Sat Apr 12, 2025 4:26 pm
Sat Apr 12, 2025 4:30 pm
Sat Apr 12, 2025 4:33 pm
Paul Keevil wrote:So at the start of this season VT wanted £200m for a club worth £130m tops.
Relegation to Division 1 will drop the value of the club to in the region of £50m.
What will Tan do now?
1) Invest to try and get his money back or;
2) Sell up.
Sat Apr 12, 2025 4:34 pm
Sat Apr 12, 2025 4:41 pm
Sat Apr 12, 2025 4:43 pm
Sat Apr 12, 2025 4:55 pm
GrangeEndStar wrote:Disastrous result today. We are not playing like a team in a relegation fight with a gun against its head. We are now reliant on others results and I can't see where the wins are going to now come from.
It was Tans decision to go with an unproven manager which is risk you can't take - so this is down to him.
We could see this happening months ago, some of us even longer than that and that's why we protested. This is what you get and we could all see it coming. It's criminal.
Sat Apr 12, 2025 5:09 pm
Sat Apr 12, 2025 5:12 pm
Sven wrote:GrangeEndStar wrote:Disastrous result today. We are not playing like a team in a relegation fight with a gun against its head. We are now reliant on others results and I can't see where the wins are going to now come from.
It was Tans decision to go with an unproven manager which is risk you can't take - so this is down to him.
We could see this happening months ago, some of us even longer than that and that's why we protested. This is what you get and we could all see it coming. It's criminal.
Seems Vincent’s mismanagement has finally caught up with us; at great financial cost to himself and emotional cost to us supporters
Sadly, I believe he won’t do ‘the decent thing’ and leave/sell up and we will now be in a worse place than we were before he arrived. I find it so sad that he never learned as he went along
Sat Apr 12, 2025 5:15 pm
Sven wrote:GrangeEndStar wrote:Disastrous result today. We are not playing like a team in a relegation fight with a gun against its head. We are now reliant on others results and I can't see where the wins are going to now come from.
It was Tans decision to go with an unproven manager which is risk you can't take - so this is down to him.
We could see this happening months ago, some of us even longer than that and that's why we protested. This is what you get and we could all see it coming. It's criminal.
Seems Vincent’s mismanagement has finally caught up with us; at great financial cost to himself and emotional cost to us supporters
Sadly, I believe he won’t do ‘the decent thing’ and leave/sell up and we will now be in a worse place than we were before he arrived. I find it so sad that he never learned as he went along
Sat Apr 12, 2025 5:18 pm
Sat Apr 12, 2025 5:32 pm
Sat Apr 12, 2025 5:34 pm
Paul Keevil wrote:At the start of the season I understand there was a party willing to pay in the region of £125m.
I wonder, if they put a bid in for £75m, and allocated £50m for development, I wonder whether Tan would accept that?
Lets be clear about this. Having CCFC drop to the 3rd Tier and Kortrijk drop down to the 2nd tier would be a significant proof of failure to VT.
Sat Apr 12, 2025 5:35 pm
Paul Keevil wrote:At the start of the season I understand there was a party willing to pay in the region of £125m.
I wonder, if they put a bid in for £75m, and allocated £50m for development, I wonder whether Tan would accept that?
Lets be clear about this. Having CCFC drop to the 3rd Tier and Kortrijk drop down to the 2nd tier would be a significant proof of failure to VT.
Sun Apr 13, 2025 12:57 pm
Sun Apr 13, 2025 2:08 pm
Sun Apr 13, 2025 3:23 pm
Sun Apr 13, 2025 4:01 pm
Sun Apr 13, 2025 8:01 pm
GrangeEndStar wrote:My error on an earlier post. The stadium is worth £86 and the squad £41, so the club is currently worth around £127M.
The accounts say that third party loans (mainly Dalman) are secured against assets so I imagine that the stadium is the security.
Sun Apr 13, 2025 8:05 pm
Mon Apr 14, 2025 9:13 am
Ryanccfc24 wrote:Are the protests happening for the last 2 home games? Gone a little bit quiet but those protests need happening. Enough is enough
Mon Apr 14, 2025 9:45 am
Mon Apr 14, 2025 10:26 am
wez1927 wrote:GrangeEndStar wrote:My error on an earlier post. The stadium is worth £86 and the squad £41, so the club is currently worth around £127M.
The accounts say that third party loans (mainly Dalman) are secured against assets so I imagine that the stadium is the security.
The only charge is Tan not anyone else.
Mon Apr 14, 2025 12:31 pm
pembroke allan wrote:wez1927 wrote:GrangeEndStar wrote:My error on an earlier post. The stadium is worth £86 and the squad £41, so the club is currently worth around £127M.
The accounts say that third party loans (mainly Dalman) are secured against assets so I imagine that the stadium is the security.
The only charge is Tan not anyone else.
The stadium is not saleable unless council changes its covenant on it.. whilst it is classed as asset for monetary considerations I would imagine dalman cannot put charge on it.. or is this not correct?
Mon Apr 14, 2025 1:05 pm
wez1927 wrote:pembroke allan wrote:wez1927 wrote:GrangeEndStar wrote:My error on an earlier post. The stadium is worth £86 and the squad £41, so the club is currently worth around £127M.
The accounts say that third party loans (mainly Dalman) are secured against assets so I imagine that the stadium is the security.
The only charge is Tan not anyone else.
The stadium is not saleable unless council changes its covenant on it.. whilst it is classed as asset for monetary considerations I would imagine dalman cannot put charge on it.. or is this not correct?
It's still an asset the club owns the building not the land but it's on a big lease , no one can put a charge on the club atm coz tan has a floating charge on all assets he has to agree to the charge to be placed ie Barclays bank in the past .
Mon Apr 14, 2025 4:19 pm
pembroke allan wrote:wez1927 wrote:pembroke allan wrote:wez1927 wrote:GrangeEndStar wrote:My error on an earlier post. The stadium is worth £86 and the squad £41, so the club is currently worth around £127M.
The accounts say that third party loans (mainly Dalman) are secured against assets so I imagine that the stadium is the security.
The only charge is Tan not anyone else.
The stadium is not saleable unless council changes its covenant on it.. whilst it is classed as asset for monetary considerations I would imagine dalman cannot put charge on it.. or is this not correct?
It's still an asset the club owns the building not the land but it's on a big lease , no one can put a charge on the club atm coz tan has a floating charge on all assets he has to agree to the charge to be placed ie Barclays bank in the past .
But can it be sold as separate entity like Coventry and Derby have amongst others?