Monty, What I am finding by the usual Suspects, that the ma

Monty,

What I am finding by the usual Suspects, that the majority are not allowed to be Upset by a bad performance or result.
We are not allowed our opinion or view if it’s not saying BBM got it right even if he 100% Never.

We are Passionate and emotional and put our feelings out.

Imagine if we had continued to say Riza / Bulut were doing a great Job.

I think it's perfectly acceptable to voice concerns we are having a slight wobble at the worse time possible,

As long as we are all behind the lads for 90 minutes during the game I don't see a problem with constructive criticism and a difference of opinions in between matches

I think it's perfectly acceptable to voice concerns we are having a slight wobble at the worse time possible,

As long as we are all behind the lads for 90 minutes during the game I don't see a problem with constructive criticism and a difference of opinions in between matches

Absolutely Spot on.

But a couple on here shoot you down and make out we are virtually not Supporting City, We give Praise when it’s Deserved and should be allowed to give Criticism when we are not doing well.

I have done that all my life, BUT NEVER EVER STOPPED SUPPORTING MY CLUB

It's a forum ffs I respect there views are different to mine but we don' t need to be hassled for a different opinion debating is one think hassling someone for a different view is not right

it's like the loony left if you don' t like there woke agenda they resort to hassling someone

my view is we should have got another striker in or at least I would have liked a striker in,
I new salec was a long term injury I have been there with a neck injury myself.

And if murphy was offered a 15 million war chest he would have refused it" give me a break".

It's a forum ffs I respect there views are different to mine but we don' t need to be hassled for a different opinion debating is one think hassling someone for a different view is not right

it's like the loony left if you don' t like there woke agenda they resort to hassling someone

my view is we should have got another striker in or at least I would have liked a striker in,
I new salec was a long term injury I have been there with a neck injury myself.

And if murphy was offered a 15 million war chest he would have refused it" give me a break".

Exactly Monty, it’s a Football Forum.

REMEMBER RIZA COULD DI NO WRONG BUT TURNED OUT TO BE ONE OF OUR WORST MANAGERS OF ALL TIME.


BBM is making mistakes and costly, but he’s still leading and we have achieved Nothing yet.
We should have Strengthened in January.

Players are Tired / Injured Non Stop and Suspensions.

But BBM Wanted a SMALL Squad.

I agree, seeing the same from the usual suspects.

You know, the ones who are never on here when things are going well but come out of hiding after a bad result. Sadly they can never admit they were wrong, I and others have about previous players/managers.

They should be over the moon, because they said we'd be nowhere near top six. Never mind top two.

I'll judge the manager on the last 36 games, not the last 2.

And as for it being a football forum. Yeah it is and that's why I'll passionately defend my viewpoint as they do their's.

If we don't get top two then those who said we needed a striker will be right.

But if we do, those of us who said we didn't will be right.

Let's see what's what then.

I said on another thread that there is nothing wrong with having a negative view on our performance if we have played badly and dropped points

There isn't a club out there that has fans with a positive view all the way through the season

Look at Birmingham a lot of them want their manager gone even Wrexham fans were calling for Phil parkinsons head earlier in the season
Yet I don't think I've seen one person call for BBMs head on here

What I don't like though is the fact that there is a whole thread dedicated to slamming Tanner

I agree, seeing the same from the usual suspects.

You know, the ones who are never on here when things are going well but come out of hiding after a bad result. Sadly they can never admit they were wrong, I and others have about previous players/managers.

They should be over the moon, because they said we'd be nowhere near top six. Never mind top two.

I'll judge the manager on the last 36 games, not the last 2.

And as for it being a football forum. Yeah it is and that's why I'll passionately defend my viewpoint as they do their's.

If we don't get top two then those who said we needed a striker will be right.

But if we do, those of us who said we didn't will be right.

Let's see what's what then.

This.

Monty is actually the epitome of the loony left in that he shouts the odds (Valley comment) and cries when he gets it back.

It’s a football forum. If you put out negativity be prepared to be called out by those more positive. It’s not stating you can’t it’s stating the reasons you shouldn’t. It’s called debate.

I just think that a lot of our supporters are under 40.. so not really used to the bad times.. and loose their heads when things go not to plan.
It’s all about opinions I guess, everyone entitled to one and should not be ridiculed if theirs differ.
What we need now is not to panic, it’s the run in.. we are going to lose a game, but I believe we will finish the job.
We got to this position by the way we have played.. let’s keep it going..
Coventry are 9 points clear of 3rd.. do you see their fans panicking?
I am looking forward to the next 10 games, it’s all part and parcel of the game.

We all see things differently through a different lens, the most important thing is respect other peoples opinions whether you agree or not and just be Fu@k#&g kind to each other

Football has always been about opinions. I have been on this message board for many years and love the debate (well done Annis). It only goes wrong when people get personal which is normally quashed quite quickly.
I am sure I am no different to any other bluebird and feel the highs and lows deeply related to each match outcome. It is the after match emotion that drives some of the comments. It is ok to vent on here as long as it isn't personal.
We all support Cardiff City and should be used to it. It has been an amazing season and so refreshing compered to the last few. We are wobbling but we surely never believed it would be any easy run in.
Like many I believe we will get promoted. It then will turn to any related investment which wil drive the debate but we know it will not change unless Tan goes.

Keep the faith, we are in a great position that I would of grabbed if offered it at the beginning of the season

I agree, seeing the same from the usual suspects.

You know, the ones who are never on here when things are going well but come out of hiding after a bad result. Sadly they can never admit they were wrong, I and others have about previous players/managers.

They should be over the moon, because they said we'd be nowhere near top six. Never mind top two.

I'll judge the manager on the last 36 games, not the last 2.

And as for it being a football forum. Yeah it is and that's why I'll passionately defend my viewpoint as they do their's.

If we don't get top two then those who said we needed a striker will be right.

But if we do, those of us who said we didn't will be right.

Let's see what's what then.

This.

Monty is actually the epitome of the loony left in that he shouts the odds (Valley comment) and cries when he gets it back.

It’s a football forum. If you put out negativity be prepared to be called out by those more positive. It’s not stating you can’t it’s stating the reasons you shouldn’t. It’s called debate.

What odds have I shouted? You just like arguing end of anyone one who you deem negative your on them like a rash that's just shouting people down and I am not negative all the time I was there saturday waving my flag and cheering us on.

I agree, seeing the same from the usual suspects.

You know, the ones who are never on here when things are going well but come out of hiding after a bad result. Sadly they can never admit they were wrong, I and others have about previous players/managers.

They should be over the moon, because they said we'd be nowhere near top six. Never mind top two.

I'll judge the manager on the last 36 games, not the last 2.

And as for it being a football forum. Yeah it is and that's why I'll passionately defend my viewpoint as they do their's.

If we don't get top two then those who said we needed a striker will be right.

But if we do, those of us who said we didn't will be right.

Let's see what's what then.

This.

Monty is actually the epitome of the loony left in that he shouts the odds (Valley comment) and cries when he gets it back.

It’s a football forum. If you put out negativity be prepared to be called out by those more positive. It’s not stating you can’t it’s stating the reasons you shouldn’t. It’s called debate.

What odds have I shouted? You just like arguing end of anyone one who you deem negative your on them like a rash that's just shouting people down and I am not negative all the time I was there saturday waving my flag and cheering us on.

The valleys comment you had to apologise for.

I’m not shouting people down. I’m debating on a football forum.

I agree, seeing the same from the usual suspects.

You know, the ones who are never on here when things are going well but come out of hiding after a bad result. Sadly they can never admit they were wrong, I and others have about previous players/managers.

They should be over the moon, because they said we'd be nowhere near top six. Never mind top two.

I'll judge the manager on the last 36 games, not the last 2.

And as for it being a football forum. Yeah it is and that's why I'll passionately defend my viewpoint as they do their's.

If we don't get top two then those who said we needed a striker will be right.

But if we do, those of us who said we didn't will be right.

Let's see what's what then.

This.

Monty is actually the epitome of the loony left in that he shouts the odds (Valley comment) and cries when he gets it back.

It’s a football forum. If you put out negativity be prepared to be called out by those more positive. It’s not stating you can’t it’s stating the reasons you shouldn’t. It’s called debate.

You owe a big apologie to Monty,

Who the f**k are you to Say something like that???

I agree, seeing the same from the usual suspects.

You know, the ones who are never on here when things are going well but come out of hiding after a bad result. Sadly they can never admit they were wrong, I and others have about previous players/managers.

They should be over the moon, because they said we'd be nowhere near top six. Never mind top two.

I'll judge the manager on the last 36 games, not the last 2.

And as for it being a football forum. Yeah it is and that's why I'll passionately defend my viewpoint as they do their's.

If we don't get top two then those who said we needed a striker will be right.

But if we do, those of us who said we didn't will be right.

Let's see what's what then.

This.

Monty is actually the epitome of the loony left in that he shouts the odds (Valley comment) and cries when he gets it back.

It’s a football forum. If you put out negativity be prepared to be called out by those more positive. It’s not stating you can’t it’s stating the reasons you shouldn’t. It’s called debate.

What odds have I shouted? You just like arguing end of anyone one who you deem negative your on them like a rash that's just shouting people down and I am not negative all the time I was there saturday waving my flag and cheering us on.

The valleys comment you had to apologise for.

I’m not shouting people down. I’m debating on a football forum.

You have said there if your negative be prepared to be called out, why? I said in the earlier comment there is a difference with hassling someone and debating.

I agree, seeing the same from the usual suspects.

You know, the ones who are never on here when things are going well but come out of hiding after a bad result. Sadly they can never admit they were wrong, I and others have about previous players/managers.

They should be over the moon, because they said we'd be nowhere near top six. Never mind top two.

I'll judge the manager on the last 36 games, not the last 2.

And as for it being a football forum. Yeah it is and that's why I'll passionately defend my viewpoint as they do their's.

If we don't get top two then those who said we needed a striker will be right.

But if we do, those of us who said we didn't will be right.

Let's see what's what then.

This.

Monty is actually the epitome of the loony left in that he shouts the odds (Valley comment) and cries when he gets it back.

It’s a football forum. If you put out negativity be prepared to be called out by those more positive. It’s not stating you can’t it’s stating the reasons you shouldn’t. It’s called debate.

You owe a big apologie to Monty,

Who the f**k are you to Say something like that???

Absolutely do not. The loony left comment was in response to something he wrote Annis about loony left hassling people and likening them to the people (there are many) who don’t see things the way he does.

This post about ‘usual suspects’ is literally a dig at people who debate against negativity.

Many can see that and that’s causing the issues.

Can we not just listen to Vince Alm.

I agree, seeing the same from the usual suspects.

You know, the ones who are never on here when things are going well but come out of hiding after a bad result. Sadly they can never admit they were wrong, I and others have about previous players/managers.

They should be over the moon, because they said we'd be nowhere near top six. Never mind top two.

I'll judge the manager on the last 36 games, not the last 2.

And as for it being a football forum. Yeah it is and that's why I'll passionately defend my viewpoint as they do their's.

If we don't get top two then those who said we needed a striker will be right.

But if we do, those of us who said we didn't will be right.

Let's see what's what then.

This.

Monty is actually the epitome of the loony left in that he shouts the odds (Valley comment) and cries when he gets it back.

It’s a football forum. If you put out negativity be prepared to be called out by those more positive. It’s not stating you can’t it’s stating the reasons you shouldn’t. It’s called debate.

What odds have I shouted? You just like arguing end of anyone one who you deem negative your on them like a rash that's just shouting people down and I am not negative all the time I was there saturday waving my flag and cheering us on.

The valleys comment you had to apologise for.

I’m not shouting people down. I’m debating on a football forum.

You have said there if your negative be prepared to be called out, why? I said in the earlier comment there is a difference with hassling someone and debating.

But by making points against your negative comments, that is people debating.

And I don't buy the line of "it's just fans giving their honest opinions" when 99% of the time it's blatant negativity.

If we lose, highly critical of the team/manager. If we win, highly critical of the crowd. Whenever anything slightly goes wrong, blaming the squad size because you didn't get your way in the transfer window.

So yeah people will get called out for that. Just like they call me out for being positive. I'm more positive that negative but can also balance it out, like when I criticised the attacking performance on Tuesday but also have the sanity to know it's not a major drama.

I've said before that we will be better in the future without Tan, providing it's the right type of owner.

But others on here have lost all sense of perspective because they've become so obsessed with Tan.

That is me debating. Not being like the "loony left" as others do when they are challenged.

I agree, seeing the same from the usual suspects.

You know, the ones who are never on here when things are going well but come out of hiding after a bad result. Sadly they can never admit they were wrong, I and others have about previous players/managers.

They should be over the moon, because they said we'd be nowhere near top six. Never mind top two.

I'll judge the manager on the last 36 games, not the last 2.

And as for it being a football forum. Yeah it is and that's why I'll passionately defend my viewpoint as they do their's.

If we don't get top two then those who said we needed a striker will be right.

But if we do, those of us who said we didn't will be right.

Let's see what's what then.

This.

Monty is actually the epitome of the loony left in that he shouts the odds (Valley comment) and cries when he gets it back.

It’s a football forum. If you put out negativity be prepared to be called out by those more positive. It’s not stating you can’t it’s stating the reasons you shouldn’t. It’s called debate.

What odds have I shouted? You just like arguing end of anyone one who you deem negative your on them like a rash that's just shouting people down and I am not negative all the time I was there saturday waving my flag and cheering us on.

The valleys comment you had to apologise for.

I’m not shouting people down. I’m debating on a football forum.

You have said there if your negative be prepared to be called out, why? I said in the earlier comment there is a difference with hassling someone and debating.

But by making points against your negative comments, that is people debating.

And I don't buy the line of "it's just fans giving their honest opinions" when 99% of the time it's blatant negativity.

If we lose, highly critical of the team/manager. If we win, highly critical of the crowd. Whenever anything slightly goes wrong, blaming the squad size because you didn't get your way in the transfer window.

So yeah people will get called out for that. Just like they call me out for being positive. I'm more positive that negative but can also balance it out, like when I criticised the attacking performance on Tuesday but also have the sanity to know it's not a major drama.

I've said before that we will be better in the future without Tan, providing it's the right type of owner.

But others on here have lost all sense of perspective because they've become so obsessed with Tan.

That is me debating. Not being like the "loony left" as others do when they are challenged.

I will ask you this Ned:


Was Neil / Oxford United right to down Monty saying about being a Valley person / Mentality etc ?

I think it was well below the belt

We should all Respect each others opinions

I agree, seeing the same from the usual suspects.

You know, the ones who are never on here when things are going well but come out of hiding after a bad result. Sadly they can never admit they were wrong, I and others have about previous players/managers.

They should be over the moon, because they said we'd be nowhere near top six. Never mind top two.

I'll judge the manager on the last 36 games, not the last 2.

And as for it being a football forum. Yeah it is and that's why I'll passionately defend my viewpoint as they do their's.

If we don't get top two then those who said we needed a striker will be right.

But if we do, those of us who said we didn't will be right.

Let's see what's what then.

This.

Monty is actually the epitome of the loony left in that he shouts the odds (Valley comment) and cries when he gets it back.

It’s a football forum. If you put out negativity be prepared to be called out by those more positive. It’s not stating you can’t it’s stating the reasons you shouldn’t. It’s called debate.

What odds have I shouted? You just like arguing end of anyone one who you deem negative your on them like a rash that's just shouting people down and I am not negative all the time I was there saturday waving my flag and cheering us on.

The valleys comment you had to apologise for.

I’m not shouting people down. I’m debating on a football forum.

You have said there if your negative be prepared to be called out, why? I said in the earlier comment there is a difference with hassling someone and debating.

But by making points against your negative comments, that is people debating.

And I don't buy the line of "it's just fans giving their honest opinions" when 99% of the time it's blatant negativity.

If we lose, highly critical of the team/manager. If we win, highly critical of the crowd. Whenever anything slightly goes wrong, blaming the squad size because you didn't get your way in the transfer window.

So yeah people will get called out for that. Just like they call me out for being positive. I'm more positive that negative but can also balance it out, like when I criticised the attacking performance on Tuesday but also have the sanity to know it's not a major drama.

I've said before that we will be better in the future without Tan, providing it's the right type of owner.

But others on here have lost all sense of perspective because they've become so obsessed with Tan.

That is me debating. Not being like the "loony left" as others do when they are challenged.

You say people will be called out for been negative ,in other words don' t be negative on this forum or look out .

I agree, seeing the same from the usual suspects.

You know, the ones who are never on here when things are going well but come out of hiding after a bad result. Sadly they can never admit they were wrong, I and others have about previous players/managers.

They should be over the moon, because they said we'd be nowhere near top six. Never mind top two.

I'll judge the manager on the last 36 games, not the last 2.

And as for it being a football forum. Yeah it is and that's why I'll passionately defend my viewpoint as they do their's.

If we don't get top two then those who said we needed a striker will be right.

But if we do, those of us who said we didn't will be right.

Let's see what's what then.

This.

Monty is actually the epitome of the loony left in that he shouts the odds (Valley comment) and cries when he gets it back.

It’s a football forum. If you put out negativity be prepared to be called out by those more positive. It’s not stating you can’t it’s stating the reasons you shouldn’t. It’s called debate.

What odds have I shouted? You just like arguing end of anyone one who you deem negative your on them like a rash that's just shouting people down and I am not negative all the time I was there saturday waving my flag and cheering us on.

The valleys comment you had to apologise for.

I’m not shouting people down. I’m debating on a football forum.

You have said there if your negative be prepared to be called out, why? I said in the earlier comment there is a difference with hassling someone and debating.

But by making points against your negative comments, that is people debating.

And I don't buy the line of "it's just fans giving their honest opinions" when 99% of the time it's blatant negativity.

If we lose, highly critical of the team/manager. If we win, highly critical of the crowd. Whenever anything slightly goes wrong, blaming the squad size because you didn't get your way in the transfer window.

So yeah people will get called out for that. Just like they call me out for being positive. I'm more positive that negative but can also balance it out, like when I criticised the attacking performance on Tuesday but also have the sanity to know it's not a major drama.

I've said before that we will be better in the future without Tan, providing it's the right type of owner.

But others on here have lost all sense of perspective because they've become so obsessed with Tan.

That is me debating. Not being like the "loony left" as others do when they are challenged.

You say people will be called out for been negative ,in other words don' t be negative on this forum or look out .

Plus i am not the manager you said "because I did not get my way in the transfer window" what's that all about?

I agree, seeing the same from the usual suspects.

You know, the ones who are never on here when things are going well but come out of hiding after a bad result. Sadly they can never admit they were wrong, I and others have about previous players/managers.

They should be over the moon, because they said we'd be nowhere near top six. Never mind top two.

I'll judge the manager on the last 36 games, not the last 2.

And as for it being a football forum. Yeah it is and that's why I'll passionately defend my viewpoint as they do their's.

If we don't get top two then those who said we needed a striker will be right.

But if we do, those of us who said we didn't will be right.

Let's see what's what then.

This.

Monty is actually the epitome of the loony left in that he shouts the odds (Valley comment) and cries when he gets it back.

It’s a football forum. If you put out negativity be prepared to be called out by those more positive. It’s not stating you can’t it’s stating the reasons you shouldn’t. It’s called debate.

What odds have I shouted? You just like arguing end of anyone one who you deem negative your on them like a rash that's just shouting people down and I am not negative all the time I was there saturday waving my flag and cheering us on.

The valleys comment you had to apologise for.

I’m not shouting people down. I’m debating on a football forum.

You have said there if your negative be prepared to be called out, why? I said in the earlier comment there is a difference with hassling someone and debating.

But by making points against your negative comments, that is people debating.

And I don't buy the line of "it's just fans giving their honest opinions" when 99% of the time it's blatant negativity.

If we lose, highly critical of the team/manager. If we win, highly critical of the crowd. Whenever anything slightly goes wrong, blaming the squad size because you didn't get your way in the transfer window.

So yeah people will get called out for that. Just like they call me out for being positive. I'm more positive that negative but can also balance it out, like when I criticised the attacking performance on Tuesday but also have the sanity to know it's not a major drama.

I've said before that we will be better in the future without Tan, providing it's the right type of owner.

But others on here have lost all sense of perspective because they've become so obsessed with Tan.

That is me debating. Not being like the "loony left" as others do when they are challenged.

I will ask you this Ned:


Was Neil / Oxford United right to down Monty saying about being a Valley person / Mentality etc ?

I think it was well below the belt

We should all Respect each others opinions

Annis, I was not downing Monty for being a valley person at all. Monty said that to someone the other day and apologised. I was using that as an example to point out (like many others did) that he can give it but doesn’t like taking it.

You are actually agreeing with me. Yes it’s not right people use valleys at all as a criticism.

I agree, seeing the same from the usual suspects.

You know, the ones who are never on here when things are going well but come out of hiding after a bad result. Sadly they can never admit they were wrong, I and others have about previous players/managers.

They should be over the moon, because they said we'd be nowhere near top six. Never mind top two.

I'll judge the manager on the last 36 games, not the last 2.

And as for it being a football forum. Yeah it is and that's why I'll passionately defend my viewpoint as they do their's.

If we don't get top two then those who said we needed a striker will be right.

But if we do, those of us who said we didn't will be right.

Let's see what's what then.

This.

Monty is actually the epitome of the loony left in that he shouts the odds (Valley comment) and cries when he gets it back.

It’s a football forum. If you put out negativity be prepared to be called out by those more positive. It’s not stating you can’t it’s stating the reasons you shouldn’t. It’s called debate.

What odds have I shouted? You just like arguing end of anyone one who you deem negative your on them like a rash that's just shouting people down and I am not negative all the time I was there saturday waving my flag and cheering us on.

The valleys comment you had to apologise for.

I’m not shouting people down. I’m debating on a football forum.

You have said there if your negative be prepared to be called out, why? I said in the earlier comment there is a difference with hassling someone and debating.

But by making points against your negative comments, that is people debating.

And I don't buy the line of "it's just fans giving their honest opinions" when 99% of the time it's blatant negativity.

If we lose, highly critical of the team/manager. If we win, highly critical of the crowd. Whenever anything slightly goes wrong, blaming the squad size because you didn't get your way in the transfer window.

So yeah people will get called out for that. Just like they call me out for being positive. I'm more positive that negative but can also balance it out, like when I criticised the attacking performance on Tuesday but also have the sanity to know it's not a major drama.

I've said before that we will be better in the future without Tan, providing it's the right type of owner.

But others on here have lost all sense of perspective because they've become so obsessed with Tan.

That is me debating. Not being like the "loony left" as others do when they are challenged.

I will ask you this Ned:


Was Neil / Oxford United right to down Monty saying about being a Valley person / Mentality etc ?

I think it was well below the belt

We should all Respect each others opinions

Monty threw an insult at me for being from the valleys, was he right to do that because I have a different opinion on one subject to him and he can’t handle it?

I agree, seeing the same from the usual suspects.

You know, the ones who are never on here when things are going well but come out of hiding after a bad result. Sadly they can never admit they were wrong, I and others have about previous players/managers.

They should be over the moon, because they said we'd be nowhere near top six. Never mind top two.

I'll judge the manager on the last 36 games, not the last 2.

And as for it being a football forum. Yeah it is and that's why I'll passionately defend my viewpoint as they do their's.

If we don't get top two then those who said we needed a striker will be right.

But if we do, those of us who said we didn't will be right.

Let's see what's what then.

This.

Monty is actually the epitome of the loony left in that he shouts the odds (Valley comment) and cries when he gets it back.

It’s a football forum. If you put out negativity be prepared to be called out by those more positive. It’s not stating you can’t it’s stating the reasons you shouldn’t. It’s called debate.

What odds have I shouted? You just like arguing end of anyone one who you deem negative your on them like a rash that's just shouting people down and I am not negative all the time I was there saturday waving my flag and cheering us on.

The valleys comment you had to apologise for.

I’m not shouting people down. I’m debating on a football forum.

You have said there if your negative be prepared to be called out, why? I said in the earlier comment there is a difference with hassling someone and debating.

But by making points against your negative comments, that is people debating.

And I don't buy the line of "it's just fans giving their honest opinions" when 99% of the time it's blatant negativity.

If we lose, highly critical of the team/manager. If we win, highly critical of the crowd. Whenever anything slightly goes wrong, blaming the squad size because you didn't get your way in the transfer window.

So yeah people will get called out for that. Just like they call me out for being positive. I'm more positive that negative but can also balance it out, like when I criticised the attacking performance on Tuesday but also have the sanity to know it's not a major drama.

I've said before that we will be better in the future without Tan, providing it's the right type of owner.

But others on here have lost all sense of perspective because they've become so obsessed with Tan.

That is me debating. Not being like the "loony left" as others do when they are challenged.

I will ask you this Ned:


Was Neil / Oxford United right to down Monty saying about being a Valley person / Mentality etc ?

I think it was well below the belt

We should all Respect each others opinions

Monty threw an insult at me for being from the valleys, was he right to do that because I have a different opinion on one subject to him and he can’t handle it?

I wish I could find it but I can’t be arsed looking too hard.

Yeah Annis has the wrong end of the stick here. I’m not sure I saw him go at Monty like he went at me then for what he thought I said but was actually just saying what Monty said.

viewtopic.php?f=2&t=248420&p=2562022#p2562022

It was this thread about 9 or 10 posts in foreverblue if you want to have a read, he went at a few others as well that day for differing opinions.

Monty ignore these multi twats they or he just wants to disrupt this forum. If they hi jack your topic or post pretend they ain’t there , hi Jack maybe that’s what he is

Monty ignore these multi twats they or he just wants to disrupt this forum. If they hi jack your topic or post pretend they ain’t there , hi Jack maybe that’s what he is

lol. Embarrassing bit of white knighting. Have you even read the thread?
You think it’s alright then to insult people for different opinions?

Monty ignore these multi twats they or he just wants to disrupt this forum. If they hi jack your topic or post pretend they ain’t there , hi Jack maybe that’s what he is

lol. Embarrassing bit of white knighting. Have you even read the thread?
You think it’s alright then to insult people for different opinions?

Is it me or you he’s having a pop at?

Ironic he mentions multis.

No response. Says it all. Insulting people from the valleys clearly alright then it turns out.

No response. Says it all. Insulting people from the valleys clearly alright then it turns out.

2 family funerals yesterday and tuesday if you want anymore pm me.

I agree, seeing the same from the usual suspects.

You know, the ones who are never on here when things are going well but come out of hiding after a bad result. Sadly they can never admit they were wrong, I and others have about previous players/managers.

They should be over the moon, because they said we'd be nowhere near top six. Never mind top two.

I'll judge the manager on the last 36 games, not the last 2.

And as for it being a football forum. Yeah it is and that's why I'll passionately defend my viewpoint as they do their's.

If we don't get top two then those who said we needed a striker will be right.

But if we do, those of us who said we didn't will be right.

Let's see what's what then.

This.

Monty is actually the epitome of the loony left in that he shouts the odds (Valley comment) and cries when he gets it back.

It’s a football forum. If you put out negativity be prepared to be called out by those more positive. It’s not stating you can’t it’s stating the reasons you shouldn’t. It’s called debate.

What odds have I shouted? You just like arguing end of anyone one who you deem negative your on them like a rash that's just shouting people down and I am not negative all the time I was there saturday waving my flag and cheering us on.

The valleys comment you had to apologise for.

I’m not shouting people down. I’m debating on a football forum.

You have said there if your negative be prepared to be called out, why? I said in the earlier comment there is a difference with hassling someone and debating.

But by making points against your negative comments, that is people debating.

And I don't buy the line of "it's just fans giving their honest opinions" when 99% of the time it's blatant negativity.

If we lose, highly critical of the team/manager. If we win, highly critical of the crowd. Whenever anything slightly goes wrong, blaming the squad size because you didn't get your way in the transfer window.

So yeah people will get called out for that. Just like they call me out for being positive. I'm more positive that negative but can also balance it out, like when I criticised the attacking performance on Tuesday but also have the sanity to know it's not a major drama.

I've said before that we will be better in the future without Tan, providing it's the right type of owner.

But others on here have lost all sense of perspective because they've become so obsessed with Tan.

That is me debating. Not being like the "loony left" as others do when they are challenged.

I will ask you this Ned:


Was Neil / Oxford United right to down Monty saying about being a Valley person / Mentality etc ?

I think it was well below the belt

We should all Respect each others opinions

Monty threw an insult at me for being from the valleys, was he right to do that because I have a different opinion on one subject to him and he can’t handle it?

Sorry I thought it was Neil who did the insult about the Valleys.


NO it’s not right for anyone to do insults about the Valleys at all.