Thu Jul 10, 2025 12:18 pm
Thu Jul 10, 2025 12:33 pm
Thu Jul 10, 2025 5:33 pm
worcester_ccfc wrote:No, Dalman wants Tan out of the club as much as anyone.
Whoever takes over the club, Dalman will be pleased - even if it means him moving on.
Thu Jul 10, 2025 11:11 pm
Fri Jul 11, 2025 8:02 am
TopCat CCFC wrote:Let's not forget - Dalman is owed money from our Club - with interest
Fri Jul 11, 2025 9:26 am
Fri Jul 11, 2025 11:37 am
wez1927 wrote:Dalman is an unsecured debt , like Langstone was, i wonder how hes going to get his money back ? If the new owners don't fancy paying him off ? .
Fri Jul 11, 2025 7:17 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:wez1927 wrote:Dalman is an unsecured debt , like Langstone was, i wonder how hes going to get his money back ? If the new owners don't fancy paying him off ? .
Court action?
Sat Jul 12, 2025 12:45 pm
wez1927 wrote:Dalman is an unsecured debt , like Langstone was, i wonder how hes going to get his money back ? If the new owners don't fancy paying him off ? .
Sat Jul 12, 2025 7:51 pm
Mac1927 wrote:wez1927 wrote:Dalman is an unsecured debt , like Langstone was, i wonder how hes going to get his money back ? If the new owners don't fancy paying him off ? .
I’d imagine Dalman could be on quite shaky ground with his loan/ investment on how it was agreed/ structured. Our club is a great example of how investors have been shafted in the past
Sun Jul 13, 2025 8:43 am
worcester_ccfc wrote:No, Dalman wants Tan out of the club as much as anyone.
Whoever takes over the club, Dalman will be pleased - even if it means him moving on.
Sun Jul 13, 2025 10:48 am
Welsh Exile wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:No, Dalman wants Tan out of the club as much as anyone.
Whoever takes over the club, Dalman will be pleased - even if it means him moving on.
But not if he doesnt get his money straight away, then he wont be pleased and that is why I have asked the question is it possible that he could scupper another deal with Tan if he himself isnt getting what he wants out of it.
Sun Jul 13, 2025 12:14 pm
Welsh Exile wrote:worcester_ccfc wrote:No, Dalman wants Tan out of the club as much as anyone.
Whoever takes over the club, Dalman will be pleased - even if it means him moving on.
But not if he doesnt get his money straight away, then he wont be pleased and that is why I have asked the question is it possible that he could scupper another deal with Tan if he himself isnt getting what he wants out of it.
Sun Jul 13, 2025 5:34 pm
Welsh Exile wrote:Could Damian scupper a deal if his consortium are not the front runners ?
It was said in another thread that the South African bid is currently favourite followed by Dalman’s and lastly Bale’s, as Dalman has loans to the club to the tune of £40m, if the South African deal means he doesn’t get what he wants could he therefore force it off the table, making his bid the more favourable one ?
I have made it public on here many times that I don't trust Dalman and dont believe a word that comes out of his mouth, I just hope he doesn’t now scupper a potential deal that could be better for CCFC in the long run, or even do enough damage that Tan decides not to sell at all as not everyone is in agreement.
Sun Jul 13, 2025 5:37 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:wez1927 wrote:Dalman is an unsecured debt , like Langstone was, i wonder how hes going to get his money back ? If the new owners don't fancy paying him off ? .
Court action?