Tue Nov 30, 2010 8:53 pm
Tue Nov 30, 2010 9:01 pm
Tue Nov 30, 2010 9:04 pm
Tue Nov 30, 2010 9:05 pm
Tue Nov 30, 2010 9:07 pm
Tue Nov 30, 2010 9:08 pm
NJ73 wrote:So are you going to keep having htis vote every couple of months until you get the answer you want?![]()
![]()
Just asking like
Tue Nov 30, 2010 9:23 pm
Tue Nov 30, 2010 9:26 pm
Tue Nov 30, 2010 9:26 pm
Claire wrote:PLEASE can someone who has voted NO explain why??? You are already a member to have been able to vote!!! It won't even effect you!!!!!
Any explanation would be greatly appreciated!
Tue Nov 30, 2010 9:33 pm
NJ73 wrote:Claire wrote:PLEASE can someone who has voted NO explain why??? You are already a member to have been able to vote!!! It won't even effect you!!!!!
Any explanation would be greatly appreciated!
Think of it like this....you're out shopping and all the shops are open for you to walk in and browse apart from one which insists you fill in a form before you can even look inside. Would you bother or would you just move on to the next shop?
Perhaps the members who have voted no see that by stopping non members viewing the board, it would mean they wouldn't bother with the site rather than enjoy the postings as a browser and eventually sign up.
Tue Nov 30, 2010 9:35 pm
Tue Nov 30, 2010 9:37 pm
Marc wrote:NJ73 wrote:Claire wrote:PLEASE can someone who has voted NO explain why??? You are already a member to have been able to vote!!! It won't even effect you!!!!!
Any explanation would be greatly appreciated!
Think of it like this....you're out shopping and all the shops are open for you to walk in and browse apart from one which insists you fill in a form before you can even look inside. Would you bother or would you just move on to the next shop?
Perhaps the members who have voted no see that by stopping non members viewing the board, it would mean they wouldn't bother with the site rather than enjoy the postings as a browser and eventually sign up.
I voted yes, but NJ73's analogy has to be the best I've heard in ages![]()
![]()
Are you a teacher by any chance NJ73??
Tue Nov 30, 2010 9:41 pm
Tue Nov 30, 2010 9:42 pm
ccfcninian wrote:I voted yes reason being more people may sign up to view Carl's exclusives.![]()
Tue Nov 30, 2010 9:43 pm
Tue Nov 30, 2010 9:45 pm
Tue Nov 30, 2010 9:49 pm
NJ73 wrote:Claire wrote:PLEASE can someone who has voted NO explain why??? You are already a member to have been able to vote!!! It won't even effect you!!!!!
Any explanation would be greatly appreciated!
Think of it like this....you're out shopping and all the shops are open for you to walk in and browse apart from one which insists you fill in a form before you can even look inside. Would you bother or would you just move on to the next shop?
Perhaps the members who have voted no see that by stopping non members viewing the board, it would mean they wouldn't bother with the site rather than enjoy the postings as a browser and eventually sign up.
Tue Nov 30, 2010 9:51 pm
Uncle Fester wrote:NJ73 wrote:Claire wrote:PLEASE can someone who has voted NO explain why??? You are already a member to have been able to vote!!! It won't even effect you!!!!!
Any explanation would be greatly appreciated!
Think of it like this....you're out shopping and all the shops are open for you to walk in and browse apart from one which insists you fill in a form before you can even look inside. Would you bother or would you just move on to the next shop?
Perhaps the members who have voted no see that by stopping non members viewing the board, it would mean they wouldn't bother with the site rather than enjoy the postings as a browser and eventually sign up.
If the inside of the said shop has better contents than others, then yes.![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Tue Nov 30, 2010 10:06 pm
Tue Nov 30, 2010 10:10 pm
Tue Nov 30, 2010 10:12 pm
NJ73 wrote:Claire wrote:PLEASE can someone who has voted NO explain why??? You are already a member to have been able to vote!!! It won't even effect you!!!!!
Any explanation would be greatly appreciated!
Think of it like this....you're out shopping and all the shops are open for you to walk in and browse apart from one which insists you fill in a form before you can even look inside. Would you bother or would you just move on to the next shop?
Perhaps the members who have voted no see that by stopping non members viewing the board, it would mean they wouldn't bother with the site rather than enjoy the postings as a browser and eventually sign up.
Tue Nov 30, 2010 10:15 pm
Claire wrote:PLEASE can someone who has voted NO explain why??? You are already a member to have been able to vote!!! It won't even effect you!!!!!
Any explanation would be greatly appreciated!
Tue Nov 30, 2010 10:19 pm
VCLEE wrote:Claire wrote:PLEASE can someone who has voted NO explain why??? You are already a member to have been able to vote!!! It won't even effect you!!!!!
Any explanation would be greatly appreciated!
Because nobody has explained the purpose! I thought this board was set up for ALL but in light of recent threads being 'locked' and the appearence of blatant misinformation there appears to be an element of running scared when under closer scrutiny/examination. This latest attempt suggests (at least to us sceptics) a case of 'putting up the shutters' which is never healthy.
Tue Nov 30, 2010 10:22 pm
Tue Nov 30, 2010 10:27 pm
GLASCOEDBLUE wrote:Signed up today after visiting this site nightly over many months. The threat of it becoming members only has made my decision to sign up to an excellent site. (Already a member of CCFC forum)
I voted no as I believe that it would become a closed shop and would not allow many city fans visit this site. It might be seen by many city fans as a breakway forum and I believe that this very important time for the club and all fans of Cardiff City to be as one for that push for the promised land.
Now I have started posting I will continue with topic's that might or might not be intresting, but one thing we will all agree on is CITY TILL I DIE![]()
![]()
Tue Nov 30, 2010 10:28 pm
Tue Nov 30, 2010 10:30 pm
VCLEE wrote:Claire wrote:PLEASE can someone who has voted NO explain why??? You are already a member to have been able to vote!!! It won't even effect you!!!!!
Any explanation would be greatly appreciated!
Because nobody has explained the purpose! I thought this board was set up for ALL but in light of recent threads being 'locked' and the appearence of blatant misinformation there appears to be an element of running scared when under closer scrutiny/examination. This latest attempt suggests (at least to us sceptics) a case of 'putting up the shutters' which is never healthy.
Tue Nov 30, 2010 10:37 pm
Tue Nov 30, 2010 10:43 pm
Claire wrote:PLEASE can someone who has voted NO explain why??? You are already a member to have been able to vote!!! It won't even effect you!!!!!
Any explanation would be greatly appreciated!
Tue Nov 30, 2010 11:21 pm