Sun Nov 21, 2010 7:42 pm
Sun Nov 21, 2010 7:43 pm
TCM wrote:Hi All
I know this is probably going to get shot down in flames but this is a genuine query - I had a discussion with Carl and Annis yesterday about democracy and one question I have is if this board is democratic why are people banned?
Tracey
Sun Nov 21, 2010 7:45 pm
TCM wrote:Hi All
I know this is probably going to get shot down in flames but this is a genuine query - I had a discussion with Carl and Annis yesterday about democracy and one question I have is if this board is democratic why are people banned?
Tracey
Sun Nov 21, 2010 7:50 pm
Sun Nov 21, 2010 7:50 pm
joninian1927 wrote:TCM wrote:Hi All
I know this is probably going to get shot down in flames but this is a genuine query - I had a discussion with Carl and Annis yesterday about democracy and one question I have is if this board is democratic why are people banned?
Tracey
Good question. It initially looked as if this board was very open but lately thats changed a wee bit. dont take this as a criticism as it isnt. There are certain people on this board who have said some very nasty things and get away with it whilst others get banned a lot easier. Overall the moderators do a very difficult job excellently
Sun Nov 21, 2010 7:52 pm
Sun Nov 21, 2010 7:52 pm
Sun Nov 21, 2010 7:52 pm
BigGwynram wrote:A democracy like our country where we have to listen to the vitriol and war mongering from certain ethnic groups who are protected by democracy, people who should be deported, banned or at least jailed are protected by their democratic rights.Democracy, give me common sense any day of the week.
Sun Nov 21, 2010 7:53 pm
BigGwynram wrote:A democracy like our country where we have to listen to the vitriol and war mongering from certain ethnic groups who are protected by democracy, people who should be deported, banned or at least jailed are protected by their democratic rights.Democracy, give me common sense any day of the week.
Sun Nov 21, 2010 7:54 pm
Sun Nov 21, 2010 7:54 pm
Sun Nov 21, 2010 7:56 pm
joninian1927 wrote:bakedalasker, there have been instances where people have made outrageous comments and get away with it. Without naming any names, when Steve Borley had his drunken rant somebody called him a thief and said he was as bad as the riddler. for me that was inexcusable but this certain person always gets away with it. Other than a few isolated incidents, this board is well run and well marshalled.
Sun Nov 21, 2010 8:01 pm
TCM wrote:Hi All
I know this is probably going to get shot down in flames but this is a genuine query - I had a discussion with Carl and Annis yesterday about democracy and one question I have is if this board is democratic why are people banned?
Tracey
Sun Nov 21, 2010 8:04 pm
Sun Nov 21, 2010 8:08 pm
TCM wrote:I don't understand why people I know have been banned for simply giving viewpoints that differ to others? This isn't active participation?
Sun Nov 21, 2010 8:08 pm
Sun Nov 21, 2010 8:09 pm
castleblue wrote:TCM wrote:I don't understand why people I know have been banned for simply giving viewpoints that differ to others? This isn't active participation?
Active participation is subject to complying with the other 2 requirements, I don't know what was said but obviously the moderators opinion was that it was unacceptable.
Sun Nov 21, 2010 8:13 pm
steve davies wrote:["Lawnmower"]["BigGwynram"]A democracy like our country where we have to listen to the vitriol and war mongering from certain ethnic groups who are protected by democracy, people who should be deported, banned or at least jailed are protected by their democratic rights.Democracy, give me common sense any day of the week.
Who decides what common sense is if there is no democracy Gwyn ?
Yours may be different to every one elses.
Sun Nov 21, 2010 8:13 pm
Sun Nov 21, 2010 8:15 pm
Sun Nov 21, 2010 8:16 pm
Sun Nov 21, 2010 8:17 pm
TCM wrote:castleblue wrote:TCM wrote:I don't understand why people I know have been banned for simply giving viewpoints that differ to others? This isn't active participation?
Active participation is subject to complying with the other 2 requirements, I don't know what was said but obviously the moderators opinion was that it was unacceptable.
hmmmm...having another viewpoint?
Sun Nov 21, 2010 8:20 pm
Sun Nov 21, 2010 8:21 pm
Lawnmower wrote:I doubt you will find anyone on here who doesn't think that is wrong Steve.
Have the club banned them or the police ?
Sun Nov 21, 2010 8:24 pm
jamccfc wrote:Lawnmower wrote:I doubt you will find anyone on here who doesn't think that is wrong Steve.
Have the club banned them or the police ?
the police tim
Sun Nov 21, 2010 8:26 pm
Sun Nov 21, 2010 8:29 pm
Sun Nov 21, 2010 8:32 pm
The Ratcatcher wrote:You said on the other debate that the trust was ineffective. Make your mind up mate!
Sun Nov 21, 2010 8:37 pm
jamccfc wrote:the trust and the supporters club are official organisations so therefore have more clout than us. if they proclaim to be for the fans then they should take up this cause on our behalf.
Sun Nov 21, 2010 8:38 pm