Thu Dec 23, 2010 12:44 pm
Thu Dec 23, 2010 1:49 pm
Cefnfforestbluebird wrote:Reading in the Echo it emerges that the people arrested in Cardiff were planning to blow up Bridgend retail shopping centre on the edge of town and shopping precints in Cardiff, Old bill have found documents in the raided houses and apparantly had warned their families not to visit these areas due to tip off s prior to the arrests.
Thu Dec 23, 2010 2:07 pm
Thu Dec 23, 2010 3:25 pm
Cefnfforestbluebird wrote:Reading in the Echo it emerges that the people arrested in Cardiff were planning to blow up Bridgend retail shopping centre on the edge of town and shopping precints in Cardiff, Old bill have found documents in the raided houses and apparantly had warned their families not to visit these areas due to tip off s prior to the arrests.
Thu Dec 23, 2010 3:41 pm
Thu Dec 23, 2010 3:44 pm
Thu Dec 23, 2010 3:57 pm
Thu Dec 23, 2010 6:15 pm
Cefnfforestbluebird wrote:Reading in the Echo it emerges that the people arrested in Cardiff were planning to blow up Bridgend retail shopping centre on the edge of town and shopping precints in Cardiff, Old bill have found documents in the raided houses and apparantly had warned their families not to visit these areas due to tip off s prior to the arrests.
Thu Dec 23, 2010 6:24 pm
Thu Dec 23, 2010 6:26 pm
Thu Dec 23, 2010 9:42 pm
Thu Dec 23, 2010 9:44 pm
Thu Dec 23, 2010 9:53 pm
Thu Dec 23, 2010 9:58 pm
Nuclearblue wrote:It is the way you look at it. If you had pictures of landmarks which you do joncandy no one would think any thing different. If some OAP had a picture of the Queen then she aint planning to assassinate her is she. But if a group of Muslims with a load of bomb making equipment and had photos of say ST Davids centre then you could safely say it would be a good shout they were planning a attack it. Same could be said if there was a load of Paddies and they had pictures of say MPs or The Queen and certain landmarks or shopping centres then it could be very suspicious. But if they had explosives then you can put 2 & 2 together.
As i have said before i dont do PC shit.
Thu Dec 23, 2010 10:02 pm
Thu Dec 23, 2010 10:04 pm
Thu Dec 23, 2010 10:07 pm
cardiffray wrote:how do you know they didnt have bomb making equipment>? were you in on the raids?
Thu Dec 23, 2010 10:08 pm
joncandy wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:It is the way you look at it. If you had pictures of landmarks which you do joncandy no one would think any thing different. If some OAP had a picture of the Queen then she aint planning to assassinate her is she. But if a group of Muslims with a load of bomb making equipment and had photos of say ST Davids centre then you could safely say it would be a good shout they were planning a attack it. Same could be said if there was a load of Paddies and they had pictures of say MPs or The Queen and certain landmarks or shopping centres then it could be very suspicious. But if they had explosives then you can put 2 & 2 together.
As i have said before i dont do PC shit.
True, but they didn't have bomb making equipment did they?
Innocent until proven guilty in my eyes, people were quick to complain about train woman and the assumption the media were making about a bunch of football fans, in my eyes this is the same, just because they are a bunch of muslims does not make them terroists until they are charged!
Thu Dec 23, 2010 10:14 pm
Xcasual wrote:That's right,bury your head in the sandHow come the ob aren't smashing all the Muslims doors in ? Wake up !!
Thu Dec 23, 2010 10:56 pm
joncandy wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:It is the way you look at it. If you had pictures of landmarks which you do joncandy no one would think any thing different. If some OAP had a picture of the Queen then she aint planning to assassinate her is she. But if a group of Muslims with a load of bomb making equipment and had photos of say ST Davids centre then you could safely say it would be a good shout they were planning a attack it. Same could be said if there was a load of Paddies and they had pictures of say MPs or The Queen and certain landmarks or shopping centres then it could be very suspicious. But if they had explosives then you can put 2 & 2 together.
As i have said before i dont do PC shit.
True, but they didn't have bomb making equipment did they?
Innocent until proven guilty in my eyes, people were quick to complain about train woman and the assumption the media were making about a bunch of football fans, in my eyes this is the same, just because they are a bunch of muslims does not make them terroists until they are charged!
Thu Dec 23, 2010 11:12 pm
Thu Dec 23, 2010 11:17 pm
joncandy wrote:Nuclearblue wrote:It is the way you look at it. If you had pictures of landmarks which you do joncandy no one would think any thing different. If some OAP had a picture of the Queen then she aint planning to assassinate her is she. But if a group of Muslims with a load of bomb making equipment and had photos of say ST Davids centre then you could safely say it would be a good shout they were planning a attack it. Same could be said if there was a load of Paddies and they had pictures of say MPs or The Queen and certain landmarks or shopping centres then it could be very suspicious. But if they had explosives then you can put 2 & 2 together.
As i have said before i dont do PC shit.
True, but they didn't have bomb making equipment did they?
Innocent until proven guilty in my eyes, people were quick to complain about train woman and the assumption the media were making about a bunch of football fans, in my eyes this is the same, just because they are a bunch of muslims does not make them terroists until they are charged!
Fri Dec 24, 2010 12:23 am
Ben wrote:this is why we need to stand up! and do somthing about it
oppppppppppppppss
you can't do that or say anything because you'll be deemed racist
Fri Dec 24, 2010 8:15 am