razorboy wrote:Sludge has nailed it perfectly.
No amount of counter arguing is going to succeed in this matter. The far right always hijack tragic situations like this and use it for their own filthy agendas.
Is that what you call nailing something perfectly?
You have two people at the crime scene one lying on the floor with an obvious stab wound to his face and three other wounds not so obvious but the person on the floor is saying he's been stabbed four times, he's also claiming he can't breathe. Then you have the other person appearing unharmed with no obvious injuries standing over the prone person claiming that his turban was knocked off his head and he'd been racially verbally abused by the prone person on the floor.
My first thoughts would be that obviously the person on the floor had been assaulted using a bladed article (face injury) and almost certainly the person standing above him was the one who had committed the attack.
Any normal person would come to that conclusion as in say if it was a drink related altercation, people would almost certainly come to the conclusion that they had a disagreement and one man had used a bladed article (which we all know is a serious offence) and the other was a victim of that attack.. pretty obvious isn't it?
So why would the police disbelieve the man on the floor? What would make them disbelieve something so obvious?
My take on it is that the police have been trained to put racial accusations as more important than anything else..maybe worth a read of their policy on policing so called racial accusations. This govt is pushing the narrative and the upper echelons of the police (amongst many other organisations) are involved in this woke nonsense.. mostly Fabian based.
The man was dying as it was then the police probably accelerated that outcome by handcuffing him and dragging his dying body across the gravel.
Surely you I and any sane person would refrain from handcuffing someone whose obviously in serious difficulties with very bad injuries and is incapable of being a problem or nuisance to them and maybe handcuffing the person standing over the prone person would be more appropriate.
Big call out to Sludge for his enlightening contributions to this debate.