Tan and his regime..

TAN AND HIS REGIME..

..are not making it easy for themselves in terms of what popularity, if any, they have left.

They do make it very easy for many like myself to criticise, and also make it easy, based on their actions, their non appearances and their strange strategy on many aspects of the club ( for which they are stewards) for some to say Tan and his cronies are holding onto the club purely out of spite.

If Tan wont sell to Sam because He was/is in some peoples eyes far more of a popular, open, enthusiastic figure, then what is he do to try and gain popularity if that is what he craves?

Not many owners of a football club are popular, Sam, in my opinion managed, the majority of the time, to be that person. Mr Tan, it appears younare incredibly unpopular and do nothing about, nor care, hence it is my opinion, you hold on to us out of spite.

If you wont sell unless someone matches your valuation, fair enough, but the way your taking us down, your value erodes day in day out.

Spite Mr Tan, Spite....

Sadly so much truth in that post Jonny.

The longer Tan keeps the club, the more money he will lose and if relegated even more.
The longer Tan stays the longer our fans will suffer and attendances will drop.

How the hell anyone could now continue to stick up for this Regime is beyond me.

Court cases continue , cheap managers continue , being near the bottom of the Championship continues, debts still very high uo to £140 mill is beyond after so many false promises even worse part of the debt is now to others at high interest.

Of course I would love Sam to come back, but I also want anyone to come in who really cares for our club and has the money to back us properly.

The problem is in the 123 years of the club's history we've only had 2 successful owners whoever owned the club in the 1920s and the 1950s.the rest just kept them treading water .still have to have to be commended though for keeping the club going