Wed Nov 24, 2010 10:55 pm
recharding wrote:...is the grammar.
I am genuinely interested in the views and news that come from the messages on this forum. However, I am finding that increasingly that some of the standards of spelling and grammar are embarrassing.
Some messages I actually can't understand.
I feel it brings down this otherwise excellent football message board.
Thu Nov 25, 2010 12:34 am
Thu Nov 25, 2010 2:32 am
Thu Nov 25, 2010 7:05 am
chippy909 wrote:Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch I hvae dnoe, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetant tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe.
Thu Nov 25, 2010 11:00 am
recharding wrote:...is the grammar.
I am genuinely interested in the views and news that come from the messages on this forum. However, I am finding that increasingly that some of the standards of spelling and grammar are embarrassing.
Some messages I actually can't understand.
I feel it brings down this otherwise excellent football message board.
Thu Nov 25, 2010 5:42 pm