I don't know...

It contains less bullshit than some of your AAMB message board threads though huh?

Wikipedia edit's aren't "vetted".

It relies upon people correcting the bullshit some people write.

Ok, it's not an encyclopedia by any score, but why some people think it's ok to post bs, I don't know...

It contains less bullshit than some of your AAMB message board threads though huh?

You're aware I wasn't referring to your edit as being bullshit, right?

I was referring to the general process on wikipedia...

No need to be touchy.

And if you wanted some advice, your addition doesn't comply to wikipedia standards. You've added opinion plus there are no reliable sources to your points...

get a room you 2