Thu Oct 13, 2022 11:45 am
Thu Oct 13, 2022 12:20 pm
Thu Oct 13, 2022 12:22 pm
Thu Oct 13, 2022 1:06 pm
Something_Blue wrote:It is a concern if it means Watters up top
Thu Oct 13, 2022 1:15 pm
NIBluebird wrote:Something_Blue wrote:It is a concern if it means Watters up top
Why would you think Watters ????
Etete or Ojo first !
Thu Oct 13, 2022 1:38 pm
Thu Oct 13, 2022 1:42 pm
pembroke allan wrote:Wouldnt risk Robinson on Saturday especially with game Tues and swans coming up.. as long as Hudson plays with same attack intent without Robinson any replacement will survice..
Thu Oct 13, 2022 1:49 pm
bluebirdoct1962 wrote:pembroke allan wrote:Wouldnt risk Robinson on Saturday especially with game Tues and swans coming up.. as long as Hudson plays with same attack intent without Robinson any replacement will survice..
I agree. Ojo in with Etete on bench.
Thu Oct 13, 2022 3:15 pm
NIBluebird wrote:Something_Blue wrote:It is a concern if it means Watters up top
Why would you think Watters ????
Etete or Ojo first !
Thu Oct 13, 2022 3:27 pm
1980s Bluebird wrote:NIBluebird wrote:Something_Blue wrote:It is a concern if it means Watters up top
Why would you think Watters ????
Etete or Ojo first !
Etete is terrible to be fair, have seen nothing about him that makes me think any diffrent, pre and post injury
Thu Oct 13, 2022 4:06 pm
Thu Oct 13, 2022 4:50 pm
Something_Blue wrote:Ojo upfront??? Why on earth would we play him up front Can’t see him doing a good job up there at all.
Thu Oct 13, 2022 5:28 pm
Thu Oct 13, 2022 9:43 pm
Fri Oct 14, 2022 7:42 am
4281 wrote:In reply to 1980s Bluebird, how can you say that Etete is terrible? The lad has only had about 30/40 minutes of football for the City in 3 substitution games. I agree he is not the finished article, but it is not fair to say he is terrible when he has come on at the end of games. He must be a bit nervous, as he has not played at this level previously. I thought he did well when he came on last Saturday and held the ball up well. Let’s encourage him and see what he is like when he has a full game under his belt. I sincerely hope he does well for us.
Fri Oct 14, 2022 3:21 pm
BiglicksMcGoo wrote:4281 wrote:In reply to 1980s Bluebird, how can you say that Etete is terrible? The lad has only had about 30/40 minutes of football for the City in 3 substitution games. I agree he is not the finished article, but it is not fair to say he is terrible when he has come on at the end of games. He must be a bit nervous, as he has not played at this level previously. I thought he did well when he came on last Saturday and held the ball up well. Let’s encourage him and see what he is like when he has a full game under his belt. I sincerely hope he does well for us.
He's not scored yet so he'll be dismissed as shit in true Cardiff City fashion.
There's little tolerance among the City fans for strikers who don't score, no matter how how young they are, how little playing time they get, or for whatever reason.
Always has been, always will be.
Fri Oct 14, 2022 3:51 pm
Something_Blue wrote:He just isn’t a striker … if anything that ‘finish’ at the end was an example of such. He isn’t great back to goal in my opinion but good facing goal and running towards
Fri Oct 14, 2022 5:10 pm
Fri Oct 14, 2022 5:21 pm
BiglicksMcGoo wrote:4281 wrote:In reply to 1980s Bluebird, how can you say that Etete is terrible? The lad has only had about 30/40 minutes of football for the City in 3 substitution games. I agree he is not the finished article, but it is not fair to say he is terrible when he has come on at the end of games. He must be a bit nervous, as he has not played at this level previously. I thought he did well when he came on last Saturday and held the ball up well. Let’s encourage him and see what he is like when he has a full game under his belt. I sincerely hope he does well for us.
He's not scored yet so he'll be dismissed as shit in true Cardiff City fashion.
There's little tolerance among the City fans for strikers who don't score, no matter how how young they are, how little playing time they get, or for whatever reason.
Always has been, always will be.
Sat Oct 15, 2022 8:39 am
Welshman in CA wrote:BiglicksMcGoo wrote:4281 wrote:In reply to 1980s Bluebird, how can you say that Etete is terrible? The lad has only had about 30/40 minutes of football for the City in 3 substitution games. I agree he is not the finished article, but it is not fair to say he is terrible when he has come on at the end of games. He must be a bit nervous, as he has not played at this level previously. I thought he did well when he came on last Saturday and held the ball up well. Let’s encourage him and see what he is like when he has a full game under his belt. I sincerely hope he does well for us.
He's not scored yet so he'll be dismissed as shit in true Cardiff City fashion.
There's little tolerance among the City fans for strikers who don't score, no matter how how young they are, how little playing time they get, or for whatever reason.
Always has been, always will be.
You forgot the part where the same people will say we should never have let whoever it may be go once he goes to another club & starts scoring.
Sat Oct 15, 2022 9:15 am
Sat Oct 15, 2022 10:25 am
1980s Bluebird wrote:NIBluebird wrote:Something_Blue wrote:It is a concern if it means Watters up top
Why would you think Watters ????
Etete or Ojo first !
Etete is terrible to be fair, have seen nothing about him that makes me think any diffrent, pre and post injury
Sat Oct 15, 2022 10:27 am
OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:Welshman in CA wrote:BiglicksMcGoo wrote:4281 wrote:In reply to 1980s Bluebird, how can you say that Etete is terrible? The lad has only had about 30/40 minutes of football for the City in 3 substitution games. I agree he is not the finished article, but it is not fair to say he is terrible when he has come on at the end of games. He must be a bit nervous, as he has not played at this level previously. I thought he did well when he came on last Saturday and held the ball up well. Let’s encourage him and see what he is like when he has a full game under his belt. I sincerely hope he does well for us.
He's not scored yet so he'll be dismissed as shit in true Cardiff City fashion.
There's little tolerance among the City fans for strikers who don't score, no matter how how young they are, how little playing time they get, or for whatever reason.
Always has been, always will be.
You forgot the part where the same people will say we should never have let whoever it may be go once he goes to another club & starts scoring.
Still pinning your hopes on Watters?
Well, he makes great runs
Sat Oct 15, 2022 11:23 am
piledriver64 wrote:OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:Welshman in CA wrote:BiglicksMcGoo wrote:4281 wrote:In reply to 1980s Bluebird, how can you say that Etete is terrible? The lad has only had about 30/40 minutes of football for the City in 3 substitution games. I agree he is not the finished article, but it is not fair to say he is terrible when he has come on at the end of games. He must be a bit nervous, as he has not played at this level previously. I thought he did well when he came on last Saturday and held the ball up well. Let’s encourage him and see what he is like when he has a full game under his belt. I sincerely hope he does well for us.
He's not scored yet so he'll be dismissed as shit in true Cardiff City fashion.
There's little tolerance among the City fans for strikers who don't score, no matter how how young they are, how little playing time they get, or for whatever reason.
Always has been, always will be.
You forgot the part where the same people will say we should never have let whoever it may be go once he goes to another club & starts scoring.
Still pinning your hopes on Watters?
Well, he makes great runs
How can people want to persevere with Watters and not want to give Etete a chance ?
Watters has now had 20+ games and failed, Etete has had about an hour in the first team and he’s around the same age. I still think Etete can offer something.
Sat Oct 15, 2022 2:09 pm
OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:piledriver64 wrote:OriginalGrangeEndBlue wrote:Welshman in CA wrote:BiglicksMcGoo wrote:4281 wrote:In reply to 1980s Bluebird, how can you say that Etete is terrible? The lad has only had about 30/40 minutes of football for the City in 3 substitution games. I agree he is not the finished article, but it is not fair to say he is terrible when he has come on at the end of games. He must be a bit nervous, as he has not played at this level previously. I thought he did well when he came on last Saturday and held the ball up well. Let’s encourage him and see what he is like when he has a full game under his belt. I sincerely hope he does well for us.
He's not scored yet so he'll be dismissed as shit in true Cardiff City fashion.
There's little tolerance among the City fans for strikers who don't score, no matter how how young they are, how little playing time they get, or for whatever reason.
Always has been, always will be.
You forgot the part where the same people will say we should never have let whoever it may be go once he goes to another club & starts scoring.
Still pinning your hopes on Watters?
Well, he makes great runs
How can people want to persevere with Watters and not want to give Etete a chance ?
Watters has now had 20+ games and failed, Etete has had about an hour in the first team and he’s around the same age. I still think Etete can offer something.
I feel the same but some still cling on to Watters.
Etete is raw but looks like he has something about him unlike Watters.
He needs time and to be brought through slowly imo.