Sun Jan 01, 2023 3:28 pm
Mon Jan 02, 2023 9:40 am
Mon Jan 02, 2023 1:07 pm
JulesK wrote:Both not fit for purpose wez and that's from me that hates criticism of our own players.
Mon Jan 02, 2023 6:14 pm
wez1927 wrote:JulesK wrote:Both not fit for purpose wez and that's from me that hates criticism of our own players.
I know I don't like to be critical and are normally positive but these pair aing good enough I would stick James crole up front and give him a chance.
Mon Jan 02, 2023 6:21 pm
Ponty Bluebird wrote:wez1927 wrote:JulesK wrote:Both not fit for purpose wez and that's from me that hates criticism of our own players.
I know I don't like to be critical and are normally positive but these pair aing good enough I would stick James crole up front and give him a chance.
I don’t understand why James Crole & Joel Colwill are not given a chance wez, at least on the bench. What have we got to lose?
Mon Jan 02, 2023 6:49 pm
Ponty Bluebird wrote:wez1927 wrote:JulesK wrote:Both not fit for purpose wez and that's from me that hates criticism of our own players.
I know I don't like to be critical and are normally positive but these pair aing good enough I would stick James crole up front and give him a chance.
I don’t understand why James Crole & Joel Colwill are not given a chance wez, at least on the bench. What have we got to lose?
Tue Jan 03, 2023 2:45 pm
wez1927 wrote:Ponty Bluebird wrote:wez1927 wrote:JulesK wrote:Both not fit for purpose wez and that's from me that hates criticism of our own players.
I know I don't like to be critical and are normally positive but these pair aing good enough I would stick James crole up front and give him a chance.
I don’t understand why James Crole & Joel Colwill are not given a chance wez, at least on the bench. What have we got to lose?
I've watched crole a bit and he's a natural finisher he needs a run out.