Would you settle for Langstone being paid

as opposed to signing any players this month ?

as opposed to signing any players this month ?

if we do spend i suppose langstone be bit naffed off we not making movement to pay them

if i was langstone i be fuming lol

I would like the club to be debt free i suppose,but gutted we couldnt get any1 in.

as opposed to signing any players this month ?

Investing in the team is cheaper than paying off the debt which worryingly gives me the impression it could still be a short term gamble by the Malaysians.

as opposed to signing any players this month ?

if we do spend i suppose langstone be bit naffed off we not making movement to pay them

if i was langstone i be fuming lol

I suppose another way of looking at it is that Sam has a lot better chance of getting his money back if we go up.

as opposed to signing any players this month ?

if we do spend i suppose langstone be bit naffed off we not making movement to pay them

if i was langstone i be fuming lol

I suppose another way of looking at it is that Sam has a lot better chance of getting his money back if we go up.

yea very true

the obvious choice is that i would prefer the team to be strenthened, cos what ever happens to the langston debt, we will still owe the money, to the malasians or sam hammam or whoever, at least we get to see some new players if they invest in the team.
i do feel for sam hammam though, he has been very patient and understanding and i got a funny feeling hes going to get screwed over by the ruthless malaysians