Sat Aug 13, 2022 3:50 pm
Sat Aug 13, 2022 5:01 pm
BluebirdBoyall wrote:Just watched the distance reaction and he says how Cardiff have spent a lot this summer![]()
Correct me if I’m wrong but sure we only spent £35,000 on Tanner and just spent £500,000 on etete last week, wouldn’t consider that a big spend to use as an excuse for there loss
Sat Aug 13, 2022 5:27 pm
Sat Aug 13, 2022 5:55 pm
HarriRhys22 wrote:Ince the Reading Manager said the same, he lost out on two players due to Cardiff paying bigger signing on fees and wages!
Sat Aug 13, 2022 6:36 pm
BluebirdBoyall wrote:Just watched the distance reaction and he says how Cardiff have spent a lot this summer![]()
Correct me if I’m wrong but sure we only spent £35,000 on Tanner and just spent £500,000 on etete last week, wouldn’t consider that a big spend to use as an excuse for there loss
Sat Aug 13, 2022 6:47 pm
Cardiffboy95 wrote:HarriRhys22 wrote:Ince the Reading Manager said the same, he lost out on two players due to Cardiff paying bigger signing on fees and wages!
Was that the reason he lost out on them though? Or was it more down to they didn’t want to play for Ince?
Sat Aug 13, 2022 7:01 pm
City slicker27 wrote:Cardiffboy95 wrote:HarriRhys22 wrote:Ince the Reading Manager said the same, he lost out on two players due to Cardiff paying bigger signing on fees and wages!
Was that the reason he lost out on them though? Or was it more down to they didn’t want to play for Ince?
Financial reasons, apparently. According to Ince anyway.
Sat Aug 13, 2022 8:57 pm
Barclay1 wrote:BluebirdBoyall wrote:Just watched the distance reaction and he says how Cardiff have spent a lot this summer![]()
Correct me if I’m wrong but sure we only spent £35,000 on Tanner and just spent £500,000 on etete last week, wouldn’t consider that a big spend to use as an excuse for there loss
Unfortunately whereas you are correct in essence, you'll get a lot of stick for that comment.
Sun Aug 14, 2022 9:00 am
pembroke allan wrote:Barclay1 wrote:BluebirdBoyall wrote:Just watched the distance reaction and he says how Cardiff have spent a lot this summer![]()
Correct me if I’m wrong but sure we only spent £35,000 on Tanner and just spent £500,000 on etete last week, wouldn’t consider that a big spend to use as an excuse for there loss
Unfortunately whereas you are correct in essence, you'll get a lot of stick for that comment.
Yes in essence we spent £535k on transfer fees on 2 players...... what about the free agents did we get them for nothing or did we pay money to get them to sighn for us? Because as far as "most" people understand free agents cost clubs money in fees even city
your interpretation of how football transfer finance works is bewildering to say the least..
Sun Aug 14, 2022 12:39 pm
Sun Aug 14, 2022 12:59 pm
Sun Aug 14, 2022 6:21 pm
BluebirdBoyall wrote:Well I don’t know how much the signing on fee people demands is but as you all clearly know then please enlighten me as to what the value of each players signing on fee is? I wouldn’t expect it to be that great but as I said I don’t know the value. Due to a few responses it’s clear everyone knows the signing on fee so please tell me otherwise you don’t know and therefore can’t say it was a high feeI also assume the two manager criticising don’t know either so they can’t criticise either
Sun Aug 14, 2022 8:08 pm
bluebirdoct1962 wrote:BluebirdBoyall wrote:Well I don’t know how much the signing on fee people demands is but as you all clearly know then please enlighten me as to what the value of each players signing on fee is? I wouldn’t expect it to be that great but as I said I don’t know the value. Due to a few responses it’s clear everyone knows the signing on fee so please tell me otherwise you don’t know and therefore can’t say it was a high feeI also assume the two manager criticising don’t know either so they can’t criticise either
No idea but I’m pretty sure they wouldn’t have signed without a fee; their agent wouldn’t have allowed that.
Mon Aug 15, 2022 10:22 am
Mon Aug 15, 2022 10:44 am
Abergavenny wrote:My ex neighbour was an City player when in around 2004 he renewed his contract with city He got £75k signing on bonus then just to sign a new contract that gave him a bigger salary
Mon Aug 15, 2022 11:35 am
bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Abergavenny wrote:My ex neighbour was an City player when in around 2004 he renewed his contract with city He got £75k signing on bonus then just to sign a new contract that gave him a bigger salary
Our points exactly mate. Plus, that was close to 20 years ago. Any clues on the name of your ex neighbour?
Mon Aug 15, 2022 11:44 am
Abergavenny wrote:bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Abergavenny wrote:My ex neighbour was an City player when in around 2004 he renewed his contract with city He got £75k signing on bonus then just to sign a new contract that gave him a bigger salary
Our points exactly mate. Plus, that was close to 20 years ago. Any clues on the name of your ex neighbour?
Let’s say an ex swansea player who we forgave for playing for Swansea
Mon Aug 15, 2022 11:49 am
bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Abergavenny wrote:bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Abergavenny wrote:My ex neighbour was an City player when in around 2004 he renewed his contract with city He got £75k signing on bonus then just to sign a new contract that gave him a bigger salary
Our points exactly mate. Plus, that was close to 20 years ago. Any clues on the name of your ex neighbour?
Let’s say an ex swansea player who we forgave for playing for Swansea
I’ve narrowed it to 2. Surname L?
Mon Aug 15, 2022 11:56 am
Abergavenny wrote:bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Abergavenny wrote:bluebirdoct1962 wrote:Abergavenny wrote:My ex neighbour was an City player when in around 2004 he renewed his contract with city He got £75k signing on bonus then just to sign a new contract that gave him a bigger salary
Our points exactly mate. Plus, that was close to 20 years ago. Any clues on the name of your ex neighbour?
Let’s say an ex swansea player who we forgave for playing for Swansea
I’ve narrowed it to 2. Surname L?
Both L & B lived in Langstone no more than couple hundred meters apart But yes it was one of them