Wed Jul 12, 2023 2:25 am
Wed Jul 12, 2023 5:57 am
Bluebirds2003 wrote:Arsenal legend Aaron Ramsey a surprise name in French club’s pre-season plans. Don't know what to make of this? If true then we move on, but dalman you promised us we'd get a name that would sell 18 k plus, if turns out to not be true once again then us fans won't forgive you.
Wed Jul 12, 2023 7:27 am
bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Bluebirds2003 wrote:Arsenal legend Aaron Ramsey a surprise name in French club’s pre-season plans. Don't know what to make of this? If true then we move on, but dalman you promised us we'd get a name that would sell 18 k plus, if turns out to not be true once again then us fans won't forgive you.
It’s The Sun. Don’t panic.
Wed Jul 12, 2023 7:28 am
Wed Jul 12, 2023 7:30 am
Wed Jul 12, 2023 8:23 am
Wed Jul 12, 2023 8:26 am
Wed Jul 12, 2023 8:52 am
Bluebird 67 wrote:It's hopefully just crap journalism cos he has nt signed anywhere yet
Wed Jul 12, 2023 9:00 am
DITH80 wrote:Bluebird 67 wrote:It's hopefully just crap journalism cos he has nt signed anywhere yet
If you go to OGC Nice official website you will see that Ramsey has been named in their 2023-24 squad and given a squad number which is different to last season.
The site also says that Ramsey will return to training at the beginning of next week.
If Nice have triggered the one year contract extension, which they are entitled to do, then Ramsey is their player.
If Nice demand a fee to cancel this contract, we won't be able to sign him!
Wed Jul 12, 2023 9:07 am
Wed Jul 12, 2023 9:14 am
Wed Jul 12, 2023 9:18 am
BLUE54 wrote:This is concerning. It doesn't seem an oversight if they've given him a new squad number and expect him to stay with them for next season. It may be out of his and our hands. It appears that we are supposedly "just waiting" for paperwork from Nice. Let's hope that it comes.
Wed Jul 12, 2023 9:25 am
Wed Jul 12, 2023 9:33 am
JJ1927 wrote:Surely if they had the right to an extension this would have to be done before the old one ran out? And if it was done, why the hell has everyone been kept in the dark over this. Ramsey obviously must have known, but Dalman?
Wed Jul 12, 2023 9:36 am
JJ1927 wrote:Surely if they had the right to an extension this would have to be done before the old one ran out? And if it was done, why the hell has everyone been kept in the dark over this. Ramsey obviously must have known, but Dalman?
Wed Jul 12, 2023 9:59 am
Wed Jul 12, 2023 10:25 am
BLUE54 wrote:I've just checked on their site for the player list for next season, and his name is NOT on their player list . It was on last years list though. So hopefully
Wed Jul 12, 2023 11:55 am
bluebirdoct1962 wrote:JJ1927 wrote:Surely if they had the right to an extension this would have to be done before the old one ran out? And if it was done, why the hell has everyone been kept in the dark over this. Ramsey obviously must have known, but Dalman?
My thoughts exactly
Wed Jul 12, 2023 12:15 pm
Igovernor wrote:bluebirdoct1962 wrote:JJ1927 wrote:Surely if they had the right to an extension this would have to be done before the old one ran out? And if it was done, why the hell has everyone been kept in the dark over this. Ramsey obviously must have known, but Dalman?
My thoughts exactly
It may be that it is AR's choice whether to trigger the extension, as he originally turned down a long contract!
Wed Jul 12, 2023 1:35 pm
Wed Jul 12, 2023 2:09 pm
Wed Jul 12, 2023 2:20 pm
Paul Keevil wrote:It seems to me that when such a clause is in a contract it is usually a half way measure.
For example you could have a player who wants a 3 or 4 year contract but the club, knowing the player is aging, do not want to commit to such a long contract for fear of paying someone who is not playing.
It is therefore common sense for a club (Nice in this instance) to suggest that if you play x number of games we will offer you an extension on your contract at a minimum of the same salary.
Despite an extension being offered the player does not have to accept that extension
That is my take on it.
Wed Jul 12, 2023 2:29 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:Paul Keevil wrote:It seems to me that when such a clause is in a contract it is usually a half way measure.
For example you could have a player who wants a 3 or 4 year contract but the club, knowing the player is aging, do not want to commit to such a long contract for fear of paying someone who is not playing.
It is therefore common sense for a club (Nice in this instance) to suggest that if you play x number of games we will offer you an extension on your contract at a minimum of the same salary.
Despite an extension being offered the player does not have to accept that extension
That is my take on it.
Makes sense
So if Rambo wants to come home why are Nice not letting him go?
Wed Jul 12, 2023 3:13 pm
bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Paul Keevil wrote:It seems to me that when such a clause is in a contract it is usually a half way measure.
For example you could have a player who wants a 3 or 4 year contract but the club, knowing the player is aging, do not want to commit to such a long contract for fear of paying someone who is not playing.
It is therefore common sense for a club (Nice in this instance) to suggest that if you play x number of games we will offer you an extension on your contract at a minimum of the same salary.
Despite an extension being offered the player does not have to accept that extension
That is my take on it.
Makes sense
So if Rambo wants to come home why are Nice not letting him go?
Maybe they are (or have).
Wed Jul 12, 2023 3:17 pm
Bakedalasker wrote:Paul Keevil wrote:It seems to me that when such a clause is in a contract it is usually a half way measure.
For example you could have a player who wants a 3 or 4 year contract but the club, knowing the player is aging, do not want to commit to such a long contract for fear of paying someone who is not playing.
It is therefore common sense for a club (Nice in this instance) to suggest that if you play x number of games we will offer you an extension on your contract at a minimum of the same salary.
Despite an extension being offered the player does not have to accept that extension
That is my take on it.
Makes sense
So if Rambo wants to come home why are Nice not letting him go?
Wed Jul 12, 2023 3:24 pm
Paul Keevil wrote:Bakedalasker wrote:Paul Keevil wrote:It seems to me that when such a clause is in a contract it is usually a half way measure.
For example you could have a player who wants a 3 or 4 year contract but the club, knowing the player is aging, do not want to commit to such a long contract for fear of paying someone who is not playing.
It is therefore common sense for a club (Nice in this instance) to suggest that if you play x number of games we will offer you an extension on your contract at a minimum of the same salary.
Despite an extension being offered the player does not have to accept that extension
That is my take on it.
Makes sense
So if Rambo wants to come home why are Nice not letting him go?
Maybe they are trying to suggest to him to take an extension so they can sell him for a fee. Only that doesn't fit with Rambo's plans - because we cant pay a fee.
Just a suggestion ?
Wed Jul 12, 2023 4:32 pm
JJ1927 wrote:Surely if they had the right to an extension this would have to be done before the old one ran out? And if it was done, why the hell has everyone been kept in the dark over this. Ramsey obviously must have known, but Dalman?