MANAGER BOLLOCKS : We do have a manager …..

My View:


MANAGER BOLLOCKS :


We do have a manager ….. Vincent Tan !!


The least qualified manager in history ….managing us from 6000 miles away.

Our big big problem is that he decides on the buying and selling and wages.


The “so called manager” has to talk to him before and after the game to discuss the team (I believe also agree the team).

He bombards the manager with texts during the game with instructions.


Our new “manager” has to be desperate for the job. Either it has to be someone who can’t believe his luck to get a chance ….or it is a good manager who has been out for a while and desperately needs to get back in - before he is forgotten.


There is no way a really good manager would touch us - under these circumstances .

I hope I am wrong in my assessment or that Tan has reformed.


I believe that Tan had his head up his own arse …so to speak….. I think he really fancies himself as very knowledgeable in everything football. The man is delusional and it is no longer funny or acceptable .

You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

they read this board my one plain simple message is fook off as far away from cardiff city as possible -

you had your time ere - we thank you for your efforts but its time now to give in move on recoup what ever is owed and move

on there must be someone out there wiling to back club and hungry for stability and success in the future

Reply FB:

You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Reply FB:

You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Reply FB:

You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Reply FB:

You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Rely FB:

You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Reply FB:

You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

If this is the narrative, he also got us promoted to the Premier League twice and to a Carling Cup final, making him our most successful manager.

You can't blame him for the downfalls and not credit him for the successes if we're using this "Tan is the manager" as our narrative.

Reply FB:

You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

If this is the narrative, he also got us promoted to the Premier League twice and to a Carling Cup final, making him our most successful manager.

You can't blame him for the downfalls and not credit him for the successes if we're using this "Tan is the manager" as our narrative.

And he sacked them both managers because they would not listen to him and they were both loved by the fans

Just remember

If this is the narrative, he also got us promoted to the Premier League twice and to a Carling Cup final, making him our most successful manager.

You can't blame him for the downfalls and not credit him for the successes if we're using this "Tan is the manager" as our narrative.

And he sacked them both managers because they would not listen to him and they were both loved by the fans

Just remember

So when we do well, Tan's not the manager, and the managers are doing their job, but when we do bad, Tan is the manager and does the manager's job? Is that the logic?

Malky was fired after being caught sending questionable text messages about the owner, which would get you sacked in almost any job.

The other appeared to have lost his influence as an aging manager, and we were sliding down the table.

All I am asking for is consistency in the arguments and logic.

If this is the narrative, he also got us promoted to the Premier League twice and to a Carling Cup final, making him our most successful manager.

You can't blame him for the downfalls and not credit him for the successes if we're using this "Tan is the manager" as our narrative.

I can't imagine Warnock allowing any interference in team selection during his time at Cardiff

If this is the narrative, he also got us promoted to the Premier League twice and to a Carling Cup final, making him our most successful manager.

You can't blame him for the downfalls and not credit him for the successes if we're using this "Tan is the manager" as our narrative.

I can't imagine Warnock allowing any interference in team selection during his time at Cardiff

Correct he never.

Reply FB:

You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

If this is the narrative, he also got us promoted to the Premier League twice and to a Carling Cup final, making him our most successful manager.

You can't blame him for the downfalls and not credit him for the successes if we're using this "Tan is the manager" as our narrative.

And he sacked them both managers because they would not listen to him and they were both loved by the fans

Just remember

So when we do well, Tan's not the manager, and the managers are doing their job, but when we do bad, Tan is the manager and does the manager's job? Is that the logic?

Malky was fired after being caught sending questionable text messages about the owner, which would get you sacked in almost any job.

The other appeared to have lost his influence as an aging manager, and we were sliding down the table.

All I am asking for is consistency in the arguments and logic.

Open your eyes have a look at the amount of yes men and how we have faired and yes Tan picked them.

You know the list I can’t be bothered going through the pathetic list.

Just keep supporting Tan and you won’t have a club to follow.

TAN OUT

You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

ITS FUNNY HOW ALL THE REAL NANES /FB:

There will def be people working for them posting Hmmmm?

Are ALL for Tan out:

You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

If this is the narrative, he also got us promoted to the Premier League twice and to a Carling Cup final, making him our most successful manager.

You can't blame him for the downfalls and not credit him for the successes if we're using this "Tan is the manager" as our narrative.

And he sacked them both managers because they would not listen to him and they were both loved by the fans

Just remember

So when we do well, Tan's not the manager, and the managers are doing their job, but when we do bad, Tan is the manager and does the manager's job? Is that the logic?

Malky was fired after being caught sending questionable text messages about the owner, which would get you sacked in almost any job.

The other appeared to have lost his influence as an aging manager, and we were sliding down the table.

All I am asking for is consistency in the arguments and logic.

Open your eyes have a look at the amount of yes men and how we have faired and yes Tan picked them.

You know the list I can’t be bothered going through the pathetic list.

Just keep supporting Tan and you won’t have a club to follow.

TAN OUT

I'm not "supporting Tan."

I'm critically questioning your logic, as it's inconsistent. You can see from my previous posts I am in favor of him leaving for the right person.

I just ask for consistency and truth.

You talk about not having a club to support, yet a previous owner you are in awe of literally nearly took us out of business. It was a result of his poor management of the club, that we ended up with Ridsdale and then Tan. That was the direct consequence of his actions.

We all want the best for the club, so let's unite around that rather than dividing the fanbase, which is what much of the rhetoric (not all) I read on this board does.

Last edited by JasonFowler1991 on Mon Jan 23, 2023 5:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.

LETS BE REALISTIC NO ONE CAN DEFEND TAN ANYMORE WITH THE STATE OUR CLUS IS ON AND OFF THE PITCH:

You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

If this is the narrative, he also got us promoted to the Premier League twice and to a Carling Cup final, making him our most successful manager.

You can't blame him for the downfalls and not credit him for the successes if we're using this "Tan is the manager" as our narrative.

And he sacked them both managers because they would not listen to him and they were both loved by the fans

Just remember

So when we do well, Tan's not the manager, and the managers are doing their job, but when we do bad, Tan is the manager and does the manager's job? Is that the logic?

Malky was fired after being caught sending questionable text messages about the owner, which would get you sacked in almost any job.

The other appeared to have lost his influence as an aging manager, and we were sliding down the table.

All I am asking for is consistency in the arguments and logic.

Open your eyes have a look at the amount of yes men and how we have faired and yes Tan picked them.

You know the list I can’t be bothered going through the pathetic list.

Just keep supporting Tan and you won’t have a club to follow.

TAN OUT

I'm not "supporting Tan."

I'm critically questioning your logic, as it's inconsistent. You can see from my previous posts I am in favor of him leaving for the right person.

I just ask for consistency and truth.

You talk about not having a club to support, yet a previous owner you are in awe of literally nearly took us out of business. It was a result of his poor management of the club, that we ended up with Ridsdale and then Tan. That was the direct consequence of his actions.

We all want the best for the club, so let's unite around that rather than dividing the fanbase, which is what much of the rhetoric (not all) I read on this board does.

Are you serious? How can I unite with a Tan follower and sticks up for him.

We are more in debt than ever in our history / lowest position for 20 years / club in turmoil / Manager after manager / worst run on the pitch in 120 years etc etc etc etc etc

If this is the narrative, he also got us promoted to the Premier League twice and to a Carling Cup final, making him our most successful manager.

You can't blame him for the downfalls and not credit him for the successes if we're using this "Tan is the manager" as our narrative.

And he sacked them both managers because they would not listen to him and they were both loved by the fans

Just remember

So when we do well, Tan's not the manager, and the managers are doing their job, but when we do bad, Tan is the manager and does the manager's job? Is that the logic?

Malky was fired after being caught sending questionable text messages about the owner, which would get you sacked in almost any job.

The other appeared to have lost his influence as an aging manager, and we were sliding down the table.

All I am asking for is consistency in the arguments and logic.

Open your eyes have a look at the amount of yes men and how we have faired and yes Tan picked them.

You know the list I can’t be bothered going through the pathetic list.

Just keep supporting Tan and you won’t have a club to follow.

TAN OUT

I'm not "supporting Tan."

I'm critically questioning your logic, as it's inconsistent. You can see from my previous posts I am in favor of him leaving for the right person.

I just ask for consistency and truth.

You talk about not having a club to support, yet a previous owner you are in awe of literally nearly took us out of business. It was a result of his poor management of the club, that we ended up with Ridsdale and then Tan. That was the direct consequence of his actions.

We all want the best for the club, so let's unite around that rather than dividing the fanbase, which is what much of the rhetoric (not all) I read on this board does.

Are you serious? How can I unite with a Tan follower and sticks up for him.

We are more in debt than ever in our history / lowest position for 20 years / club in turmoil / Manager after manager / worst run on the pitch in 120 years etc etc etc etc etc

So it's either "agree with me, or we cannot unite" - and that, at the heart of it, is much of the problem. Our fans are as much to blame for the divide as our board is.

Until common ground is found, we won't move forward, and our club will continue to eat itself. This isn't just true for football clubs, but for society as a whole.

If this is the narrative, he also got us promoted to the Premier League twice and to a Carling Cup final, making him our most successful manager.

You can't blame him for the downfalls and not credit him for the successes if we're using this "Tan is the manager" as our narrative.

And he sacked them both managers because they would not listen to him and they were both loved by the fans

Just remember

So when we do well, Tan's not the manager, and the managers are doing their job, but when we do bad, Tan is the manager and does the manager's job? Is that the logic?

Malky was fired after being caught sending questionable text messages about the owner, which would get you sacked in almost any job.

The other appeared to have lost his influence as an aging manager, and we were sliding down the table.

All I am asking for is consistency in the arguments and logic.

Open your eyes have a look at the amount of yes men and how we have faired and yes Tan picked them.

You know the list I can’t be bothered going through the pathetic list.

Just keep supporting Tan and you won’t have a club to follow.

TAN OUT

I'm not "supporting Tan."

I'm critically questioning your logic, as it's inconsistent. You can see from my previous posts I am in favor of him leaving for the right person.

I just ask for consistency and truth.

You talk about not having a club to support, yet a previous owner you are in awe of literally nearly took us out of business. It was a result of his poor management of the club, that we ended up with Ridsdale and then Tan. That was the direct consequence of his actions.

We all want the best for the club, so let's unite around that rather than dividing the fanbase, which is what much of the rhetoric (not all) I read on this board does.

Are you serious? How can I unite with a Tan follower and sticks up for him.

We are more in debt than ever in our history / lowest position for 20 years / club in turmoil / Manager after manager / worst run on the pitch in 120 years etc etc etc etc etc

So it's either "agree with me, or we cannot unite" - and that, at the heart of it, is much of the problem. Our fans are as much to blame for the divide as our board is.

Until common ground is found, we won't move forward, and our club will continue to eat itself. This isn't just true for football clubs, but for society as a whole.

How can we unite???

We are totally the opposite, beyond opposite.

Their No common ground our club is say fucked , you are either very naive or work for them.


Your blaming our fans, unbelievable, are you Dalman , Shocking

Replies FB:

You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Please stop putting pictures of him on here he a vile big headed know it all. No one can argue with him as a business man as he is very rich man but you only have to listen to his interviews he thinks he is god and we all should admire him he says Malky didnt get us promoted he did, what a pile of shit the man is mad.

If we go down he will blame everyone but himself and the worry I have he will not sell then as the club will be worth even less in league 1 and he will think he will take us back up with his great skills on football you must shoot drop the goalkeeper as he did not score the man has issues and needs help.

Reply FB:

You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Please stop putting pictures of him on here he a vile big headed know it all. No one can argue with him as a business man as he is very rich man but you only have to listen to his interviews he thinks he is god and we all should admire him he says Malky didnt get us promoted he did, what a pile of shit the man is mad.

If we go down he will blame everyone but himself and the worry I have he will not sell then as the club will be worth even less in league 1 and he will think he will take us back up with his great skills on football you must shoot drop the goalkeeper as he did not score the man has issues and needs help.

Sorry your right, it actually upsets me seeing them,
I remember he use to sing “we will always be Red”

He’s like a Scouser never his fault

Reply FB:

You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

Annis, seen this coming years ago.. flagged it up, was surprised with the response I got over the years.

Now it seems I was right all along.

If this is the narrative, he also got us promoted to the Premier League twice and to a Carling Cup final, making him our most successful manager.

You can't blame him for the downfalls and not credit him for the successes if we're using this "Tan is the manager" as our narrative.

You obviously know zero about our history if think under tan reaching and losing a cup final and 2 disastrous seasons in the premier league is the best we've ever achieved Google the club's history as I can't be arsed to educate you

Cardiff can get linked to any striker on the planet. But if there is a fee involved and/or it's not a loan WE CAN'T SIGN THEM - such is the depth of transfer embargo restriction.

Question needs to be asked why journalists are linking us to players we simply can't sign. This is total rubbish - including any story relating to Sydney van Hoodjdonk