
worcester_ccfc wrote:I thought they had an obligation to buy him?
I can't see him being wanted by us anyway, would be surprised if he's even with us for pre-season.
Starvinmarvin wrote:Was it a wage issue or did BBM not fancy him? As far as a bruiser center half goes I don't see BBM going for that he wants everyone including the keeper to be able to play

“We will dust ourselves down and go again”

Bluebird1977 wrote:Starvinmarvin wrote:Was it a wage issue or did BBM not fancy him? As far as a bruiser center half goes I don't see BBM going for that he wants everyone including the keeper to be able to play
When BBM come here he was asked about daaland and he was already on the way out due to wages I assume he got asked the question and BBM said "I've no idea what's going on with him" ive remember the interview, so that told me the club moved him on without the manager even having a look which didn't suprise me at the time. That's how I remember it.

JJ1927 wrote:Unfortunately it could make the sale of Lawlor more likely if we cant get him off our wage bill as he could be seen by Tan and his ilk as Lawlors replacement.

worcester_ccfc wrote:JJ1927 wrote:Unfortunately it could make the sale of Lawlor more likely if we cant get him off our wage bill as he could be seen by Tan and his ilk as Lawlors replacement.
Don't think it makes any difference personally.
If a big bid comes in for Lawlor then it would be difficult for any club to turn down. I don't think Daland comes into that conversation because I expect Daland will be gone before pre-season.
I certainly don't expect Lawlor to be sold cheap. One thing we know about Tan is he always tries to get as much money as possible from any situation.
Users browsing this forum: Amazonbot [Bot], Bytespider [Bot], Facebook [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], ias [Bot], Meta [bot], Petal [Bot], Proximic [Bot], Semrush [Bot], Tiktok [Bot] and 159 guests